Oh FFS. "Mutual enforcement":
a hard border between NI and IRL, but the border officials swap around - Irish check NORTHBOUND goods for compliance with British rules and British check SOUTHBOUND goods for compliance with EU rules.
Was there ever a more stupid idea?
1/
A. IT CREATES A HARD BORDER BETWEEN NI AND IRL.
Is a young nationalist firebrand, who objects to "Brits asking for papers" really going to be mollified by the check occurring on his southbond journey, instead of his northbound return?
I've never heard anything so dumb.
2/
B. It means asking the EU to trust the UK to enforce EU border controls. However, after 5 years of lying, lawbreaking, treaty-reneging, threats, insults & general f*ckery, the UK can be trusted to honour an agreement like you'd trust Jimmy Savile to give your daughter a lift.
3/
C. Even if the UK could be trusted (despite all evidence to the contrary), and even if NI nationalists suddenly got all gooey at the prospect of presenting papers to "the Brits" every time they return from a different part of their own island, it is a SMUGGLERS' CHARTER.
4/
There is decent chance of intercepting smugglers at the ports of Belfast, Larne and Warrenpoint. But a 500km border with 300 major and minor crossing points? No hope.
The mutual enforcement clowns have an answer to the "hard border" objection: in-market surveillance.
5/
Basically, raids on premises throughout NI to check for... what? Are they checking for illicit EU goods in NI - but that is not "mutual enforcement" - or for "UK goods going to IRL"? This IS "mutual enforcement" but how do you prove where they were headed?
What a joke!
6/
The more I look at "mutual enforcement" the more ludicrous it gets. (NOWHERE else in the world has it ever been tried, BTW)
I can only conclude it is a con; a decoy; a ruse de guerre.
The people behind it KNOW it won't work; its only purpose is to distract while...
7/
they trash the NIP and bin the GFA.
It is like a canvas Spitfire in a field in WW2 Kent. It's never going to fly, but may fool the enemy for a while.
So lets hear no more "mutual enforcement" nonsense and just fully implement the NIP?
You know - like we promised?
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Somewhere in a secure room, in a large building in Vauxhall Cross, a meeting recently took place. It went something like this:
"Stand up, M! Can't you see I am the Home Secretary!"
"Sorry, Home Secretary, I didn't see you behind the chairback... How can I help you?"
1/
"You've seen the news, M, the whole Government is topplin'; Johnson has blown it; this partyin' durin' lockdown is destroyin' us! We need a DISTRACTION!. I want the "special file", the "political file", I want the deadliest, darkest, dirtiest dirt you have on Labour."
2/
"Don't you want to holdvit back fir the next General Election, Home Sec? Like normal"
"No, dolt! We need it NOW! And it better be good!"
"Well... um... we have something on one of them, but he's a brexiter like you, Home Sec"
More detail?
OK:
"Free speech" means banning "woke warriors" from criticising Frosty on twitter (mea culpa), because nothing says "free speech" like censoring dissenting views.
How to define "woke warrior"?
Anyone who disagrees with Frosty, obvs.
"Free markets"
Yup; the man who took us out of the largest single market in the world, and left the UK as the only country whose free market is smaller than it's geographical footprint, is talking about "free markets".
I'd sooner take marriage guidance from Johnson.
Spot on, by @CharlesTannock : how could leaving the EU regulatory system in 2021 enable a vaccination rollout that was already begun the previous year? (Unless Dr Who was involved somehow.)
However, there are at least two occasions when Brexit HAMPERED our rollout.
The first occasion was April when an AZ vaccine clotting risk in younger people was found. We switched to Pfizer, but had to slow down the programme dramatically so that we would not run out before our 2nd Pfizer order could arrive in September.
If we had been part of the EU pool we would not have had to wait until September for that 2nd delivery (60M doses) all the time stretching out our original 40M doses like a grand-prix car running the last lap on fumes.
The second occasion was before Xmas when 5-11 year olds
3/
I agree with @chrisgrey on most things Brexit, but not this.
I strongly suspect that DF & BJ ALWAYS intended to renege on the oven ready deal and they only signed it because they knew a platform of "no deal" in GE19 would be fatal.
I strongly suspect that they...
1/
always planned to arrange some Loyalist violence ( much as British Governments of the 70's and 80's did with the Miami Show Band massacre, the Dublin bombing and the Pat Finucane assassination ) and use this to justify triggering A16.
2/
This also explains the strangely dilatory border infrastructure preparation in Belfast and Larne between 2019 and 2021 - why build something you never intended to use?
3/
Something is happening to do with UK/US.
In the space of a few weeks, UK has 1. On the ECJ role in the NIP, staged the biggest climbdown since Hillary's return to basecamp. 2. Handed Assange over like a lamb to the slaughter. 3. Settled 3 collusion cases in NI after decades.
1/
Now @PennyMordaunt is desperately trying to steal @trussliz 's glory, should a US trade deal happen "look! I had lunch with members of the rotary club in bumfck Alabama and Lo! Joe Biden relented!"
TBH if there is a US deal, @trussliz doesn't deserve any credit either.
2/
The guy who sacrificed most to get it is @DavidGHFrost . All that tough talk about the ECJ and now he has to walk it back. He looks like a guy at a fancy dress party as an 8ft penis who realised it wasn't a fancy dress party when the other guests arrived.
3/