Job openings fell to 10.6 million in Nov, still near record highs but lower as the resurgent Delta wave in Nov crimped demand for workers, even before the impacts of Delta are fully felt.
The slowdown was primarily in accommodation & food services (no surprise worker demand there falls as the pandemic worsens). Job openings in accommodation & food services are at their lowest since April 2021, though they're still up 62% over the course of the pandemic.
Despite the drop in job openings, the number of unemployed per job opening fell to 0.65 in Nov (or 1.54 job opening per unemployed worker). A year ago, this figure was reversed with 1.59 unemployed per job opening.
Quits also rose to a new record high of 4.5 million in November, hitting a 3 percent quits rate for just the second time. The surge in quits comes as the Delta variant began to rebound in mid-November.
The surge in quits is being driven primarily by accommodation & food services where the quits rate spiked to 6.9 percent. Not 100% sure but I would hazard a guess that 6.9 percent is the highest of any industry ever since the survey began.
The Beveridge curve shifted to the left in November as both job openings and unemployment fell, though today's job openings rate has been more consistent w/ a ~4% unemployment rate in years past.
Chart's a little messy but high quits are still in line with high job openings. That's a useful reminder that the "Great Resignation" is likely best explained simply by the hot job market. Employers are hiring away workers from their competitors, driving higher churn.
While today's #JOLTS report doesn't bake in the effects of Omicron, it does show what to expect when the pandemic worsens: falling but still high demand for workers and increasing churn, especially in Covid-sensitive sectors.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The increase in job openings was concentrated in accommodation & food services as employers felt more comfortable hiring with the Delta wave starting to wane in Oct. Remains to be seen whether that will continue in Nov given the slow #jobsreport we saw last Fri.
New BLS state #JOLTS data today! Playing around with it:
-Hires per job opening don't seem to be improving in August
-Gap seems roughly stable btwn states withdrawing early from UI vs those not
-UI withdrawal proponents would want to see evidence of hires/opening ⬆️ , gap ⬆️
Consistent w/ the rough comparisons in state employment data released this morning as well. See @bencasselman's thread for findings & appropriate caveats (most of which apply to the JOLTS data too):
The longer history shows the gap is not very stable btwn groups & the range of values is very wide, emphasizing the difficulties in this type of analysis.
Interestingly, early withdrawing states have generally had higher hire yields except early in the pandemic.
The answer is yes. The Oct '21 Beige Book is the 1st time "mental health" for workers has been discussed
Mental health has only been mentioned 6 times previously. The 1st mention was in Apr 2020 & all prior mentions were about demand for mental health services, not worker health
And this pairs nicely with new research from @LaurenTEcon out today finding employee discussions of mental health & burnout on @Glassdoor have more than doubled since the pandemic began:
Overall, this is also part of a broader emphasis on company culture & employee engagement that has grown since the Great Recession and first appeared in the Beige Book in 2017.
Initial UI claims SA fell slightly last week to 290K, hitting another new intra-crisis low.
Initial claims are continuing to decline as the Delta wave recedes. Delta is on the downswing but cases are still elevated, suggesting further room for improvement.
Continuing UI claims (SA) hit another intra-crisis low too, at 2.48 million. The decline has accelerated since mid-September, perhaps due to increased hiring after the Delta wave peaked in early-to-mid September
The expiration of federal unemployment benefits was mentioned 7 times in the the Fed's October Beige Book today:
3: little to no impact
2: modest increase in applicants/workers
1: expects future increases
1: concern about negative impact on household finances of recipients
Vaccine mandates were also mentioned in 6 sections. Discussions mostly about turnover, though more forward-looking as mandates start to take effect.
2: Increased turnover
2: Turnover, but less than expected
2: Concern about future turnover
Incidentally, I wonder if this is the first time the Fed Beige Book has ever mentioned mental health in the context of workers:
> Worries about employee mental health, burnout, safety, and vaccine mandates impacting company culture were mentioned.
Research below shows fairly similar employment losses between parents & non-parents.
I believe the data & exercise, but I'm unsure how to square those results with survey evidence: Census Household Pulse Survey shows ~6.8 million Americans reporting disruption to childcare
And respondents self-report impact to their work availability:
If you focus just on reasons 4-6 which would be most likely to show up in employment data, that still seems like >1 million*, a much larger effect than above.
*Respondents can select multiple answers
When you ask Americans not working what their reasons are, a similar 6.75 million Americans report not working to care for children.