Watched #DontLookUp by @GhostPanther yesterday. It felt very real. Unless we address the distortion of reality by politicians aided by complicit media backed by vested interests, we are never going to be able to deal with any crisis.🧵
What you see presented in the news everyday is distorted. The 'debates' don't reflect global scientific consensus. The short news cycle remains ahistoric and acontextual - full of hopium (can't tell you how many times I've been asked to end on a 'feel good' note).
Govt policies are driven by short-termism, economic interests of lobby groups, and self-interest (corruption and profiteering) - nothing to do with what's needed to protect people, and deal with the problem. And the Telegraph/spectator/express & much of the BBC push to normalise.
The majority of scientists make up a minority of rhetoric on media and social media, because misinformation from fringe groups goes far aided by vested interests - who have preferential access to politicians and a non-independent media.
I don't think all media is like this- but many of the the biggest players are. There are few independent players like the @BylineTimes that are trying to put reality out there, but it's frankly like a drop in an ocean of misinformation.
You'll see scientists/medics/lobby groups who put out certain messages (groups that are fringe) portrayed prominently in the media. Why was Dr. Coatzee from SA who said omicron was 'mild' widely platformed in the media? We heard far less from many others issuing clear warnings.
The 'mild' narrative spread like wildfire, but the nuance that rapid exponential spread would far outstrip any 'mildness' didn't- with many media outlets platforming fringe scientists saying this was 'good news', and people should get infected with omicron to get immunity.
Why are UsForThem, an anti-vax anti-mask group with unclear funding repeatedly platfomed by the Telegraph, by GMB & Radio 4? Why are supporters of the great barrington declaration ('herd immunity via infection') on radio 4 constantly despite having been proven completely wrong.
Why does media dichotomise arguments and create strawmen- arguing for mitigations is being 'pro-lockdown'. Arguing for safer schools is being 'pro-school closure'... These are false dichotomous narratives created and perpetuated by politicians, media & fringe grps of scientists.
Why does the BBC never discuss how to makes schools safer, rather casting doubt on measures like masks shown to be effective in studies all around the world, with millions of children wearing masks to schools every single day. Why does it promote anti-science exceptionalism?
Why do many outlets/scientists engage in zero covid bashing of countries that are still maintaining elimination/suppression & have had massively lower deaths than us. Surely we should be looking at what they're doing rather than bashing them & engaging in xenophobic stereotyping.
Despite the extensive research on long COVID now showing it is a very concerning multi-system disease that occurs even in people with mild illness - why is it almost never mentioned, except to suggest it's 'mild' and psychosomatic (not the scientific consensus at all!)
Why does our media not highlight how exceptional UK policy is and how different our outcomes in the pandemic have been compared to other countries? Why does our media never highlight the real risks to children- never discussed long covid from children.
Never questions the frankly shockingly exceptional policies in the UK with respect to vaccination of children, and the impact this has had (children have died before they could get vaccinated, thousands have long COVID). Why? Shouldn't this be a scandal?
Rather, we see gaslighting of those impacted by realities never portrayed. And attacks to those trying to bring these to the fore. Gag orders on NHS frontline workers. Coordinated attacks on scientists. Hit pieces on scientists in the media.
It's not just an uphill battle. We need to recognise the power gradients here. Scientists individually, or even coordinated cannot fight massive power structures that work as systems to promote vested interests of the few. We simply don't have the resources or the influence.
As a scientist I feel that we can keep screaming into the void, but unless the power structures that control the flow of information are dismantled, we will get nowhere. Given the handling of the pandemic I feel zero hope for the climate crisis.
#DontLookUp isn't about a hypothetical future- it's about a very real present. Just look at the hopium push during the omicron crisis, how it normalised inaction, and the devastating consequences globally. We're living this every single day.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Really? I read this thread & saw it's purpose as providing information to people that long COVID is a multi-system chronic disease with a complex aetiology - a message that many scientists & govts have failed to. Please stop minimising. You can critique what you don't agree with.
And yes, vaccines do help with long COVID as @IanRicksecker acknowledges, but the data are clear that long COVID doesn't disappear with vaccination either. And given many children don't even have the option of being vaccinated, surely risks to them should also be considered.
Snapshotting because I'm blocked. I've found @IanRicksecker very open to engaging with public health scientists to provide a clear and accurate picture for those who want to know more. Rather than dismissing and judging what he's done, perhaps engage with him.
How on earth is this not a scandal? Long COVID numbers in children have more than tripled in 6 months. 117,000 children with long COVID and 20,000 with illness for *more than a year*. How on earth is this acceptable? - these are children!
I cannot bear the fact that we live in a society that has normalised mass infection of children, with a virus that's causing long term illness in >100K kids, and has a higher mortality rate than every other childhood illness.
And yet, our govt will do next to nothing to make schools safer. JCVI will not vaccinated children from a preventable disease. Scientists and paediatricians will continue to argue against basic mitigations that protect children. How on earth did this happen?
If govts admitted long COVID is very real, and very concerning (multi-system disease with neuro-degeneration, renal, cardiac, vascular, and immune dysfunction), the whole approach would have to change from focusing on not overwhelming hospitals to actually tackling transmission.
It's interesting that despite the huge levels of accumulating evidence, almost none that is reassuring, politicians, and even many scientific advisors never mention or consider this in advice or policy making. Why?
JCVI - happy to discuss rare theoretical long term effects from vaccines that haven't materialised after millions of children vaccinated across the globe, never consider long COVID, steadfastly against recommending vaccines to children who are being exposed to mass infection.
There's nothing remotely superior/developed about trying to 'tech' our way out of the pandemic with vaccines, therapeutics & testing while ignoring basic public health measures. Masks, ventilation, good contact tracing, support with isolation all important. Every layer matters.🧵
Vaccination and therapies don't mean other measures for prevention are superseded. Testing doesn't mean mitigations in schools not needed. I really don't understand how govt and even many scientists don't get this. It's an airborne virus - we need mitigations that address this.
And prevention is always better than treating thousands of people in hospital, and letting hundreds of thousands get long COVID. Better in terms of overall public health, long term health and life expectancy, pressures on the NHS, and even costs to health services.
Usual misinformation we're used to from the BBC now... there's actually a lot of very strong evidence that masks in schools reduce school outbreaks, infection in children, and in parents alongside other measures. But don't let facts get in the way of your preferred narrative.🧵
Here's one study from Arizona published by the CDC that showed outbreaks in schools with mask mandates were 3.5 lower than schools without: cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
Another US study showing counties with mask mandates in schools had much 2x lower rises in paediatrics infection after schools re-opened: cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
The gaslighting cycle:
SAGE: Don't wait till hosp rise to act or it'll be too late
Govt/media:
-'too much uncertainty'/'mild'/'need more data'
-'SAGE modelling wrong'
-'closely following the data' (what data? PCRs/LFD capacity reached)
-'hosps mostly incidental'
-'too late now'!
The misinformation/disinformation campaigns pushing this rhetoric have been incredibly strong with media narratives completely divorced from reality. It's been impossible to breakthrough the spin & frustrating to watch it all unfold, despite numerous warnings from SAGE & others.
I don't believe what's in the media actually represents the scientific consensus on this situation. I think the majority of experts were concerned and supported early action, but listening to media, you'd be forgiven for thinking otherwise.