I come from the corner of theorizing and practicing gender identity, and these young woke LGBT activists think I don't know shit about SOGIE and transgenderism. They criticize my use of "transsexual" as clinical and outdated as if it is mindless.
To me, using "transsexual" is my protest against the unwitting drowning of transsexuals to the point of erasure in LGBT. Perhaps those woke activists don't know that because they focus on seminar pamphlets and social idealism, not on the truths and realities of gender identities.
Is "transsexual" clinical? Yes. It should be because transsexuals seek medical help and take doctor-prescribed female hormones. Is it outdated? No. They still seek medical help to this day to transition and fill their hormone prescription. Transsexuality is still a medical issue.
Is transsexuality related to mental health? Yes. Childhood rejection and adult discrimination are the traumas of transsexuals. Add violence, disinheritance, poverty, and misery, of course, you will see a lot of transsexuals who experience PTSD, depression, and suicidal ideation.
Why would you deny or hide transsexual truths and realities? Maybe this is shocking: a lot of transsexuals do drugs to self-medicate their emotional pain, chronic loneliness and yes, PTSD. Drugs give them short relief and illusions that they are okay in the world that hates them.
How does "transgender" drown transsexuals? Transvestites, who are usually femme gay men who use the gender identity of transsexuals for work, fun or sex with straight men, are called transgenders. Books define transvestite differently. They're actually gay men in women's outfits.
Crossdressers, whose occasional kink is the gender identity of transsexuals in the form of clothes, makeup and roleplaying, are also called transgenders. These are usually married men who buy female clothes for one session and throw them away afterwards—scared of being found out.
Then we have drag queens who wear female clothes for performance on stage, film, or social media. They use the gender identity of transsexuals to earn money and to exercise an art form. They're still called transgenders. Yes, there are trans drag queens, but they aren't the norm.
In "transgender", transvestites, crossdressers, and drag queens are placed beside transsexuals whose gender identity is lived, experienced, and realized full-time. That's 24-7. There's no fluidity. There's no going back and forth—male-female-male or masculine-feminine-masculine.
Transition and detransition, the changing of minds or regret among transsexuals, aren't fluidity but reversal. Transsexuals for five years and back to being gay or straight men. Detransition and trans regret are common among gay or straight men who wrongly embrace transsexuality.
Perhaps you will ask why I use "the gender identity of transsexuals, which is separate from the gender identity of cisgender, genetic or biological women. That is so because the gender identity of transsexuals involves permanent transfer or movement from one identity to another.
"Transgender" doesn't benefit transsexuals. It only creates a semantic haven for gay men and bisexual men who are rejected by G and B in LGBT. In LGBT history, G and B didn't really care about transsexuals, so they placed transvestites, crossdressers and drag queens under the T.
Transvestites who are femme gay men and drag queens who are usually gay men should have been placed under G in LGBT. After all, in gay chatrooms, cruising, sex, and desire, you can read, see or hear gay men asking and looking for masculine or feminine gay men to have sex with.
Drag queens should be under the G in LGBT because their gender identity is a mere stage performance. When the lights are out, they are back to their gayness and gay lives. Why can't othering gay men accept that the gay performers they watch and patronize on stage are their own?
Crossdressers are complicated. There are bisexuals and heterosexuals who only embrace a feminine gender identity when they play Paris Hilton--changing clothes over their hairy skin and manly odor. They should be under the B in LGBT since heterosexuality is part of bisexuality.
The only solution to this ontological problem is LGBTQ. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual, and Queer. Transvestites, drag queens, crossdressers, and others whose feminine gender identity is not their daily life or lived reality. Sadly, I don't have a magic wand to change the T.
So, yes, I'll continue using "transsexual" as long as I live, my personal protest. Transsexual life is the toughest one. From transitioning to existing. From living to surviving. I can't allow anyone to place me beside this crossdressing man who is a transgender too by definition
Done.
*and Queer--transvestites, drag queens, crossdressers, and others whose feminine gender identity is not their daily life or lived reality.
*on stage, camera or social media.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THE REACTIONARY READING COMPREHENSION OF FILIPINOS
English isn't the only reason behind the poor reading comprehension of Filipinos. Even when a text uses Filipino, their lingua franca, their reading comprehension is still poor. Their reactionary reading is one of the culprits.
