People are piling into the $FTM ecosystem as they realize it's got a few key catalysts in its favor:
• Strong price momentum
• @andrecronjetech's ve(3,3) token launch
• An undervaluation of project TVL
• A $1b incentive program
So what are the projects I'm looking at?
Well, value will probably accrue back to $FTM, making it a clear option, but for higher-leverage/higher-risk plays, most are looking at ecosystem coins.
Additionally, the top 20 ecosystem coins by TVL all stand to benefit from the new ve(3,3) token launch.
First, a top-down look at $FTM protocols by TVL.
Measuring protocols by TVL/MKT CAP isn't a perfect way to find undervaluation, but it can give us a place to start when gem-hunting.
Here's a table of the following coins and their $ETH analogs:
(Not a perfect comparison)
Off the bat, we can see relative under- and over-valuations.
We've got to consider a few things here:
• How large the market cap is
• What emissions and tokenomics are like
• How TVL translates to value accrual/adoption
Here are my favorites:
1. Spookyswap ($BOO)
I think a lot of Alt-L1 exchanges are really undervalued.
Spooky is at the top of that list, doing 20x its market cap in weekly volume.
That's nearly twice as much Volume/Mkt Cap as its next competitor.
Beethoven X, a clone of Balancer V2 (a DEX), is relatively overvalued by TVL, but I still like it.
The $BAL V2 model has huge potential as it allows you to create an index of assets and earn fees by providing liquidity for that asset group.
But Balancer itself has been a bit of a disappointment, trading today at the same price as in June.
I think the $BAL / $BEETS model is highly underrated and innovative compared to conventional AMM models.
We'll have to see if that translates to trading volume and value capture.
Perhaps an influx of DeFi-interested capital will allow the $BAL/ $BEETS model (and its new V2 improvements) to thrive on $FTM where it couldn't on $ETH
And at a $40m valuation in seems like it has some room to grow.
There are some problems with $FTM, however: in runups like these the final bagholders can get burned.
And with so many original holders in profit, price can collapse as quickly as it moons.
How long will the runup continue?
Another issue?
The massive yields available (up to 200% on stablecoins) are simply unsustainable. These rewards are sometimes referred to as an 'incentives pump,' and can fade as the money dries up.
Yields and APYs come directly from Fantom's $1 billion incentive coffers.
Nonetheless, there is clear momentum in the sapce and TVL/adoption metrics show that $FTM still has a long way to go.
And with catalysts coming and new devs/users flocking in I still think we're looking at significant upside.
Thanks for reading! If you liked the thread, please help me get it out to more people by RTing/Favoriting the first tweet, linked below: 👇
Here's everything you need to know about $CRV and $CVX (Convex), the war between protocols to accumulate them, and how you can make money on the trade.
(A thread in 3 parts) 👇
PART 1: THE LIQUIDITY PROBLEM
DEXes rely on Automated Market Makers (AMMs) to function.
These AMMs rebalance with every crypto swap/trade. With every sale, price goes down.
The more liquidity in the liquidity pool, the better, as price doesn't slip/rebalance as much.
This is important for any crypto asset, as illiquid pairs mean buyers and sellers get a worse deal.
You sometimes see this when buying microcaps. DEXes ask you to adjust slippage tolerance, which basically means the price of your asset is changing due to your trade.
Investing in crypto is about understanding narratives: time the narratives, ride the trade, and benefit from the momentum of an inefficient market discovering value.
Here are the narratives that will shape crypto and mint millionaires in 2022:
(THREAD)👇
1. The L1 Trade Continues
The explosive growth of non-eth L1s is not a fad, $ETH dominance is not a given.
Devs and users continue to embrace new chains in the hopes of being early.
@TaschaLabs outlines the dilemma of just rotating back to $ETH below: