@BretWeinstein have you guys looked at this already? (apparent genomic evidence of moderna's involvement with SARS-CoV-2 origin)
(or of course it could point to only the role of moderna's 'intellectual property' in the virus origin - which may have been used without the firm's permission)
technical note "in actual fact this is RNA so should have a U in place of every T, but BLAST compensates for this automatically for simplicity"
https://twitter.com/fergie_grey/status/1482139869279395841?t=mHT7_NSdRjdd8ZKoRRXK-Q&s=19
re. the likelihood of this sequence occurring by chance:
for a single 19 base 'trial' there's a 1 in 27,4877,906,944 chance of getting that exact string.
but SARS-CoV-2's genome is ~30,000 bases long. which gives ~29,981 possible sections it could occur in (=higher likelihood)
for a single 19 base 'trial' there's a 1 in 27,4877,906,944 chance of getting that exact string.
but SARS-CoV-2's genome is ~30,000 bases long. which gives ~29,981 possible sections it could occur in (=higher likelihood)
i don't have the maths smarts to work out the final probability of the sequence appearing at least once by chance in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, but none of the online calculators i used could display a probability so low😅
"why focus on just this sequence from a much bigger genome?" (the chance of finding *any* 19 base sequence from the whole genome in one of moderna's patents is much bigger).
CTC..TAG is special bc it corresponds to a furin cleavage site, which don't occur in SARS-like viruses.
CTC..TAG is special bc it corresponds to a furin cleavage site, which don't occur in SARS-like viruses.
@pl93999060 created this annotated screengrab which neatly summarises the #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG situation.
https://twitter.com/pl93999060/status/1482031927309778954?s=20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
