David Chapman Profile picture
Feb 7 9 tweets 2 min read
🧠 Why is there so much nonsense neuroblather mixed into current writing about therapy, self-help, and meditation?

Think I might have just figured this out… 🧵
The supposed neuroscience invoked in explanations of meditation, emotional regulation, etc. is almost always false. But that doesn’t even matter!

If we knew the hippocampus or amygdala or whatever caused depression, it would have zero implications for self-help, meditation, etc.
Mind/body dualism is the natural human understanding. OBVIOUSLY your mind is an entirely different sort of thing, separate from the material world, independent of it except for being accidentally trapped in a body.

This is false but we automatically fall into thinking this way…
In a mind/body dualist framework, if your mind is misbehaving, you address that directly, by deciding to have different mental contents. This might not work :)

If it doesn’t, it’s logical to call on disembodied minds (gods, whatever) for aid. This may not work either…
🧐 I suspect neurobabble is genuinely valuable (even though false and irrelevant) because it dispels hope and faith in purely mental/spiritual fixes for problems that are at root relational.

Neurobabble suggests that concrete procedures in the real world can help instead.
Misunderstanding meditation, therapy, etc. as purely mental leads into fantasies that you can skip the hard real-world work they demand and into inventing your own mind-only methods for treating yourself (because who knows your mind better than you?)
Meditation methods can be painful, boring, and may make no sense. The teacher explains that repetitively scanning your body for hours deactivates the hippocampus-parietal pathway (or whatever made-up nonsense), and that gives some students the necessary faith to actually do it.
Two risks here. Neurobabble can make plausible methods that work but make no sense. Unfortunately, it can also make plausible methods that don’t work (and often make better sense). All sorts of harmful woo gets justified with neurobabble too.
🧠 Your brain is involved in consciousness, emotions, thoughts, and dysfunctional behavior. So is the rest of your body. More significantly, so are your physical surroundings, other people, your culture, and your society. 🌞

Neurobabble can blind you to that, unhelpfully.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Chapman

David Chapman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Meaningness

Jan 29
A common UX anti-pattern: software that organizes items in a user-defined hierarchy that permits only a fixed number of levels, calls the same thing something different on each level, and gives you arbitrarily different operations and UI at each level.
The generally excellent Things to-do list manager is an egregious example. It has areas, projects, tasks, and checklists, all of which are “things I need to do,” but they’re conceptualized completely differently at each level, and what it allows you to do and how is arbitrary. ImageImage
I’m struggling now with the generally excellent Discord chat/forum system, which has a fixed three-level hierarchy of containers for messages (“categories,” “channels,” “threads”), each of which has a random subset of the capabilities you’d want.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 24
🆕🔭 How the foundational crises in math and physics a century ago undermined confidence in social institutions, leading—via the anti-rational New Age and Evangelical movements—to our current chaotic dysfunctions. meaningness.com/collapse-of-ra… Image
"The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity."

Lacking a convincing theory for why science and rationality work, those who understand complex issues best may be the least likely to assert their knowledge and act decisively. Image
🗞 Current issue of my (free) newsletter explains The Making Of this post. I had been working on it for forty years, ever since my math professors started acting weird... tinyletter.com/Meaningness/le… Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 14
“A science of science” seems like it would be enormously valuable, but so far attempts have been disappointing. Michael’s analysis leads me to think we’re skipping a step. We need “the natural history of science” first.

Scientists often denigrate natural history as unscientific and uninteresting and amateurish and antiquated, but each specific science couldn’t have gotten off the ground without the extensive and careful natural history work on the same topic that preceded it.
We actually have nearly no idea what scientists do. We know what they say they do, but those of us who have done it and watched many other people do it, who have also wondered “what are we doing,” realize the concrete work is dissimilar to theory and mostly unnoticed.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 11
Where most of the resistance to public health pronouncements comes from, I think. The administrative classes keep inventing more pointless bullshit to force everyone to do, and it's past time for a revolt against that.
I used to run a tech company. Much of my time was spent dealing with accountants, lawyers, bankers, and all that. Now I find it hard to cope with the same sort of work just on behalf of my family. Taxes, retirement plans, health insurance snafus, wills and trusts....
My barely-able-to-cope may be incipient dementia, but I think it's largely revulsion. Everyone hates this stuff and it's a complete waste of time and it's forced on us by people who invent it for their own benefit and have the power to demand compliance-or-else.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 20, 2021
The rump of philosophy, the part that didn’t become science or something, is still mainly rehashing Aristotle (and Plato). This has been recognized as a terrible mistake for centuries, but they just won’t give it up and move on.
People in distress turn to Philosophy as an alternative to religion. Philosophy tells them the main thing is to figure out what it means to have “a good life.” The standard citation for this is Aristotle’s Nichomachaean Ethics.

This is a disastrous idea that makes you miserable.
You’d think after 2500 years of not figuring out what “a good life” is, philosophers might question Aristotle’s offhand idea that this is a meaningful problem.

“A life” is a malign metaphysical abstraction. It isn’t a thing. You don’t have one. You do stuff and things happen.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 15, 2021
_The Rebel Sell_, a critical analysis of counterculturalism and subculturalism, reviewed by @cshalizi . Much insight in the book; I drew on it when writing _How Meaning Fell Apart_.
@cshalizi Here’s the retrospective on _The Rebel Sell_ that @cshalizi linked. How have cultural politics changed since 2004, they ask? Subculturalism imploded (“authenticity” is no longer a thing). Social media sent us into the culturally-atomized era… induecourse.ca/the-rebel-sell…
@cshalizi I wrote about the atomization of meaning five years ago… I meant write much more… now perhaps everything I would have said is too obvious to bother with. meaningness.com/atomized-mode
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(