Maybe it's time to stop labelling "conspiracy theorists" pejoratively, since its now plain that "a network of Fascists" have undertaken a "global palace coup", manipulating a pretend emergency to impose their New World Order, writes Mr Nawaz, @LBC's leading conspiracy theorist. ImageImage
Mr Nawaz regards Facebook warning followers about his repeatedly spreading false information as proof of the conspiracy to suppress the truth about the conspiracy ... Image
One difficulty is that challenge to spreading conspiratorial material - for example, from Members of Parliament; or from platforms - is taken as validation. Image
Mr Nawaz had intended to ressume his broadcasting in the new year - but will leave immediately, with no contract renewal on offer.

My sense is his increasingly strong language about fascism & conspiracies has generated significant internal concern.

Mr Nawaz's own response to the news makes fairly clear that this was not a mutual decision. It seems clear it was the decision of the radio station, not to offer a renewal, and also for him to cease presenting immediately, before the end of his existing (soon to expire) contract.
Mr Nawaz has posted - on his social media account - that "he refuses to go quietly into the night" and will shortly set up a substack newsletter, for subscribers, which will be dedicated to "resisting the democratization of the truth"
Though only a couple of LBC voices went public with their concerns - particularly @IainDale and Matthew Thompson earlier over the US election conspiracies - media reporters say that a lot of other voices were concerned about the conspiracy theory material
Mr Nawaz says that his contract runs until April 2022. The LBC decision to end the show immediately, 3 months early, has happened suddenly. He had expected to return tomorrow after a Christmas break. Image
The actor Laurence Fox has launched a campaign to boycott the LBC broadcaster, saying he only listened to Mr Nawaz on the station. Image
Does this mean Fox will not appear on LBC this year?

My personal guess is Fox & his fledgling political party "Reclaim" will *not* actually boycott LBC across the year, but tbc over the weeks/months to come. The broadcaster may cease to invite him given declaration of a boycott Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunder Katwala

Sunder Katwala Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sundersays

8 Jan
If Lord Sumption wants to be historically accurate, and not to efface history, then he should make sure the Telegraph correct this misleading claim. Edward Colston was the Deputy Governor of the Royal Africa Company, a very major role. Image
The company structure of the Royal African Company. King James II played an active role as Governor but this became an honorific position for William of Orange after 1688 for the period when Colston was Deputy Governor
brh.org.uk/site/articles/… Image
This was the more pro-Colston of two draft plaques, in the debate about replacing the plaque left unresolved in the years before 2020. This draft supported by the Society of Merchant Venturers, the main 'defenders' of the Colston legacy in the debate
Read 10 tweets
8 Jan
Listening to the FA Cup third round on @bbc5live Quite a good group of Saturday 3pm games
Worth tuning in now for the last 20 minutes ...
Still 25 minutes to go. Cambridge, 16th in league one, are one-up at Newcastle in what has been the sort of cup tie that works very we on the radio
Read 9 tweets
8 Jan
I think there are some strong arguments against how Colston's statue was removed (as well as reasons why a jury may choose not to convict those who did it). One thing that this did not do is 'efface the memory' of history: most people have obvs now heard much more about it since.
There are so many distinct, pretty unique aspects of the Colston in Bristol debate (which was not well known outside Bristol). I personally think this is by far the strongest general point against removing statues in this way. The 'erasing history' intuition doesn't stack up. Image
This has been a message from the Campaign for Centrist Compromise on Statues.
- Remove Colston legally
- Keep *almost* all the others (99%+)
- Retain and Reinterpret (and argue over how)
- Above all, focus much more on who to recognise, not who to remove.
Read 5 tweets
7 Jan
Jack Dromey MP made his final House of Commons contribution yesterday afternoon in Westminster Hall. He spoke about the importance of the principle of refugee protection, and the need to deliver a welcoming Afghan resettlement scheme in practice. RIP hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-0… Image
Jack Dromey's views of both immigration and anti-racism were very much influenced by his Irish identity & how that shaped his belief in mutual solidarity and empathy of the Irish with post-war Commonwealth Black & Asian migrants and later minority groups
Read 5 tweets
7 Jan
Swindon of the Southern League enjoyed a big FA Cup upset win against Man City in their first ever meeting (1910). But a 1-1 draw in 1930 led to a 10-1 defeat in the replay. And they lost 7-0 in 1953 too. Image
Swindon's 4th round (quarter-final) win over Man City in 1910 got them to the first of their two FA Cup semi-finals, losing to Newcastle who beat Barnsley in the final. Swindon got to the semi-final again in 1912, but lost to Barnsley who won the FA Cup. Image
The 1910 FA Cup run led to Barnsley and Swindon being invited to Paris to promote football to the French by playing for the Dubonnet Cup at the Parc des Princes. (The organisers had wanted to repeat the FA Cup final, but Newcastle could not make it). Swindon won the Dubonnet Cup ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
6 Jan
Its interesting that the Prime Minister sees it as in his interests to engage in this argument about the jury verdict. His apparent argument seems confused in several respects. Image
- Nobody can change now what Colston/Royal Africa Company did from 1680-1692
- Erecting the statue *174 years after his death* was obviously an effort THEN to rewrite history of Colston & Bristol retrospectively
- So too the debates over its wording & its removal in last 20 years
Johnson's argument was a bit more fence-sitting than the headline.

"I think if people democratically want to remove a statue or whatever, that's fine. But in general we should preserve our cultural, artistic, historical legacy" Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(