By reactionary, I mean two things: overreaction to anything without calm examination and hostile reaction to something that isn't comfortably familiar. We see this reactionary reading and comprehension in politics, in cultural discourse, and even in mundane chats on social media.
I tweeted recently about the positive representation of transwomen by exposing the achievers and the social shakers among them in the media. The reactions I got brought me back to my high school days when I first encountered Barthes, the purveyor of authorial absence in texts.
Hindi lang semiotics ang gagamitin ko sa pag-aanalisa sa bagong TV ad ni Robredo. Makakatulong din ang structuralism na maghihimay sa mga binary opposite para maiintindihan kung bakit patok at epektibo ang ad.
Halatang propesyunal ang mga gumawa ng ad. Siguro may manunulat pang sumali. Puwede ring may bihasa sa social psychology. Mahahalata ang husay at galing sa makikita. 'Yong pinag-isipan, pinag-usapan, at pinagdebatehan pa siguro. Walang "puwede na 'yan". Hindi rin nag-Hail Mary.
Ang istruktura ng naratibo ay nasa porma ng tambalang magkasalungat o binary opposite. Abo/itim-kalimbahin/puti. Tinik-bulaklak. Sugat-hilom. Ngayon-bukas. Desperasyon-pag-asa. Marami pa ang dapat idagdag. Basta angkop ang istrukturang 'yan sa structuralist mind ng mga Pilipino.
Mukhang hindi ito gawa-gawa. Hinalughog ko ang Aegle Wellness Center na nagbigay raw ng medical certificate kay Marcos para patunayan sa COMELEC na may sakit siya at hindi makaharap para sa pagdining ng mga kaso laban sa kanya.
Maraming mga serbisyong medical ang inaalok ng Aegle Wellness Center. Halatang isa sa mga serbisyo nila ay clinical intervention para sa mga adik at drug rehabilitation pero hindi nila lantarang sinasabi. Para sa mga mayayaman, dapat ngang itago ang pagkalulong ng mga kapamilya.
Sa Facebook post ng Aegle Wellness Center, klarong nag-aalok sila bilang kasama sa self-care at recovery na sa Medicine, may kinalaman ang mga 'yan sa addiction at mental health na pinagsabay bilang dual diagnosis. Psychologist o psychiatrist ang namamahala kahit sa drug rehab.
It's a bad idea to place the socmed campaign at the bottom of our list. Considering the pandemic, the internet users in the Philippines, and the social media influence on the political choices of Filipinos, social media is where the battle is.
Yes, a lot of Filipinos don't have access to computers, mobile phones, the internet or a social media platform, but it's possible that most households have someone, probably a breadwinner, who has a gadget and a socmed account. That's enough to politically influence a household.
There are four kinds of trolls in the Philippines. Let me enumerate the bad ones first: paid trolls who only post scripted lies and manipulated images anywhere and loyalist trolls who aggressively argue using the same scripted lies and manipulated images against their targets.
This thread, perhaps my last, will be about motivating voters to take a political stand, campaign, and finally vote for Robredo. Voting motivators will make or break her in this election.
From January next year until election day, I'll be tempering my political criticism or restraining myself from expressing my views on campaign strategies. I'm already a pariah. I don't need more othering. Kakampinks should be focusing on the right people instead of attacking me.
Again, this thread is not about my opinions or ideas plucked out of thin air but the campaign facts and events in the past I have studied and analyzed. If you itch to describe me, "a decoder of signs and symbols" is apt. That's still anthropological--to study the ways and means.
Winning election campaigns are evidence-based, scientific, data-driven and cognitive. Cambridge Analytica has demonstrated to us many times that maskipaps, nakasanayans, and tsambas and their versions in other countries are things of the past.
Election campaigns in the Philippines today should be changed by what happened in 2016--the use of social media, manipulative political communication, and data analytics. The traditional strategies before that should be deemed archaic as far as our national politics is concerned.
Robredo's camp should use Laylo's demographically arranged survey results to restrategize its campaign. This thread will do just that. I will propose probable narratives based on the numbers and suggest solutions that may weaken or neutralize them. My intent, again, is to help.