Big week ahead. One of the central questions is whether Gray presents evidence which contradicts that which the PM has told the House. There are two interventions she might focus on. Watch the videos below to remind yourself where we are and of the logic of what the PM has said.
Part 2
The most important word at play this week, as videos make clear, is the word ‘knowingly’
This is a potentially important revelation with regards to Part A, above. itv.com/news/2022-01-2…
Remember, on December 1st PM told Commons “all guidance” was following in No 10.
https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1485630610269949954
Nothing from No 10 here about whether event was within rules and therefore whether it tallies with what PM/No 10 has said previously.
https://twitter.com/iainjwatson/status/1485684871246790659
Thing is any individual part of the overall story may be explicable to the public. But one of No 10’s big problems at this point is that there’s so much to explain.
And with each revelation, and the longer this goes on, each event has to tally with what has already been said, esp with what the PM has said in the House. The possibility that that proves not to be the case (as videos explain) remains pre-eminent threat to BJ’s premiership.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
