A few days ago I did a thread explaining how rich Chinese exile Guo Wengui concocted a false claim that that US is closing its embassy in China. Guo did that to try to promote his largely fictional "New Federal State of China" and associated nonprofits/businesses.
Today, Steve Bannon dutifully went along with his boss Guo's lie, calling the totally false notion that the US is closing its embassy in Beijing "a huge step for the New Federal State of China." Bannon surely knows the embassy is not closing. He's lying. gettr.com/post/pr1kny4943
What actually happened is that the US diplomatic mission in China asked the State Department to allow the "authorized departure" of US embassy staff/families who want to avoid strict Covid-19 measures ahead of the Olympics. cnn.com/2022/01/26/chi…
Bannon and Guo are pretending a request by some US diplomats to leave China amounts to the US severing diplomatic relations with it. That's a false, idiotic claim. Also they're pretending the "New Federal State of China" had a hand in this, and will benefit from it. All nonsense.
Why are Bannon and Guo telling this ridiculous lie? Because they have lots of fans in the Chinese diaspora who they are trying dupe into thinking the New Federal State of China is real/influential. That helps Guo raise $ from those fans for his business ventures and nonprofits.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Amid a pressure campaign, Squire Patton Boggs finally cut ties with a Saudi office implicated in Jamal Khashoggi's murder. Only took three years. motherjones.com/politics/2021/…
In February, an ODNI report directly implicated the Saudi Center for Studies and Media Affairs and its former head, MBS aide Saud al-Qahtani, in Khashoggi's murder. dni.gov/files/ODNI/doc…
As @BenFreemanDC pointed out at the time, and we reported, Squire Patton Boggs was at that time a registered foreign agent for the Saudi Center for Studies and Media Affairs, under a contract signed with Qahtani himself. motherjones.com/politics/2021/…
The Senate Intelligence told the Justice Department cnn.com/2020/08/16/pol… they suspected Donald Trump Jr., Kushner and Steve Bannon, may have lied to them.
Giuliani expected to be in the film, but his main role was to use his celebrity to help raise money from conservative donors, according to people involved. He was paid more than $200,000 and use of a private jet for this. motherjones.com/politics/2021/…
After his 6/20/19 interview, Barrack’s spokesman said that "Barrack’s lawyer had again contacted the prosecutors’ office and 'confirmed they have no further questions for Mr. Barrack.'"
Didn't hold up well. nytimes.com/2019/07/28/us/…
"The defendants, using their positions of power and influence in a presidential election year, engaged in a conspiracy to illegally advance and promote the interests of the United Arab Emirates in this country..." justice.gov/opa/pr/former-…
Spokesman for Barrack: “Mr. Barrack has made himself voluntarily available to investigators from the outset. He is not guilty and will be pleading not guilty.”
Volker, it seems, overtly lied in his public Nov '19 testimony (not just in his Oct. deposition justsecurity.org/67314/chart-si…) And he lied about knowing that Giuliani had pushed Ukraine for a quid pro quo: investigate Biden and you get normal relations. motherjones.com/politics/2019/…
Even now, this still matters. Volker misled not just Congress but the public about the Ukraine scandal. And his phony claims muddled the already confusing issue and fed the idea that there is no truth, just partisan assertion.
CNN's report this week on a July 2019 call in which Giuliani pressured Ukraine's government to announce an investigation into Biden wasn't just bad for Rudy. It also revealed that former Ambassador Kurt Volker made false statements to Congress. motherjones.com/politics/2021/…
In his public 11/19/19 testimony Volker said: "At no time was I aware of or knowingly took part in an effort to urge Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Biden." False. In a July 2019 call Volker took part in, Giuliani pressed a Zelensky aide for a Biden investigation.
Republicans cited Volker's inaccurate testimony to defend Trump in 2019. Lindsey Graham: “Volker, the special envoy, said there was no quid pro quo...I find the whole process to be a sham and I’m not going to legitimize it.” Jim Jordan made the same claim: foxnews.com/media/rep-jord…