According to excellent work by @Crimealytics, we can expect murder to be up about 7% nationally in 2021. That follows a 29% surge in homicides in 2020. Why is this happening? What can be done?
Short answer: this is happening because of the pandemic, politics, and guns. The pandemic has put everyone under intense pressure, but since #COVID concentrates among the same people and places that violence does, they feel it worst of all.
The more pressure, the more people act out. Adding on to that, the institutions responsible for responding to violence - police, community-based interrupters, etc. - are all under intense pressure too. As Rick Rosenfeld and I have said before, it's a perfect storm.
Now add the politics. In the US right now, you're either for the police or you're against them. No middle ground. The murder of George Floyd made this even more stark. A few leaders (@Johnson4Dallas, @ericadamsfornyc, Biden) push back, but this is still the national frame.
This "us vs. them" frame is profoundly destructive because everything we know about violence reduction tells us that (a) we need police, but (b) we need other partners too, and (c) we need everybody to work together. The current frame makes partnership really, really tough.
Finally the guns. There's been a massive surge in gun sales. Early on, research indicated those guns weren't contributing to homicides, but new data suggests the opposite. Also, cities are seeing a spike in illegal gun carrying. More guns in the wrong hands = more gun deaths.
What to do about all this? In July, the @CouncilonCJ established the Violent Crime Working Group to give policymakers easily accessible guidance on how to curb violent crime immediately. counciloncj.org/violent-crime-…
Since July, we've met 11 times, heard from experts, produced two reports on crime trends, held 2 public web events, and issued 7 bulletins updating you on our progress. The bulletins feature concrete suggestions for policy and practice, here's an example: counciloncj.org/meeting-bullet…
In about 2 weeks, we'll release our final report, setting out 10 actions policymakers should take to reduce violence right now. Our group represents everyone - community members, cops, academics, activists - and we found a way to come together, so please look at what we've done.
Gun violence is not inevitable or insurmountable. If you choose the right tactics and strategies, you can make a difference. Stop trying to win the argument, and just focus on fixing the problem, and progress can be made. Lives are at stake, no more should die needlessly.
@abbie_henson Thanks for asking. In criminal justice policy (not academia), we deal with big, tough, real issues. Life, death, freedom, incarceration. No one can challenge the undeniable salience, gravitas, and objective reality of murder, for instance.
@abbie_henson The research I’m interested in gives concrete guidance on how to save lives and keep people free. Agree those engaged in such research should strive for objectivity, but can never be totally so. Also agree they should be transparent about that.
@abbie_henson Strongly disagree that objectivity is an illusion just because it cannot be perfected. The @urbaninstitute blog didn’t just call for critical reflection, as you are. It threw the baby out with the bath water, describing objectivity and rigor as “harmful research practices.”
The @washingtonpost editorial board wrote a reasonable piece on the rising rates of violent crime confronting the country right now. But there's an important point that they, and others, are leaving out... washingtonpost.com/opinions/viole…
Many in media and politics are finally citing "community-based" efforts to reduce violence and the evidence showing they can reduce shootings and killings. That's good. Very good. But what they leave out is this...
The "community-based" anti-violence intervention with the strongest results is not EXCLUSIVELY run by the community. In fact, it is a police-community partnership called focused deterrence, the violence reduction initiative, or sometimes just ceasefire.
"Defunding the police" is a terrible idea that won't serve anyone well - not communities, not police, not anybody. Here are just a few reasons why. washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost…
First, "defunding" would put police and communities in competition with another for funding, precisely at the time when they need to be working together more closely. It's a wedge policy at the worst possible moment.
In LA, police and street outreach leaders used to lobby for each other at city council budget hearings. Will that continue after Garcetti's decision to slash police budgets? latimes.com/california/sto…