There is an awful lot of money on the line in this ecosystem. Information shouldn’t be made public based on one ambiguously definitive statement made by DM from discord. Million dollar deals need more discussion and confirmation before fine details are relayed to investors.
I think it’s understandable that they did go public due to excitement at the time. From where I’m sitting it looks like a case of subpar communication from both sides. I’m sorry for everyone on both sides of the equation and am glad to see some reparations being made.
Lessons:
1. don’t go public with info before confirming absolutely between both teams.
2. If you are relaying information in private be explicit that it’s not for public consumption pending further consultation.
3. Don’t invest too heavily in early stage dApps due to high risk
1. don’t go public with info before confirming absolutely between both teams.
2. If you are relaying information in private be explicit that it’s not for public consumption pending further consultation.
3. Don’t invest too heavily in early stage dApps due to high risk
I’m also fairly certain that all of the facts of the matter have yet to be brought to light, and encourage everyone to hold off definitive judgement until they are. I understand that I will be accused of bias being part of the SS ISO, but I stand by everything I said 100%.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
