Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
Jan 20 10 tweets 2 min read
Many people are asking me about Biden's big comment today – i.e., that NATO might not respond forcefully to a "minor incursion" by the Russians.

Does it change the strategic calculus for the Russians in Ukraine?

Is it likely to invite aggression? A quick 🧵
The honest answer is "no" and "no."

It was a dumb thing to say, and it's tempting to score partisan points by dumping on the President for it.

But to pretend that this will materially affect the decisions made by Russia is simply not realistic.
When we speak about what Russia will do, to be clear, we are actually addressing a much narrower question.

Russia has a strict "power vertical" – the decision about whether and how to invade Ukraine rests firmly with Vladimir Putin.
The question is, did this comment by Biden give Putin any information with two characteristics.

1. New, i.e., something he didn't know before

2. Material, i.e., relevant to his decision about the timing and scope of Russian military intervention
Biden's comment fails both of these criteria.

First, it didn't tell Putin anything that he didn't know.

It was already well understood that NATO was fractured about how to respond to a limited Russian intervention.
This was clear from many things.

But perhaps the biggest was the unwillingness of Germany to commit to canceling the Nordstream-2 pipeline.

As well as the attempt to walk-back threats about kicking Russia out of SWIFT.

Thus, the disunity was already well known.
Second, the comments were not really material, because Biden employed such a restricted definition of "incursion."

When asked to clarify what would constitute an invasion to which NATO would firmly respond, he said Russia coming across the border and killing UA soldiers.
That definition would apply to virtually all of the RU interventions that are seriously being threatened.

Indeed, it's hard to understand what it *wouldn't* include, beyond something like purely diplomatic recognition of the DPR and LPR.
Thus, while it was certainly bad optics for Biden to mince words on the "incursion vs. invasion" question, he did not actually greenlight any plausible Russian operation.

There isn't any military option that Putin could choose with confidence it would only be "an incursion."
This isn't to say that it's not fair to criticize Biden for his comment.

It was a poor display of statesmanship, it alienated our allies, and it might well raise questions about how sharp his thinking is, given his age.

But that doesn't mean it will affect Russia's decisions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Clint Ehrlich

Clint Ehrlich Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClintEhrlich

Jan 21
The conventional wisdom is that we're headed for a second Cold War with Russia.

I disagree. We're flirting with a hot war.

It could involve nukes. Billions of people could die. 🧵
Just like before the Iraq War, there is a pro-war lobby pushing Biden to attack Russia.

They want to put together a "coalition of the willing."

Russia will be attacked if it does not surrender the territory it acquired in 2014. defenseone.com/ideas/2022/01/…
The call for war is not coming from fringe people in lonely corners of the internet.

That op-ed is from Obama's deputy assistant secretary of defense.

She says that we should, "if necessary, prepare for war" with Russia. Image
Read 29 tweets
Jan 20
My appearance on Tucker Carlson has been headline news in Russia.

Both state and private media have given it significant coverage.

ria.ru/20220119/obuza…
Why am I sharing this?

Because I believe in transparency.

I want my English-language audience to understand how my words are received in Russia.
lenta.ru/news/2022/01/1…
Some people are attacking me for my popularity in Russia.

This woman is a senior fellow at @CEPA, and she acts like the positive coverage from Moscow proves I'm a propagandist.

Read 6 tweets
Jan 20
***URGENT STATEMENT*** Please RT!

Today's @washingtonpost accuses me of having worked for Russia's government.

That is FALSE. I demand an *immediate retraction.*

If this story by @pbump is not corrected, I will pursue legal action: washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/… Image
I was a Visiting Researcher at MGIMO University in Russia.

That is *not* a paid position.

It's like being an exchange student, but at the level of a PhD.
The claim that I was involved in a Russian "think tank" is also false.

MGIMO University contains multiple think tanks – just like, for example, Stanford contains the Hoover Institution.

However, I was *NOT* involved in any of those think tanks.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 19
My segment last night on @TuckerCarlson is having a bigger impact than I ever imagined.

It's causing pro-war pundits and politicians to lose their minds!

Let's catalog their meltdowns. A thread... 🧵
First, the man, the myth, the moron, Bill Kristol:

ESPN anchor turned paranoid xenophobe, Keith Olbermann, says we're traitors

Read 38 tweets
Jan 16
The world is perched on the edge of an abyss.

We may soon see the worst combat in Europe since WW2 – killing thousands of people, and raising the likelihood of nuclear war.

It didn't have to be this way. A thread. 1/N Image
What's happening?

Russia has built up a potential invasion force on its border with Ukraine.

Recent photos and video show the Russian military pre-positioning attack helicopters and troop transports.

It looks a lot like final preparations for a cross-border assault.
Why is this happening? Russia has issued an ultimatum.

In the words of their Deputy Foreign Minister, Sergey Ryabkov:

"For us, it’s absolutely mandatory to make sure that Ukraine never — never ever — becomes a member of NATO." Image
Read 16 tweets
Jan 14
Today, many people were shocked to discover that the CIA is training anti-Russian militias inside Ukraine.

To me, it's a non-story: The U.S. military is *already on the ground* training Ukrainians to kill Russians.

A quick thread. 🧵

news.yahoo.com/cia-trained-uk…
The CIA claims its paramilitary training is only "defensive."

That argument does not work for the training performed by the DoD.

U.S. soldiers are inside Ukraine right now, preparing the Ukrainian military for combat – both with separatist militias and the Russian army.
Officially, U.S. troops are not supposed to follow the Ukrainian troops that they train into combat.

This is similar to how the U.S. started out deploying military "advisors" to South Vietnam.

We all remember how that worked out....
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(