Is the CIA now planning the overthrow of Zelensky? The Biden administration is annoyed with his evident lack of enthusiasm for a US-NATO-provoked war against #Ukraine. Today's Washington Post article is, at the very least, a warning to Zelensky to do what he's told. 1/
The WP writes that "top U.S. and European officials say they are growing increasingly concerned that Zelensky is failing to mobilize the country." It criticizes the criminal investigation of Petro Poroshenko on charges of treason and supporting terrorism." 2/
Poroshenko, the corrupt billionaire "chocolate king" of Ukraine, was brought to power in the 2014 CIA-orchestrated putsch in Kyiv. He has close ties to Biden and backs Ukraine's entry into NATO. One can assume that the US prefers him to the unreliable Zelensky. 3/
A "senior US official" said of Zelensky: “We’re his most important ally and he’s poking us in the eye and creating daylight between Washington and Kyiv. It’s self-sabotage more than anything else.” 4/
The WP reports that "some Ukrainian observers fear his [Zelensky's] political inexperience could prove an impediment in the crisis with Russia." It quotes the criticism of Oleksandr Danyliuk, former head of Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council: 5/
“His weaknesses: He doesn’t understand the interdependencies and complexities of global politics. He has an extremely simplified view of the way the world works." Perhaps Zelensky understands all too well the way the CIA works, and that's why he may be on the way out. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Completely absent from Professor Snyder’s “Bloodlands”, published in late 2010, is any reference to the fascist & violently anti~Semitic Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and its notorious leader, Stepan Bandera, who was allied with the Nazis in WWII. 1/
The omission was remarkable because Snyder had previously written at length in the NY Review of Books about Bandera and the Ukrainian fascist movement. Its criminal legacy, he wrote, was a major factor in contemporary Ukrainian politics. 2/
Snyder explained that the pro-US candidate Yushchenko lost the 2010 election because of widespread hatred in Ukraine of the rightwing nationalists. Before leaving office, Yushchenko named Bandera a national hero. /3
Professor Feigl-Ding, have you taken leave of your senses? As you are clearly advocating a US-NATO war with Russia, have you weighed the consequences? What is your “worst case” scenario? What will the world look like 30 minutes after a thermonuclear exchange? 1/
All the claims of imminent and inevitable war are coming out of the US and NATO. The Ukrainian president has publicly opposed these claims and urged that the US stop the inflammatory rhetoric. 2/
A really dangerous factor in this present situation is the total absence of any critical evaluation of the claims of the US government. Your own reaction, Professor Feig-Ding, exemplifies this capitulation to war propaganda. 3/
Displaying a heretofore unknown passion for political economy, Biden the scholar explained to the assembled reporters that “capitalism without competition
is not capitalism, it’s exploitation.” Actually, he’s wrong. 1/
Capitalist exploitation is rooted in the extraction of surplus value from the working class — the essential prerequisite for capitalism whatever the state of competition among the owners of the means of production. 2/
Moreover, the hankering for a capitalism where competition flourishes is a nostalgic fantasy, which did not exist even in the distant days of Biden’s youth, let alone by the time he was dispatched to the Senate by the DuPont corporation to look after its interests. 3/
The #NYTimes spells out the #herdimmunity strategy of the Biden administration: "By infecting large numbers of people quickly, it’s also generating immunity quickly. And that counts toward making #COVID19 a more manageable illness..." 1/
The author admits this may be "cold comfort" to those who get sick and die now. "As older age groups are infected things may deteriorate further, but the situation is still vastly better than if people hadn’t already accumulated some immunity against Covid." 2/
He adds: "The immunity Omicron will leave behind might well be a major step toward making Covid a manageable illness by providing more protection against future surges and variants. ... But the immunity generated by Omicron is not going to lead to the extinction of the virus." 3/
School reopening advocates and apologists invariably invoke the impact of #remotelearning on children's mental health. What they do not talk or write about is the shattering impact on a young person of a parent's sudden death due to #COVID19. 1/
"The Burden of Bereavement," published in the American Journal of Psychiatry in September 2018 - before the pandemic - examined the long-term effect of parental death. "The loss of a parent," it wrote, "is one of the most stressful events that a child can experience." 2/
The study established that the loss of a parent is for children an emotionally catastrophic event with long-term consequences. Over a 7 year period, bereaved children suffered "depression, post traumatic stress disorder, and functional impairment." 3/
Of all the vicious anti-Chinese propaganda pieces Ms. Li Yuan has churned out for the @NYTimes, this ranks among the filthiest. As always, her aim is to portray China's ZeroCovid policy -- which has kept deaths below 5,000 people -- as a monstrous violation of human rights. 1/
The article is titled: "The Army of Millions Who Enforce China's #ZeroCovid Policy, at All Costs." Her technique is to sensationalize individual incidents -- actually reported in the Chinese press -- as examples of pervasive brutality. 2/
Li Yuan cites the following incidents: 1) a man in Xi'an who failed to gain admittance to a hospital died of a heart attack; 2) a pregnant woman, with an invalid Covid test, lost her baby; 3) two security guards beat up a man who was caught violating lockdown rules. 3/