Many people running Whitehall watchdogs have spent time in or around UK intelligence & the secret state. Can they be trusted, when their careers are often cloaked in secrecy?
Even the BBC seems unable to rule out whether Gray was a spy.
Radio 4 said: “More than one person we've spoken to has suggested that Sue Gray might have been involved with the secret services.”
2. Cressida Dick -- Head of the Met
The police commissioner has a mysterious gap on her CV. She was seconded to the Foreign Office in 2015 for an anonymous security role.
Many assume the posting was cover for MI6. #Partygate
3. Simon Case -- GCHQ’s man
Case was Director of Strategy at GCHQ.
Now Cabinet Secretary and effectively the UK’s top civil servant, he was originally picked to lead the #partygate probe until it emerged a knees-up was held in his own office during lockdown.
4. Lord Jonathan Evans -- MI5’s man
This ex-head of MI5 chairs the government’s Committee on Standards in Public Life. His appointment raised eyebrows at the time given he had six other paid jobs.
We are allowed to know almost nothing about Evans’ MI5 career.
5. Eliza Manningham-Buller -- MI5’s woman
A former head of MI5 who was given a peerage, she has just been appointed chair of parliament’s “Conduct Committee”.
This body “reviews and oversees the Codes of Conduct and the work of the House of Lords Commissioner for Standards.”
6. Lord Geidt -- The Sultan’s man
A former army intelligence officer, he's meant to ensure ministers properly declare their financial interests. He’s less keen to answer questions about who paid for his private jet trips to Oman.
7. Lieutenant Colonel Tobias Ellwood MP -- The psyops man
Despite being a reservist in the army’s 77th Brigade – a secretive information warfare unit – he chairs parliament’s defence committee, a body which is supposed to scrutinise the UK military.
8. Tom Tugendhat -- The committee’s man
He chairs parliament's committee overseeing the Foreign Office. The son of a High Court judge, he studied Islam, learnt Arabic and joined army intelligence, then served in Iraq and advised Afghanistan's national security council.
9. Stephen Hawker -- MI5’s censor
Former deputy head of MI5, he sits on the censorship watchdog at National Archives.
MI5 is not required to release historic papers. Even if it did, it needn't not worry. The watchdog rubber stamps around 99% of government censorship requests.
10. Martin Howard -- GCHQ’s censor
Also on the Archives censorship watchdog, he was deputy chief of Defence Intelligence before & after the invasion of Iraq.
His last job in government was Director for Cyber Policy and International Relations at GCHQ.
Whatever such people now overseeing government got up to when they worked in intelligence, we will probably never know.
So why should we trust them to referee transparency and standards in public life? #partygate
First, he falsely says it didn't say Bellingcat is a Dutch NGO.
The article clearly states it is registered in the Netherlands. (Read our article here -- bit.ly/323X3bI)
Second, Higgins claims Bellingcat is "not a UK based organisation". In fact, Bellingcat is also registered at Companies House as a UK-incorporated limited company, with a registered office in Leicester.
Higgins has tweeted Bellingcat received funds from the US National Endowment for Democracy from at least 2017. This was before Bellingcat was registered in the Netherlands in 2018 and while it was a UK-incorporated company which it still is.
Moore said the MI6 chief giving a speech “is an important part of the way we hold ourselves to account”.
Far more important would be enabling the public to submit FOI requests on MI6, stop censoring MI6 records from national archives & being truly accountable to parliament.
Moore said what all security officials always say in every speech: threat to the UK are “growing” and our “adversaries” are “feeling emboldened”.
In other words, the security agencies need yet more public money. But the UK already has a deeply-embedded national security state.
THREAD. See our investigations into how the UK legal process has been conflicted from the start of the US attempt to prosecute Julian #Assange
The case has implications for media freedom and the US right to prosecute anyone in the world, but also for the independence of UK law
The husband of Lady Arbuthnot, Westminster chief magistrate who initially oversaw #Assange’s extradition case to the US, was shown to have financial links to the British military establishment, including institutions exposed by WikiLeaks.
Lady Arbuthnot had even received financial benefits from two partner organisations of the Foreign Office before her appointment - yet she failed to formally declare conflicts of interests in presiding over the #Assange case.
"There was overwhelming enthusiasm in the British media for the invasion of Iraq. In Afghanistan, it was only after mounting evidence emerged of fatalities that the media began to be critical", writes Richard @NortonTaylor, Guardian defence correspondent for 40 yrs
"The MoD knows how to seduce journalists, by showing off new weapons. This is something defence ministers and officials hope will also keep the military onside and stop them leaking about how bad their equipment is."
The British government welcomed the 2019 coup in Bolivia that overthrew democratically-elected president Evo Morales. It then strongly supported the resulting coup regime. Here's why. Thread.
On 19 December 2019 - the month after Morales fled the country - Britain’s Foreign Office appears to have paid Oxford-based company, Satellite Applications Catapult, £33,220 to optimise "exploitation" of Bolivia’s huge lithium deposits.
In March 2020, five months after democracy was overthrown, the UK embassy acted as a "strategic partner" to the coup regime, and organised an international mining event in Bolivia.
Said @BenJamalpsc of @PSCupdates: “This failure by the government to answer questions about arms exports to Israel is shamefully consistent with its systematic disregard of its own regulatory guidelines regarding arms exports". bit.ly/3w0S30w