1. He hid page 397 deliberately! Due to the fact that it exposes the Wahhabis and Karramis alike!
By him stating the Quran is Muhdath as in it revelation, not that it is Muhdath from Allah.
While completely ruins his ideology!
Please learn to translate because if that is what they actually said they woupd be kuffar!
They said the literal speech of God didn’t enter this world. This is a fact, but rather Jibril cane into this world. Fact!
As for his argument that it has to be letter and sound for that is the Hanbali opinion. And it is not agreed upon. And it isn’t what you say.
And many many scholar disagree with this argument!
And there is no Ijmaa that Kalam is only Letters and Sounds.
So the argument is void
In addition; The claim he makes that you can not show the Siffah if it is an ability with in the speaker isn’t accurate, for it can be visualized via its effects.
We don’t label it this way, but this clarification makes it easier.
He goes on to argue that since you can’t point to the Siffah, and the Quran is a siffah, and you can’t do that if it isn’t sounds and letters then this is assigning what can not be performed, which is unlawful.
This argument is void, as he can assign what is unbearable!
This argument that Allah can not assign that which is unbearable is actually a Mu’tazili opinion.
Ahl Assunnah; do not say Allah can or can not do something, but it is Allah who makes this decree if he will do something or he won’t.
Thus the argument is based on Mu’tazili ideas
And finally; he uses weak narrations to claim Kalam can only be sounds and letters; which he took from Mu’tazilah I mean this one right he is non existent!!
It is sad; but many people good people fell victim to the Mu’tazilah.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why didn’t you start from the top?
Where he said: Of the Hadith of the Slave girl then he was simply asking in a way that she would comprehend?!
Which by default negates the Hadith literal understanding!
He never said Above, nor does the Quran!
Why are you changing Gods words?!
Then you keep saying above above above to tamper with Shafi’is words?!
How do you sleep at night?
That isn’t what he said, please learn Arabic!
He Said: He structures a faulty premise incorrectly then builds an entire chapter on that premise.
Since you are not Shafi’i allow me to educate you!
- our usul and structure differ from those of Abu Hanifah, Malik & Ahmad.
Yes, Malik and Ahmad are closer to us, but we have major differences.
- here our Imam is explaining what he views as the problem.
- He basically said the same for Malik & Ahmad too!
This isn’t bad or a problem because they say the same about us, and we are fine with it!
- yes, most of our focus was with the Hanafis. But we have always be our best when uniting against Karramyyah!
Was #IbnHajar an Ashari?
He did Taweel.
He said Tafweed was the way of the #Salaf.
Apparent meanings were impossible.
He followed the #Ashari way in Kalam.
He clearly rejected ITs definition of Iman.
He agreed with Kasb.
Agreed with Tahseen & Taqbeeh of the Asharis.
He denied Makan and direction.
He mocked the Mujasimah and those that follow the apparent meanings.
He quoutes ashari scholars and agrees with them!
He made Taweel of:
Yad, Qadam, Saaq, ‘Ayn, Nuzul, Ityaan, Istiwaa, Wajh, Rahmah, Uluww, Maje, and many many many more!
1. He said: قال جمع 2. cropping trick; I hope you aren’t asked about it on judgment day though! 3. He started by saying:
So demolishing is wajib due to the fact that it is Haram for people to use this lnd for anything else. This my friend is called Mussabbal.
This guy is a horrible human indeed!
Let me show you why..
This guy guy actually cropped out information that changes the whole meaning !
@abuzaidtweet@LastTantrum So we can conclude; that the book doesn’t exist.
It is an obvious fabrication; for the following reasons:
@abuzaidtweet@LastTantrum 1. Karji claimed he was a student of alShaikh, he wasn’t. So either Karji was lying and I doubt that, or the fabricator was lying, I guarantee that!