That isn’t what he said, please learn Arabic!
He Said: He structures a faulty premise incorrectly then builds an entire chapter on that premise.
Since you are not Shafi’i allow me to educate you!
- our usul and structure differ from those of Abu Hanifah, Malik & Ahmad.
Yes, Malik and Ahmad are closer to us, but we have major differences.
- here our Imam is explaining what he views as the problem.
- He basically said the same for Malik & Ahmad too!
This isn’t bad or a problem because they say the same about us, and we are fine with it!
- yes, most of our focus was with the Hanafis. But we have always be our best when uniting against Karramyyah!
Shafi’i said: Everyone is reliant on Abi Hanifah in fiqh! This was narrated by Ibn Madini.
This is a praise!
Shafi’i asked Malik: did you see Abu Hanifah? Malik said yes! I saw a man that could convince you that that column over there was gold you would believe him!
How amazing of a praise is that!
Sure there are technical differences, that is normal!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with موقع المنهاجي الشافعي

موقع المنهاجي الشافعي Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Alminhaji

15 Jan
Why didn’t you start from the top?
Where he said: Of the Hadith of the Slave girl then he was simply asking in a way that she would comprehend?!
Which by default negates the Hadith literal understanding!
He never said Above, nor does the Quran!
Why are you changing Gods words?!
Then you keep saying above above above to tamper with Shafi’is words?!
How do you sleep at night?
Read 13 tweets
14 Jan
Many many issues here!
1. He hid page 397 deliberately! Due to the fact that it exposes the Wahhabis and Karramis alike!
By him stating the Quran is Muhdath as in it revelation, not that it is Muhdath from Allah.
While completely ruins his ideology!
Please learn to translate because if that is what they actually said they woupd be kuffar!
They said the literal speech of God didn’t enter this world. This is a fact, but rather Jibril cane into this world. Fact!
Read 8 tweets
13 Jan
Was #IbnHajar an Ashari?
He did Taweel.
He said Tafweed was the way of the #Salaf.
Apparent meanings were impossible.
He followed the #Ashari way in Kalam.
He clearly rejected ITs definition of Iman.
He agreed with Kasb.
Agreed with Tahseen & Taqbeeh of the Asharis.
He denied Makan and direction.
He mocked the Mujasimah and those that follow the apparent meanings.
He quoutes ashari scholars and agrees with them!
He made Taweel of:
Yad, Qadam, Saaq, ‘Ayn, Nuzul, Ityaan, Istiwaa, Wajh, Rahmah, Uluww, Maje, and many many many more!
Read 14 tweets
11 Jan
وَذكر الشَّيْخ الإِمَام ركن الدّين أَبُو مُحَمَّدٍ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ يُوسُفَ الْجُوَيْنِيّ رَحمَه اللَّه فِي آخر كتاب صنفه وَسَماهُ عقيدة أَصْحَاب الإِمَام المطلبي الشَّافِعِي رَحمَه اللَّه وكافة أهل السّنة وَالْجَمَاعَة وَقَالَ
ونعتقد أَن الْمُصِيب من الْمُجْتَهدين فِي الْأُصُول وَالْفُرُوع وَاحِد وَيجب التَّعْيِين فِي الْأُصُول فاما الْفُرُوع فَرُبمَا يَتَأَتَّى التَّعْيِين وَرُبمَا لَا يَتَأَتَّى
وَمذهب الشَّيْخ أَبِي الْحسن رَحمَه اللَّه تصويب الْمُجْتَهدين فِي الْفُرُوع وَلَيْسَ ذَلِك مَذْهَب الشَّافِعِي رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ
Read 6 tweets
11 Jan
1. He said: قال جمع
2. cropping trick; I hope you aren’t asked about it on judgment day though!
3. He started by saying:
So demolishing is wajib due to the fact that it is Haram for people to use this lnd for anything else. This my friend is called Mussabbal. Image
This guy is a horrible human indeed!
Let me show you why.. ImageImage
This guy guy actually cropped out information that changes the whole meaning !
Read 9 tweets
9 Jan
@abuzaidtweet @LastTantrum Where is the book?!
@abuzaidtweet @LastTantrum So we can conclude; that the book doesn’t exist.
It is an obvious fabrication; for the following reasons:
@abuzaidtweet @LastTantrum 1. Karji claimed he was a student of alShaikh, he wasn’t. So either Karji was lying and I doubt that, or the fabricator was lying, I guarantee that!
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(