There will be no backlash on Jason Momoa for 'splitting' with Lisa Bonet. Why?
Because women break rules for Alphas and make rules for Betas.
Instead we'll see rationalizations about personal differences or whatever helps with the cognitive dissonance women experience in a guy like Momoa being 'available' again.
Women would rather share a successful, hot, Alpha than be saddled with a faithful Beta – even if that Alpha is just a fantasy for them.
In any other context Momoa would represent a loss of sexual agency investment on the part of women. It's the Trophy Wife abandonment fear women fixate on. But because it's Momoa women will sublimate that fear in favor of breaking rules (feeling indignation) for an Alpha.
For comparison, if Hugh Jackman announced he was splitting with his wife (+13 years older than him) you can bet he'd get a lot of backlash.
Both Momoa and Jackman married young. They represent a female fantasy of securing an Alpha early in life and riding out the emotional investment to hold the marriage together when their men hit their peak potential.
If Jackman left his wife he'd confirm women's fears and be a villain. But an Apex Alpha like Momoa will be easily forgiven because he's the Alpha women will break rules for.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That’s a pretty strong statement for a 23 y.o. guy who’s known this girl less than a year. Looks like @MikhailaAleksis found her “soulmate” long before my show. Must’ve been a “God thing” I guess.
“You just hate me because you wanna bang me.” I’m gonna use this next time someone throws shade at me and see how far I get.
Elizabeth Holmes' guilty verdict is a "Win for Feminism" because, Patriarchy,… slate.com/news-and-polit…
There is literally nothing feminist ideology cannot reframe to be unfalsifiable.
"As a budding billionaire aiming to boost Theranos’ reputation, Elizabeth Holmes embraced all things masculine. But once on trial for fraud, she became the feminine yin to her formerly masculine yang."
…and if she walked, it'd be blow to Patriarchy® and cause for triumphalism.
Everything from Trans Identity to the endemic fear of COVID is rooted in emotionalism. Any empirical data that confounds emotionalism is deemed "misinformation" thus legitimizing emotion as the arbiter of "truth".
The designations of "Liberal" or "Progressive", even "Woke", are old order 20th century terms used to tribalize Emotionalist ideology. It makes 'Us vs. Them' easier to follow, but does nothing to call out the root belief sets of emotionalists.
“Since the goal is to erase the concept of masculine virtues, the new bargain the introduction of women into combat represents isn’t to have women join equally or even seriously in the fighting and dying.”