The Madras High Court grants bail to a suspected Maoist on condition that she would file a sworn affidavit in Tamil owing faith and allegiance to the Indian Constitution and stating that she does not believe in Maoism. #MadrasHighCourt
Court said that in cases where people wedded to a certain ideology are involved, they do everything possible to prevent the conduct of the trial and such things remain unknown to the media or the outside world. #madrashighcourt
“On account of such dilatory tactics adopted by the accused, evidences disappear eventually leading to their acquittal. At that time, there will be a hue and cry saying that the system, without any material thereof, had kept the person in prolonged incarceration," court added.
"This is the bane of our present-day criminal justice system and we have to grudgingly endure it,” the bench of Justices P.N. Prakash and R. Hemalatha further lamented. #madrashighcourt
Importantly, the bench granted liberty to the special court to cancel the bail and remand Sathya Mary@ Padma, a suspected Maoist, in judicial custody if she adopts dilatory tactics during the course of the trial. @ISalilTiwari with details lawbeat.in/news-updates/s…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Senior Advocate Nakul Dewan appearing for amazon mentions Amazon matter stating that, we wish to file brief written submissions.
CJI- You want to complicate matter we have no issue, order is ready now you want to file affidavit, we'll have to issue notice we'll also give opportunity to other side.
I don't understand what is this practice.
Senior Advocate KV Viswanathan submits Milords we are opposing.
CJI- Mr Viswanathan you are for the other side, if you want to file, you also file.
CJI- It's a luxurious litigation it appears.
How many pages is going to be?
Delhi High Court will today start hearing a batch of petitions demanding registration of first information reports (FIRs) against several politicians for their role in instigating the #DelhiRiots.
Sr. Adv. Colin Gonsalves for one of the petitioners: We have submitted a compilation.
HC: There are prayers like provide food etc to affected families, ensure protection and safety of affected families of #DelhiRiots, these are not relevant anymore.
#Karnataka High Court to hear case of Resham Farooq, filed through her brother seeking relief on account of alleged denial by the Government PU college for 8 girl students allegedly on account of wearing Hijab before a bench of Justice Krishna Dixit #KarnatakaHijabRow
Devdatt Kamat, Sr.Adv requests for listing of fresh writ petition which was moved yesterday challenging the GO. Court permits for listing of this matter with other similar matters . #KarnatakaHijabRow#karnatakahijab
AG for #Karnataka says he is ready to argue #KarnatakaHijabRow
Abhishek Janardhan counsel for petitioner: I seek for a short date for matter milords as there are other cases coming.
J
ustice Dixit: The quantity of matters does not matter,if we decide one matter, the rest is good
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing a batch of petitions challenging provision of Prevention of Money Laundering Act. #PMLA #MoneyLaundering
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for the petitioner- In terms of the act: Use, Projecting and Claiming it to be untainted are three heads, without your Lordships finding these three heads it would be stretching of an offence to bring Money Laundering.
Singhvi: To suggest it to be diluted (the three heads) would not be a correct way of interpreting it. #PMLA #MoneyLaundering
BREAKING: The District and Sessions Court, Haridwar has granted bail to Yati Narsinghanand, the head priest of Dasna Devi temple (Uttar Pradesh) in 'Haridwar Dharam Sansad' alleged hate speech case. @ISalilTiwari reports lawbeat.in/top-stories/br…
Note: Some News portals have incorrectly reported that Narsinghanand has been granted bail in a case registered u/s 295,509,323,504, and 153A of the Indian Penal Code.
In the instant case, he was arrested only for offences u/s 153A and 295A.
Important observations by the court: 1. The court has noted that the prosecution itself has accepted that the informant in the instant matter, Gulbahar Khan, was not present at the Dharm Sansad. He filed a case only on the basis of a video he saw on Facebook.