“I consider belief in the phenomena 2B an IQ test. If a person cannot fathom the possibility, as far as I’m concerned, they haven’t passed the test. They’re not smart enough, & I don’t want to talk 2 them about this subject area. I consider their minds closed”
3 "This was typical of the James I had come to know. To say he didn’t suffer fools gladly would be an understatement. He eviscerated them, took them apart limb by limb with the sword of intellect. I had witnessed this on several occasions. The victims were always worthy
4 "opponents, such as other top scholars from universities like Princeton. I felt bad for them because James usually humiliated them beyond the point where he had won the argument, but I also understood his motivation.
5 "He & certain members of his extended family were lifelong experiencers. He interacted with the phenomenon on a personal and professional basis. He saw the best & he experienced the worst of it."
Pasulka, D.W.. American Cosmic (p. 52). Oxford University Press. Kindle Edition.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 I think #ufotwitter will enjoy this. Joe McMoneagle is a gifted psychic, one of the most respected remote viewers of all time & was RVer 001 in the Army's RVing program at Ft. Meade, Maryland, starting in 1978. I read, "Mind Trek," when I first heard about RVing back in 1996.
2 Excerpt from "Mind Trek."
"Somewhere in my tenth year of remote viewing, I detected a subtle difference in my perceptions. At first I thought it might have something to do with what is generally referred to in the paranormal as 'the reading of auras.' The first experiences I
3 JM: "had seemed to primarily center around people.
"However, I'm not sure that I was actually seeing anything physically, so I dropped the aura concept early on. The effect simply began as a sort of knowing. Friends would introduce me to people and I would just simply know
1 How come we had never heard about the needle being found near a mutilated cow until today on @TOEwithCurt with Knapp & Kelleher?
How can that be?
I see that question being asked.
From Kelleher's 2004 book. "Brain Trust."
18 years ago.
2 Kelleher: "In one of those very rare cases where the mutilators made a mistake, Captain Keith Wolverton of the police department in Great Falls, Montana, was able to recover the evidence. It occurred when a metallic glint caught his eye as he and a veterinarian turned the
3 Kelleher: "animal over during the necropsy of a mutilated cow in a pasture twenty miles from Great Falls. Lying directly underneath the carcass was a large-gauge needle. There was really no other reason for a large-gauge needle to be lying under a mutilated cow in a remote
"I don't think anybody really knows the complete, true picture. But I will say that I sort of agree with Colm Kelleher & the BAASS study. I think this was in the book, the new book on Skinwalker, where he said, something along the lines of, 'The UFO phenomenon
2 JS: "was a lot more than nuts and bolts machines that interact with military aircraft." And he basically said it's rather myopic of us to look at it just that way, because essentially, there's a psychic element which I think is even more important than the nuts and bolts side.
3 JS: "And there's a biological element to all this. And once you get into that, and you start looking at that, that's when it becomes very strange, high strangeness, and that's when it becomes very weird and frankly, very scary. When we started TTSA, this is one of the subjects
disclosure - Gov't officials admit there are true unknowns in our air space. We have that, almost. Once they stop mentioning adversaries as a possibility, we'll be there. The general public, who does NOT want to deal w/this (fear), hear
Disclosure - High-ranking gov't official shows us craft, bodies, and shares all recent & historical UFO data, including clear evidence of non-human "occupants." I don't see that happening any time soon. Lue's 5-year guide seems about right but it
3 may take A LOT longer.
Phenomenon discloses itself - Some intelligence takes control and puts on a public display that ends the debate: We're not alone. This can be in the form of a craft (or multiple craft) hovering over a major city for several hours.
1 "The release of this information is driven strictly by the phenomenon itself."
~Dr. Eric Davis - 2019
~
@alejandrotrojas (AR): "There are these ideas out there right now that this is part of some controlled disclosure, that this has all been planned. And if that was so, that
2 AR: "would mean that you were part of some bigger plan. I mean, is that something that you feel is credible at all? Do you see that? Or is this just kind of the fruits of your efforts, all of your efforts, to bring kind of the credibility to these more...what would be
3 AR: "considered fringe areas of science?"
Eric Davis (ED): "Well, it's 2 things. It's the cumulative effect of all of our efforts, decades of efforts of hard work. But the release of this information is driven strictly by the phenomenon itself. All of this nonsense about a