Vidyut Profile picture
Jan 31 17 tweets 4 min read
It is a good time to be glad to not be into James Bond. Turns out that James Bond is now gay.

I don't get this trend of fucking around with gender or orientation of well established characters.

Particularly those who are highly romanticized.
In many ways I see this trend as suddenly Doctor who is a woman. James Bond is gay, etc to be extremely dehumanizing and appropriative.

Fans have emotional relationships with characters. Appeal is a HUGE part of that. Screw around with gender/orientation and you fuck that up.
Superficially, it may seem like activism, but in reality, it creates a bogus "equality" by equally denying masculinity and femininity.

A man attracted to a woman is same as man attracted to man is same as woman attracted to woman, etc. It is an emotional violation.
Men and women aren't drop-in replacements for each other. They have unique qualities that are attractive to people or not.

cis/gay/het/etc would have no meaning if it meant everyone finds everyone attractive.
Using male/female here because I am a heterosexual woman. Adapt as applicable.

If I find a hero sexy, replacing him with a woman, no matter how awesome, is a loss. Or if I find a hero sexy, but turns out he likes men. Oops. Wrong number in my fantasies.
Or I may identify with a strong female character and see myself in her or aspire to be like her. Then she kisses a woman. I don't have a problem with lesbians, just that women don't excite me at all. It isn't something I want in a character I IDENTIFY with.
The truly horrifying aspect of such revisions is that it pretends to be sensitive and inclusive on gender while basically wrecking gender relationships between fans and their heroes.

If this is activism, how is this any different from narrow minded denial?
Worse, while it may work as some macabre exhibitionism of <insert activist catchphrase>, it ruins shows, it makes actors unpopular, it drives raging fans to mint money with angry videos on YouTube.

So it doesn't actually role model anything, because it is detested.
I loved the earthiness of Chris Eccleston. David Tennant is my eternal love. Matt Smith was okay, but I could squint in a certain way and carry my love for the character through his era. Peter Capaldi stole my heart in a new way.

What do I do with Jodie Whittaker?
What happens of all the attraction I feel for the character of the Doctor when she turns out to be a woman and I don't find women attractive? Worse, it seems SHE is also into women. No men in sight.

In short, Bye bye #DoctorWho, hello #GoodOmens. And I hope they don't kiss.
In contrast, I never had a problem with Jack Harkness. He's bisexual, more gay. Okay. No problem at all. I like him for many things, anyway, but never invested emotion into his attractiveness. Not my type.

Someone else may put posters of him on their wall. That is okay too.
I think it is high time changing the gender or orientation of well established fictional characters is seen as changing gender/orientation WHILE IN A RELATIONSHIP.

While empowerment is fantastic, ask the wife whose husband turns out gay (or vice versa) how attractive it is.
A truly healthy and inclusive approach wouldn't be yanking at existing relationships, but creating rich new characters for the public to fall in love with.

Then you earn from a popular show, you earn from spin-offs and you build a range of ideals and role models.
And it actually makes more sense too. What does it mean if Doctor Who is a lesbian for a couple of years with no past or future to it?

Lesbians aren't like that, you know? They aren't heterosexual men who suddenly become women interested in women - changing with the wind.
There simply is no way to go around yanking gender, orientation and also have fans build enough of a relationship to know what to expect, what it looks like, what it sounds like, what they can love and count on that character to always portray... NO ONE is enriched like this.
Tokenist activism is terrifying in the casual ease with which it celebrates dehumanisation.
Apparently this gender/orientation fuckery is a modern trend wrecking many shows.

Not digging too deep into what will only piss me off. Ending thread here.

If you know such shows, just add the tags for them as replies or comments or something?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vidyut

Vidyut Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Vidyut

Jan 29
Feedback for YouTubers from someone who watches a LOT of YouTube videos.

I am not interested in you. I don't need a map to find subscribe. Think of it as a race to hook me with information before I scroll down to unsubscribe and then close tab. Intros make me scroll.
I still don't know how most YouTubers don't seem to have figured this out. Get to your content ASAP. That is the biggest thing you can do to retain me, not random info about yourself, your daily life, asking me to subscribe before I know you are any good, some random jingle, etc
What is your video about? Start talking about that. Like right now. If your talk is good, I'll be curious to know more about the person doing the talking. If you manage to irritate me with your self-importance, chances are I'll find someone with more clarity.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 3, 2021
The 'appropriating' someone's voice argument is used so illogically sometimes that it is verging on fallacy.

A person speaking their own perspective is not appropriating anything.

It is an ad hominem attack that also adds false accusation to basically shut someone up.
Regardless of the subject. Even if it is a man speaking on women's rights, savarna speaking on caste discrimination against dalits, corporate rich fellow talking of poverty, whatever.

Own perspective is not appropriation.
OTOH, it is appropriation when someone not from that identity claims to speak what their reality "really" is. Particularly when it contradicts stated reality by that identity. This must be opposed.

The distinction is huge. One is interested participation. Other is suppression.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 2, 2021
Brumby update day 6

Ghar wapsi continues. Now with an attempt to help community (his followers) too find a good response to self harm.

Probably gets awkward when they are surprised at his U-turn
So it seems from people who do self harm being attention seekers, we have arrived at a place where Brumby is doing his best to find a better response to self harm that doesn't get him spanked.

Not bad for under a week, eh? Practically transforming as we watch.

Unfollow anyway.
All Brumby ever asked for as per today's version is that you don't glamorize self harm and he is still against wokes. Unclear why, since he appears headed there himself.

Or maybe he is just pretending.

For those puzzled by the Brumby thing, a primer
Read 6 tweets
Jun 2, 2021
Was talking to someone who may be in trouble because of disclosing too much to someone she no longer trusts in Twitter DMs.

General guide. Never ever say anything you wouldn't be happy to announce from a stage.

Hormones are the WORST "proof" of trust followed by ideology.
She approached me thinking that I say many bold things, so I would understand why she did what she did.

I say bold things because I am a bold person. My main timeline is actually more 'bold' than any private messages to anyone.
If you find yourself saying something you hope no one comes to know, DON'T. That is the only real way for no one to come to know.

DMs or WA Chats may seem private, but they are not, unless you guarantee the person on the other end will ALWAYS have your trust.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 2, 2021
Speaking of which, day 5 of the Brumby project seems to be about ghar wapsi.

Seems he is actually quite sensitive, just opposed to some, puzzling his followers...

Not even a week yet. Not bad.

Screenshots follow.
Followers be confused. So now we are against taunting and harassing suicidal people?
So we have some clarification of what he really thinks today...
Read 4 tweets
Jun 2, 2021
So I had not really intended to talk about this since the woman in question didn't have a problem.

My reason for speaking up was more that if you're making a space claiming to respect women, then respect them, not trash talk their opinions even after she disagreed first time.
The thing with this not a democracy, my space, my rules thing is that this is exactly what women go through (Which was being discussed just prior). Spaces they live in are usually controlled by men, their opinions are often trashed and their rights can be conditional to approval.
My point was that if he invited her to speak in his space, he owed her the respect of not trashing her opinions.

That said, he was fine after a topic change AND the woman in question did not mind, so it is not my place to object further beyond the space when I was speaking.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(