A handful of thoughts on flyouts for job market candidates.
One of three 🧵s – threads 2 and 3 have tips specific to in-person flyouts and remote flyouts
Review the notes & screenshots you took during first-round interviews so you remember what this employer/school asked you about and whom you met.
The structure of a flyout is generally fairly standard:
1-on-1 interviews with faculty
your job market talk in the middle of the day
more 1-on-1s
maybe a meeting with graduate students
maybe lunch/dinner with faculty
Making a good impression part 1: 1-on-1 interviews
Do your homework about interviewers: what are their areas of research? Which papers of theirs are you excited about? What areas of overlap might you have?
Let your interviewer guide the conversation if they have an agenda.
But don’t be grumpy/awkward if they can barely remember who you are or what your research agenda is (they’re meeting a lot of people too!) -- just take the lead in directing the conversation
For each interview, identify what you want to discuss, in case they don’t guide the conversation. Bring up a piece of (non-JMP) research you’re working on, their research, the institution, or a current debate in the field.
Making a good impression part 1: Job Market Talk during flyouts (this really deserves its own thread…)
Know roughly who in the department is invested in your type of work and can anticipate what they’ll be curious about.
Manage your time – don’t go over time, don’t speak a mile a minute. Be willing to cut sections if it means you’ll end on time
A thread on In-Person flyouts. A complement to the main thread on flyouts.
Maximize the number of days you can be in the same location. Try to schedule two flyouts in the same city without going back home in between if you can.
Here is a list of questions I received most often during (first round) interviews, per request. Hope the list helps this year’s JMCs prep #EconTwitter#EconJobMarket
🧵
Questions about the JMP:
clarifications? What’s the significance/contribution? What are the shortcomings? How would you enhance it & (implicitly) what is stopping you from doing so? What is your main policy implication?
Qs about the JMP:
Where does this fit in the literature? How does this weigh against other evidence on the topic? What would <someone else who has written on the topic> critique about your work?
Emily Dickinson -- five poems for researchers.
Born today in 1830.
A short 🧵
E Dickinson on growth mindset/imposter syndrome
We never know how high we are
Till we are called to rise;
And then, if we are true to plan,
Our statures touch the skies—
The Heroism we recite
Would be a daily thing,
Did not ourselves the Cubits warp
For fear to be a King—
Emily Dickinson to junior researchers everywhere:
I'm nobody! Who are you?
Are you nobody, too?
Then there's a pair of us — don't tell!
They'd banish us, you know.
How dreary to be somebody!
How public, like a frog
To tell your name the livelong day
To an admiring bog!
Here’s a data download for first round interviews. Wisdom I received and things I learned along the way when I was on the JM last year. Please feel free to add your 2c! (I’ll post my notes on flyouts soon)
long 🧵 1/x #EconTwitter#EconJobMarket
Your goal is to convince them that you are smart, competent, & kind, that you have an interesting pipeline of work, that you would be a great colleague, and that you will come if they offer you a job. (Insight from @lkatz42)
2/x
Approach interviews with excitement--not dread. Interviews are an opportunity to share work that you’re excited about, an opportunity to chat with a handful of really smart people taking your research seriously. How wonderful!
3/x