OMG. I am being mansplained right now on the subject of solar energy.
a couple of retired white haired men are explaining to me that the Cal PUC is not following science, BUT THEIR SCIENTIFIC COMMENTS CAN FIX THE PUC DECISION. #SaveSolar
The white haired men did not submit a brief to the PUC pre-December. They did not make public comments in December. They think they can fix the PUC's clusterf*ck with comments after a proposed decision has been issued. #SaveSolar
The white haired men explain that the PUC isn't paying attn to the social cost of carbon, which one opines is the cost of direct air capture. HUH??? #savesolar
The white haired men are offering to mansplain to Gov Newsom through me. I am only a vessel for men to communicate with each other. Thanks men! #savesolar
the white haired men are now suggesting that we join @solar_rights, after I've told them that I'm working closely with @solar_rights, because nothing that women says matters. #savesolar
OMG someone asks a question to RL and the white haired men answer.
Then the questioner says: I was asking RL. And the white haired man responds before I can get a word in edgewise. #savesolar
The white haired man is upset that I have spoken for 8 minutes during this nearly-hour-long meeting. Says "this was my meeting." Mentions that he's a retired engineer. Doesn't understand how to share googledocs.
mansplainin' meeting has ended. And I'm gonna tell you what I told the white haired men: call @GavinNewsom at 916-445-2841 tomorrow AM to speak out against the proposed Solar Penalty Fee! This is out of CPUC hands and on to Newsom's desk. More: bit.ly/35aq3Qp
Oh. I forgot the best part. The white haired man made what he thought was a joke: "I don't know how you could be a Democrat with red hair."
I mean, it doesn't even work as a flirt. And it's WILDLY INAPPROPRIATE.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On a #TopSekritDNCCall right now awaiting @harrisonjaime. As always I will live tweet anything interesting. IF my questions get asked, they're all gonna start with WTF.
So far Chair Harrison is touting the Biden record: BIF/ broadband, judges, record job creation #TopSekritDNCCall
We need more Dems in the Senate. 50-50 ain't cuttin' it, says @harrisonjaime. A-friggin-men. And hold the House, and the Secretary of State positions in states, etc. #TopSekritDNCCall
I've been asking on progressive calls: why not divide #BBB into pieces? Manchin even says he likes the climate piece. Why not pass it? #BuildBackBetter
and I haven't wanted to spill the tea until now, because one answer is simply: progressive solidarity. Climate folk need to stand up for the #BBB child tax credit, and vice versa. #BuildBackBetter
hey folk, I'm going to talk a bit about the BIF that passed last night, White House spin, and whether it's a climate bill or not. And I'm going to tag it #325To1 for reasons that will become obvious.
But if you don't have time to read the whole thread, here's the short version. You can call money for roads "resilience" and sell it as a climate bill, or you can just call it an old fashioned "infrastructure" bill. #325To1
The White House and its friends are touting historical climate investments in the BIF. Fact sheet on reducing GHG emission in public transit, EV chargers, grid, etc. #325To1bit.ly/3EOU98z
on the #Tesla5000 road trip last week I had plenty of time to think about places where Tesla needs to be. And the rental car market is one of them. Short thread.
Places where Tesla is: 1. Everywhere in California cities. 2. Sheetz, which is a PA-based convenience store chain. (Llike 7-11 or AM/PM) 3. Kum & Go, Midwest-based convenience store chain. Also 7-11/ AM/PM type) No, coastal elites, you don't get to make jokes about its name.
and these are all good things. Tesla chargers are not at EVERY Sheetz or Kum & Go, but enough to provide good, highway-offramp-convenient, charging every 100 miles or so.
1. What happened: The progressives wanted a simple up-or-down vote on whether the party should continue to take fossil fuel and law enforcement money. We forced a meeting to get that vote. We did not get that vote.
1a. Instead the party chair in a carefully orchestrated power play first had the party vote on a committee to study the matter. The vote was NOT needed at all because the committee, members, and purpose had already been announced and did not need party approval. But...
On a special @CA_Dem executive board meeting to ban fossil fuel and law enforcement money from the party. I haven't said much in public, til now. @NoFossilMoney thread!
@CA_Dem@NoFossilMoney it all began when I served on a committee, henceforth known as committee 1.0, to address party finances. I lobbied hard to keep fossil fuel money out. And I won, and we wrote a report in Feb 2020.