"If you missed X, you don't want to miss Y" - it's not a very resourceful shill and I don't like it at all but...
...if you missed $JEWEL, you may not want to miss $ROME :)
@romedaofinance builds an RPG game powered by $OHM-like currency. Check why I find it interesting: 🧵👇
1) So far $ROME was just considered as another $OHM fork. There were so many of them that the narrative ended abruptly and most forks fell into oblivion. $ROME suffered a lot too. After presale it commenced its journey down as whitelisted presalers were taking hefty profits.
2) But $ROME didn't fall. It survived the death spiral when many traitor Romans refused to cooperate and abandoned the (III,III) treaty (analogous to 3,3 in $OHM). Faith in @romedaofinance came back with the updated plans for Rome expansion. medium.com/@RomeDAO/romed…
3) @romedaofinance announced the details of their APYRPG - RPG game on top of $ROME - token inspired by $OHM model. Unlike other lazy $OHM forks, $ROME is not just a rebase token for a project with no ambitions other than a reserve currency for chain X. It's a in-game currency.
4) $OHM model for $ROME was chosen as it had proven to be a good way to bootstrap the community via staking and build the treasury via bonds. It's one of the pillars of Rome revenue to build sustainable DAO but not the only one. There are also yield strategies and a launchpad.
5) The game is yet to be released but we know the upcoming phases of expansion:
- Campaign 1: Quests, NFT distribution, battles, spoils of war
- Campaign 2: Heroes, resource farming, professions
- Campaign 3: Grand vision of APYRPG (imperial Rome)
6) Campaign 1 is about to start in 1 day. Until this time you can create your in-game character by choosing a house, a class and a character name. This will be your on-chain identity in Rome and your selection will impact which in-game items (NFTs) your hero can equip.
7) To participate in Campaign 1, you have to confirm your conscription and it requires you to lock 0.33 sROME (staked $ROME) for 3 months. It will continue to rebase while locked so you are not losing anything other than opportunity cost of locking but it's not a high price imo.
8) Conscription will also grant you a non-transferrable NFT with a poem written by a community member, translated into Latin by a separate community member along with a 3D model rendered by a third. Engaged community is always a good sign, isn't it?
9) Campaign 1 will be a 3-month-long series of battles and quests during which users will be able to lock sROME to earn specific tiers of chests. The more sROME is locked, the higher a probability to get a higher-tier chest but lower stakes are not excluded from high tiers too.
10) Items earned in Rome campaigns will fall into a number of classes and tiers - some will be very rare and (probably) valuable. Each item will be showcased in the armory, a comprehensive place to view all the items and their stats. It should be ready by the end of Campaign 1.
11) During Campaign 2, the armory will enhance its functionality as a marketplace to enable trading NFTs. Moreover, heroes will unlock and armory items will be used to boost their stats. Many more in-game elements (consumables, resources, professions) are to be introduced too.
12) By Campaign 3, the NFT economy of Rome is thriving and the broader experience of the the RPG can be unlocked:
"In this stage, it becomes a proper grand strategy RPG. The map becomes a grid of a few hundred grid squares across Europe, Africa, and Asia."
13) In sync with the latest trend of veTokens (model introduced by $CRV, adopted by $FXS, $YFI and soon many other protocols), the Team is also building contracts for a gauge-weighted voting system (vesROME) for how resource allocation functions and house actions take place.
14) There are many plans how to make this game an interesting experience that combines DeFi, NFTs and metaverse. This amalgamation of crypto segments bears a close resemblance to @DefiKingdoms $JEWEL, however, two projects are different and don't really compete with each other.
15) Although there is not much yet to see, I consider $ROME as a good exposure to gaming / metaverse trend. This is not my area of expertise though, therefore, I could be very wrong :) The Team has a lot to deliver yet but when they do, it will be too late for a good investment.
16) It's also worth noting that current $ROME MC is already $200M while the treasury holds only $38M in ROME-FRAX LP, $FRAX, $MIM and $MOVR. 5x premium is not the highest we have seen in case of $OHM forks but it's definitely not low.
17) Nevertheless, there are many GameFi projects with higher MC and ridiculously high FDV which don't have heavy treasuries and are valued purely based on expectations. In case of $ROME, when staked, you are not diluted by token unlocks because you benefit from rebases.
19) If you don't have any funds on Moonriver, you will need to bridge them in: app.solarbeam.io/bridge.
