Advice for mentees (eg, med students, residents, junior faculty) who want to publish a manuscript
1. Research your mentor.

Know their body of work, content expertise
Do they routinely work w trainees?
Ask mentees who have worked w this mentor what the experience is like
For example, I see work of @DrSpratticus and the people who are thankful to receive his guidance.

@RadoncUh @UHhospitals trainees and faculty are lucky to have @DrSpratticus.

@annalaucis @DanWahlMD @UMichRadOnc @BaydounMDPhD

2. When you initially contact your mentor, send:

brief intro
your interests, goals
if you have interest in particular project, why
CV
skills (eg, biostats, AI/ML, making apps, @Photoshop, video editing)
For example, @EricLehrer was a biostatistician.

He communicates in a language w @wedney2017 + biostats team that I don't understand. 😅

The papers are awesome.

Christine Lin (@PennStHershey med student) builds apps and has been a coauthor on a number of works just by applying this skill

3. Don't send an email longer than the screen of your phone.

Consider asking to meet and discuss further.

It's sometimes faster to discuss on phone, via zoom, or in person rather than typing it out.
4. If you ask to meet, send prep materials a few days before, eg:
most recent version of manuscript, figures, response letter
questions
roadblocks

Faculty members are asked to attend a ton of meetings, and many could be shortened. Image
5. Establish your involvement in the project and author line order early.

If you do bulk of writing, you could be first author.
If more peripheral role, you could be a co-author.

I don't understand why faculty have trainees help on a project but then don't include as coauthors. Image
6. As the trainee, it is your job to find all the grammar/syntax errors, typos, and formatting problems.

You did all this when you submitted papers in college, so keep up the great work.

If you are junior trainee, this might be your only role. Image
7. Don't ghost the mentor.

It is difficult to know what happened:
personal problems?
family problems?
illness?
lack of interest in project?
emails not going through?

If something changed, just say so. A good mentor shouldn't be offended.
8. At all times, be able to describe prospectus of your project, eg, background, purpose, general methods, your role in project.

Your prospectus is fair game for interviews and will hopefully materialize into a publication.

Image
9. Finish your projects. Take on new projects carefully. Balance your projects with the rest of your life. Image
Our life is:
1/3 work
1/3 family and friends
1/3 sleep

Imbalance in any third will negatively affect the other parts.

@LeilaTchelebi
10. A rule of thumb is that you should try to get the manuscript back to your mentor in 1-2 weeks (assuming you have the data to write up).

Keep your mentor up to date on your progress.
11. As junior scientific writers, we are too wordy.

It's no surprise because our colleges asked us to write 40 page papers. 😅

Scientific writing is all about condensing information into as few words as possible, like a haiku. Image
12. If your are presented w a potential project where you have to code 100 variables per patient without clear purpose, I would avoid the project.

These projects are usually fishing expeditions.

In residency, we called them "freedom from everything" projects. @ThomasChurilla
Almost invariably, the mentee will later be asked to go through the charts again to code variable #101.

13. Done is better than perfect.

Perfect is the enemy of good.

Give yourself a deadline and write what you can. Once you have a draft, send it to your mentor. Image
14. Underpromise and overdeliver.

Tell your mentor you will be able to send part of the manuscript in 2 weeks, then send the whole manuscript in 1 week.
15. Use referencing software.

Do not reference manually, it is not worth your time.

Some good options:
EndNote, Zotero, Paperpile, Readcube

16. Find your place of zen and invest in technology to optimize writing.

With a dual screen monitor (preferably 1080p+) and the Split Window tool, you can have your manuscript, response letter, reference manager, PDFs, and browser all open at once. Image
17. Make life easy for co-authors.

When sending manuscript, send semi-completed COI form and offer to complete it for them (w their permission/info).
Inform everyone if manuscript was submitted, resubmitted. They might get email to affirm authorship.

icmje.org/disclosure-of-… Image
18. Be nice, hard-working, and smart. And in that order.

You don't have to be the brightest light bulb, just shine as bright as you can all the time (do your best!).

@DrSpratticus @VPrasadMDMPH Image
19. As we get older, we start to get conflicting advice from different mentors. Sometimes, the advice is also in contrast to what our close friends and family recommend.

Ultimately, you have to decide which pieces of advice are best.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Zaorsky, MD MS

Nicholas Zaorsky, MD MS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NicholasZaorsky

Jan 7
Guide to writing a medical research manuscript

bit.ly/ZaorskyManuscr…

Here is advice after writing, reading, and reviewing 1000+ manuscripts.

#MedTwitter Image
Why do we do medical research?

There are at least two problems with medicine:
(1) in 100 years, half of it will be proven to be false;
(2) we don’t know which half.
Success in our research career depends on these 3 pillars.

Thanks to @freddyeescorcia for the slide. Image
Read 108 tweets
Aug 27, 2021
Facility volume has been explored as a surrogate of quality of care in medicine.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12230353/
@AnnalsofIM
In oncology, facility surgical volume is correlated with survival.

Work from @StoltzfusKelsey @LeilaTchelebi @DanTrifMD @NirajGusani in @JNCCN

Read 17 tweets
Aug 9, 2021
Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: international consensus on evaluation and management

@NatRevUrol

rdcu.be/csM2z
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34363040/
#PCSM ImageImage
Since the 2000s, the use of radical prostatectomy has been increasing for prostate cancer (vs external beam and brachytherapy).

@EUplatinum
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27597241/ Image
The increase in prostatectomy includes all risk groups, particularly those with high-risk features

Read 30 tweets
Feb 11, 2020
Publication productivity and academic rank in medicine.

Via @AcadMedJournal
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028299
From @EricLehrer @DrEmmaHolliday @PennStHershey @penn_state

[tweetorial] on the impact of h-index and m-index on promotion/tenure.

#academicmedicine #MedEd #scholarship Image
@AcadMedJournal @EricLehrer @DrEmmaHolliday @PennStHershey @penn_state Are metrics for promotion and tenure at academic institutions easy to understand?
@AcadMedJournal @EricLehrer @DrEmmaHolliday @PennStHershey @penn_state Most would say the requirements are nebulous.

e.g., here are requirements from top tier institution, for non-tenure track and tenure-track faculty.

Historically, some said:
Asst prof = regional reputation
Assoc prof = national
Full prof = international ImageImage
Read 26 tweets
Dec 29, 2019
In this thread, I will compile my medical illustrations in oncology and #RadOnc.

Many are from textbook w @DanTrifMD
amazon.com/Absolute-Clini…
based on @ARRO_org study guide for board exams.

A picture is worth 1000 words.
Here is oncology in a few pics.
@DanTrifMD @ARRO_org @SpringerNature Starting with pediatrics:
Rhabdomyosarcoma treatment paradigm for cancers of head/neck depends on parameningeal vs non-parameningeal location. PM is an unfavorable site, affects stage. #sarcoma #HNCSM
@DanTrifMD @ARRO_org @SpringerNature CNS/brain anatomy from sagittal view.
#BTSM
Chapter from @cgr0105, Sameer Nath, from University of Colorado
Read 49 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(