As a practitioner, I can tell you that immigration law is complex. It frequently doesn't make sense, exalts form over function, and when misused, works against people.
So long as you're not calling on ICE to pick up undocumented people brave enough to speak out, we're allies.
Good sign that you're on the right side of history.
But back to the question: many citizens today (my own clients included) were once undocumented.
Most immigration violations are not criminal, even though we mete out criminal punishments for them.
And even when they are criminal, it's rarely more than a misdemeanor.
If we agree the punishment should fit the crime, firing up the ICE machine for deportation is rarely the answer.
Basic notions of humanity dictate that a noncitizen not be ripped from their life without due process of law.
I hope, through your new position, that you communicate the dire need to shut down family detention for good, restore the right to seek asylum, and stop the abuse of our immigration law as if it were meant to be deportation law.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In November, we successfully obtained an index prepared by @UMich of the sealed #TantonPapers. The first glimpse of the papers I've fought to see for 5 years now.
Oral argument 1/12; if you're just getting here: here's why these papers are important:
We've been listening to white supremacists & allies for far too long.
The Trump years were just a peek at what they would've done if they were in the driver's seat. But a year in, they've still got their hands on the wheel.
Who in particular am I talking about? Glad you asked!
Groups:
Federation for American Immigration Reform
Center for Immigration Studies
NumbersUSA
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Progressives For Immigration Reform
Funded by:
Colcom Foundation
Pioneer Fund
Sidney Swensrud Foundation
Weeden Foundation
Foundation For The Carolinas
Scaife Foundations
Implemented by:
Stephen Miller
Jeff Sessions
Steve Bannon
8 years ago I took the case of a young girl fleeing a horrific situation in her country. Because she got the right advice at the right time, we got her a green card as a "special immigrant juvenile."
Today, her application for naturalization was recommended for approval.
She blew through the civics, reading, and writing tests without making a single mistake: even her handwriting was the neatest I've seen!
Truthfully, this was an easy case: even getting her out of deportation years ago and winning her green card.
But a lot could have gone wrong: only a couple of years after she got her green card, Virginia decided it would no longer issue the court orders necessary to get SIJS.
My dad shared this with me today. A letter dated 60 years ago that confirms his last name registration as Ahmad.
Naming conventions differ wildly around the world. When he was born, my father was not given a "last name."
He may have been known as son of Chiragh-ud-din, his father. Or perhaps by the village of his birth, clan, or family occupation. But when he immigrated to England in the early 1960's, he needed a last name. So he picked one.
We've only been Ahmads for 60 years, as of yesterday.
In my practice, we deal with a wide variety of naming conventions: Latino conventions with both parents' last names, Chinese with the family name first, transcription variances from non-Roman alphabets, and "last names" that aren't family names.