Thread by @DawsonSField

Kaboom!
Read carefully, Durham's team was not requesting Baker's call logs.
SCO was trying to obtain information about call log data from FBI's Inspection Division.

Who provides call log data to the FBI?
Rodney Joffe's Neustar.

Will the logs prove false?
documentcloud.org/documents/2119…

Look at the timeline:
1/5/22 SCO trying to find out if Baker's call logs are accurate.
1/6/22 FBI ID (internal affairs) Why don't you compare the logs to the phones, OIG has them.
1/7/22 SCO to OIG you have the phones!
1/10/22 OIG here's the data from Baker's phones.

Who provided those call logs which lead to Baker being investigated for leaking to reporters?

Rodney Joffe's firm Neustar.

Who provided the fake Alfa Bank data? Joffe
Who provided data to accuse an OIG employee of collusion? Joffe

If the Baker call logs are fake, Durham knows!

In 2018 NSA had to delete millions of phone records from it's FISA database, because one or more of it's providers was adding fake phone calls into their requests for 1st hops from 2015-2018. Neustar supplies NSA with such data but no company is named... slate.com/news-and-polit…

As a hypothetical example, if FBI requested NSA to run @carterwpage's communications under FISA. NSA would then request the data from Neustar or possibly other providers. This 'error', would add phone records showing Page called a phone number that he did not.

Then after receiving this 1st Hop of data, NSA's system would request a 2nd hop on all the numbers Page allegedly called based on those phone logs.
The 2nd request would be for metadata only, but it would get all the call records for a number 'accidentally' added to the search.

This would allow the supplier of such data, if it was intentional, to then get a NSA FISA level phone records search on someone of their choosing. Allowing a nefarious actor to trick NSA into illegally spying on a person by adding their phone number.

Now what if those same nefarious actors were contractors with illegal access to FBI's NSA database?

They could then retrieve the data from FBI systems using an About Query.

Wonder who the redacted contractors are?
dni.gov/files/document…

So on 1/28/22 Durham gave the defense the original OIG forensic reports on Baker's phones.
But on 1/26/22 OIG gave SCO additional forensic examination reports conducted at Durham's request.
Once Durham has finished reviewing these new forensic reports they will give provide them.

And the chaser, SCO has now asked OIG to search additional phones in OIG's possession for discovery materials relating to Sussmann's case...

Are there any Page, Strzok or McCabe texts to Sussmann at the time Sussmann may have been framing Baker? A person can dream!