The bridge used to give some $MOVR for gas but if it doesn't work you can use gas-less swaps to exchange one of the supported assets for MOVR: app.solarbeam.io/bridge/gas-swap
20) This is not a buy recommendation. I hold $ROME as my GameFi exposure but I'm ready to hold it 0 if it fails miserably :) I wanted to write about $ROME earlier but procrastinated because of Christmas and it pumped in the meantime. I hope this thread won't mark the top :)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Concentrated liquidity in Uniswap V3 has usually been considered as a net positive innovation. It's definitely good for traders, arbitrageurs and parasitic MEV wizards. But is it good for LPs? According to a recent study, half of LPs are actually losing money!
See more: 🧵👇
TL;DR:
- While Uni V3 generates the highest trading fees of any DeFi protocol, impermanent loss dominates the fee income in most pools, leaving a net loss for liquidity providers.
- Half of liquidity providers in Uni V3 get negative returns when compared to HODLing.
1) The study I'm referring to in this thread is the most in-depth analysis of LPing in Uni V3 I've seen so far. Other publications usually focus on capital efficiency and LP fees but they ignore the cost of LPing, i.e. impermanent loss. This one doesn't.
I recently crossed 10k followers on Twitter. That's amazing. Thank you everyone!
On this occasion I would like to share a few thoughts and announce that I'm looking for a helpmate (an intern) to establish a symbiotic relationship for both of us. Read on for more details 👇
I had never imagined there would be so many people interested in my content, especially that I'm not very entertaining with my DeFi talk and I don't post 100x moonshots which will make you a millionaire in a week. I don't shitpost too. Yet, you are still here. Thank you!
Although my Twitter bio says "full time in DeFi", this "full time" got substantially reduced in recent months. I'm stigmatized in meatspace with normal life. I don't live in the parents' basement - I have a house, wife and infant daughter. I mean it's great but it takes time :)
I must admit I'm absolutely astonished at the amount of effort @templedao put to prepare the Opening Ceremony. Combining Discord, Cryptovoxels, Metamask into a seamless gaming / metaverse experience also gives me a lot of confidence in the level of technical skills the Team has.
Many may feel discouraged by the lack of clear instructions how to participate in the ceremony. "Just take my money and let me ape in!".
But making it difficult to enter may be a very clever idea.
Firstly, it's really hard and time-consuming to complete all the quests on your own. That's why you need to collaborate with others. This collective effort to find the right way is the process of creating a community. And strong community is everything for the project.
Recent amazing $SPELL and $INV rides encouraged me to look into other projects that issue overcollateralized stablecoins. I compared $MKR, $SPELL, $FLX, $INV and $LQTY to find out that $LQTY seems to be extremely undervalued relatively to others. Will it have its moment soon?
1) To compare the projects I collected the following data from @coingecko:
- MC for a governance token (e.g. $SPELL, $INV, $LQTY)
- MC for a stablecoin (e.g. $MIM, $DOLA, $LUSD)
- TVL in the protocol
- Governance token MC / stablecoin MC ratio
- Governance token MC / TVL ratio
2) Taking these ratios into consideration, it seems that $LQTY is the most undervalued relatively to others. Its TVL is $2.2B, MC for stablecoin, $LUSD, is more than $600M and MC for the (non)governance token, $LQTY, is only $63M. I ran a few simulations of $LQTY MC...
If you think $FTM, $AVAX, $SOL, $MATIC, $STAKE, $MOVR, $ONE, etc. are "Ethereum killers" because they are cheap to use while $ETH is prohibitively expensive and can't scale, you miss the forest for the trees (also ngmi).
Ethereum is scaling now but you are not paying attention.
Optimistic Rollups (Optimism and Arbitrum) are just the beginning of the new era. The rise of Zero Knowledge Rollups (zkRollups) is a whole new paradigm. It's a cryptographic magic our simple brains can't yet embrace.
"Anything any monolithic blockchain (L1) can ever do, a single zkRollup can do it significantly (>10x) better. And there can be hundreds or thousands of zkRs interoperating relatively seamlessly."
6 months ago I covered $OHM before the project officially launched. Investment of 570$ into Initial Discord Offering would be worth more than $1.5M now if staked all the time... Absolutely incredible.
Today I want to share a project which gives me similar vibes. Meet $TEMPLE.
1) I must admit I had seen $TEMPLE being mentioned here and there many times but I was reluctant to research "another $OHM fork" as it was pitched to me. However, when I finally invested my time to go through Medium articles and Discord I understood it was a premature assessment.
2) First and foremost, I don't think @TempleDAO is a competitor to @OlympusDAO. $TEMPLE definitely borrows some ideas from $OHM but innovates on them to create a new set of products with a different objective.