hey folk, I'm going to talk a bit about the BIF that passed last night, White House spin, and whether it's a climate bill or not. And I'm going to tag it #325To1 for reasons that will become obvious.
But if you don't have time to read the whole thread, here's the short version. You can call money for roads "resilience" and sell it as a climate bill, or you can just call it an old fashioned "infrastructure" bill. #325To1
The White House and its friends are touting historical climate investments in the BIF. Fact sheet on reducing GHG emission in public transit, EV chargers, grid, etc. #325To1 bit.ly/3EOU98z
and in fact you can read it on twitter rather than clicking thru... #325To1
But. And there's a huge but. Here's a LOT of other stuff that is in the BIF but the WH is not telling you about. #325To1
1. $937M over 4 years for carbon capture and storage large scale pilot program. #325To1
2. $2.537 billion over 4 years for carbon capture and storage demonstration program. #325To1
3. $115M for direct air capture prizes. (this is the idea that we can put a magic damper on top of every coal plant to capture CO2 emissions, and it's...ah...purely magical thinking right now, hence the prize money) #325To1
4. $6 billion in subsidies for nuclear reactors that are not economic in today's markets. #325To1
5. Another $3.5 billion to establish four regional DAC hubs (see above for comment on magical thinking of DAC) #325To1
6. $2.1B for "carbon dioxide transportation infrastructure finance and innvovation," which generally seems to be S. 799 by Sen Chris Coons, and I have no idea what all that noun string word salad means #325To1
7. Oh, and $60M for wind and $40M for solar, both R&D and recycling, that's it, same amount for wind and solar put together as DAC prize money for one year. #325To1
8. I appreciate the WH correctly noting that all this BIF is just a warmup and the main act is BBB. And I also appreciate all the Dem gloating over the fact that "infrastructure week" turned into a Trump era joke while Dems actually got stuff done. BUT... #325To1
9. What I do not appreciate is spin that the BIF is a climate bill. #325To1
10. Analyst @JesseJenkins sums it up: BIF barely moves needle on climate.
#325To1
11. The Intercept adds: BIF creates $25B in new fossil fuel subsidies. #325to1 bit.ly/3o10eIl
12. As for my obscure-sounding hashtag, the DNC voted on a resolution authored by chair Jaime Harrison (with likely White House work) praising BIF as a climate bill. It passed, 325 to 1. That 1 was me. #RLM4DNC #325To1
In conclusion, I'm begging the White House to stop greenwashing a common or garden variety infrastructure bill and calling it a climate bill. It's ok to celebrate passing it. It's ok (and in fact NECESSARY) to demand #BuildBackBetter alongside. But don't spin. #325To1
thanks for listening y'all, and especially thx to @JesseJenkins for this spreadsheet bit.ly/2YnAYTR

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with RL Miller

RL Miller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RL_Miller

25 Oct
on the #Tesla5000 road trip last week I had plenty of time to think about places where Tesla needs to be. And the rental car market is one of them. Short thread.
Places where Tesla is:
1. Everywhere in California cities.
2. Sheetz, which is a PA-based convenience store chain. (Llike 7-11 or AM/PM)
3. Kum & Go, Midwest-based convenience store chain. Also 7-11/ AM/PM type) No, coastal elites, you don't get to make jokes about its name.
and these are all good things. Tesla chargers are not at EVERY Sheetz or Kum & Go, but enough to provide good, highway-offramp-convenient, charging every 100 miles or so.
Read 18 tweets
25 Oct
I've had a bit of time to process WTF the Cal Dem Party did this weekend. Thread, with a link to my original rough live tweeting
1. What happened: The progressives wanted a simple up-or-down vote on whether the party should continue to take fossil fuel and law enforcement money. We forced a meeting to get that vote. We did not get that vote.
1a. Instead the party chair in a carefully orchestrated power play first had the party vote on a committee to study the matter. The vote was NOT needed at all because the committee, members, and purpose had already been announced and did not need party approval. But...
Read 20 tweets
24 Oct
On a special @CA_Dem executive board meeting to ban fossil fuel and law enforcement money from the party. I haven't said much in public, til now. @NoFossilMoney thread!
@CA_Dem @NoFossilMoney it all began when I served on a committee, henceforth known as committee 1.0, to address party finances. I lobbied hard to keep fossil fuel money out. And I won, and we wrote a report in Feb 2020.
@CA_Dem @NoFossilMoney and that report was adopted by chair @rustyhicks at the March 2020 eboard meeting.

The minutes of that meeting, which iinclude that report, are not on the @CA_Dem website. Coincidence?
Read 33 tweets
13 Sep
short thread on Cal recall for national folk. Things we know but you don't. #StopTheRepublicanRecall

1. The NO side will win.
2. Earlier I'd predicted that NO (pro-Newsom) will win by at least 55 percent. Polls/ tracking show that it might be 58 to 60 percent.

Key context: Newsom beat the trashbear guy 62-38 in 2018.
3. Anything less than 62 percent, and the national media (lookin' at you @politico) will spin it as BAD NEWS for Democrats. In disarray. All that.

Even if NO breaks 62 percent, somehow it's bad news for Dems. Because Politico.
Read 8 tweets
21 Jul
Very short thread.

@ClimateHawkVote is running a survey asking our folk, among other things, their climate bill wish list. Listed 12 things including carbon price/ tax/ fee and dividend.

Survey bit.ly/3kJKF7M
@ClimateHawkVote and I peeked at early results (survey is still active). And support for a #carbontax has, to be blunt, fallen off a cliff.

Or, nosedived like a peregrine falcon.
@ClimateHawkVote A #carbontax is second to last in things climate hawks want to see in a federal climate bill.

Among 11 policies + other, it ranked 10th.
Read 5 tweets
21 Jul
this AM I went on a ranty thread on The Atlantic's latest bit of California-bashing, called "The California Dream is Dying," based on 1960s-70s tropes and whines. And I learned way too much about compounding pharmacies!
A compounding pharmacy is someone who makes their own Rx from raw ingredients. Turns out it's useful for things Big Pharma won't touch.
and in my thread I used the example of a grower of artisanal opium poppies making making morphine... turns out that DEA is OF COURSE going to regulate/ ban that.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(