1) Bitcoin is digital gold—a hedge against inflation and equities 2) 10% market corrections are rare phenomena 3) COVID was a boon for pandemic darlings like Peloton and Zoom
1) "Think of Bitcoin like digital gold"
This is almost a double-negative myth. Bitcoin has been an awful hedge; it's down more than the Nasdaq, making it more like a tech stock on steroids.
But as @morganhousel says, gold is historically a terrible inflation hedge, too!
So in a way, you could say that Bitcoin really *is* like digital gold—just not for the reasons that its advocates claim.
Both Bitcoin and gold are volatile assets that people claim as a useful hedge even though their long-term histories suggest the opposite.
2) Myth: 10% market corrections are rare and prove that winter is coming for stocks
Reality: Pullbacks of ~10% or more have occurred 8 times in the last 14 years.
The last seven times it happened, stocks finished up for the year.
3) Myth: COVID was a boon for pandemic darlings like Peloton
Reality: By pulling forward demand and pushing up administration costs, the pandemic took Peloton's (and other pandemic stocks') janky unit economics and made them utterly disastrous.
In 2020 and 2021, economic media ppl talked a lot about how the pandemic was ACCELERATING tech trends.
But for companies like Peloton, it accelerated doom by pulling forward demand to the point of exhaustion while pushing up cost structures to the point of unsustainability.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As far as I know, only one team in professional sports history has finished 1st in offense, 1st in defense, and also missed the playoffs.
9. Bob Beamon's record-breaking long jump in the 1968 Olympics.
Hard to think of another sports achievement so outlierish that officials had to stop the game to figure out WTF just happened and the player, upon learning of the record, was so shocked that he suffered a seizure
- the deep story of the voting rights bill
- a clinic on US filibuster history
- Biden polling exegesis
- negativity bias vs. agency bias in political media
Our discussion toward the end about news biases was one of the most interesting conversations I've had about political media in a while.
In short:
1. The press has a negativity bias (duh). 2. That's in part bc audiences have a negativity bias. 3. Media also has "agency bias."
News orgs can A/B test headlines with positive and negative frames. I've done it. It's clear that readers click more when the framing is negative. You can see this on Twitter, too.
Our (the media's) negativity bias both drives and reflects your (the audience's) negativity.
- Is this it for movie theaters?
- Why ESPN might be a bad long-term fit for Disney
- Why Apple TV+ is poised for a breakout year
@RichLightShed .@RichLightShed: By building a subscriber base twice as large as the biggest films of all time, Netflix isn’t just disrupting movie theaters—it’s changing what stars and audiences consider “movies” in the first place
If renting rights and steaming sports is such a slam-dunk deal, how come Netflix—the company with the most users and the best data— is (so far) mostly staying out of the game?
- Biden admin: wrong
- Most economists: wrong
- Investors: wrong
- Bank analysts: wrong
- Biden critics: wrong (missed the boom)
- Bitcoin bros: wrong (beat by equities post-3/21)
Everybody was wrong!
In today's ep, @awealthofcs and @michaelbatnick join to talk about why '21 boomflation—a roaring economy plus 40-yr high price growth—was the story ~nobody saw coming.
Most inflation-watchers missed the boom; most boom-predictors whiffed on inflation.
Today's ep is partly inspired by @jasonfurman, who (along with @ModeledBehavior) not only got 2021 about as right as anybody I spoke too, but also has written cogently about how and why just about everybody missed the dynamics underlying inflation