Who released these posters & why? Why echo the Sanghi "Hijab OR Kitab" narrative? Why "pehle hijab fir kitab', why not 'hijab bhi, kitab bhi'? 🤮 "Precious things shd b kept covered"?! NO, women are not "things", rape isn't theft of "precious things". #thread
Some (not all) of these posters & statements are old but show how "Precious things shd be covered", like "stay in your veil & the world will stay in line" "Don’t cross Lakshman rekha, you won't be raped' is rape culture, victim blaming. #HijabisOurRight struggle says the opposite
As our statement against #HijabBan says: What women choose to wear whether they choose to cover or uncover, is a matter of ‘choice’. Cannot be a measure of modesty and immodesty. True for patriarchal imposition of religious practices across the spectrum. bit.ly/3gBo6yL
To patriarchs across communities: Stop trying to tell women what they must wear in order to be respected - instead respect women no matter what they wear. That's what the #HijabisOurRight struggle is about. Sign here bit.ly/3gBo6yL
To paraphrase the great feminist educator Rokeya Sakhawat Hossain, author of Sultana's Dream parodying pardah; and a campaigner against mandatory pardah for Muslim and Hindu women in the 19th century: "forcing women out of the veil is just as oppressive as forcing them into it."
The deliberate framing of the #HijabBan issue as a false binary of "hijab vs kitab", pick one OR the other, makes me suspect the motives & politics of whoever released this poster that Republic and other bigoted propaganda channels are now busy amplifying.
I find that one of these posters at least has been owned by Farooqui Luqmaan, who says he's an @aimim_national leader. I also note that on TV he modified his stand to say "we choose both". @asadowaisi pl get him to realise & regret the "precious thing shd b covered" bit as well?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@ghazalawahab Ghazala, I’m sorry, I’m rather shocked at your position. You’re missing the Islamophobic wood for the patriarchal trees. Who has the power in this situation? It’s the principal & the Sangh not the Muslim parents. See my thread addressing various arguments & scenarios.
@ghazalawahab The argument that hijab isn’t mandated by Islam is one to be had with anyone shaming Muslim women for NOT wearing it - not with Sanghis who are denying Muslim women education for wearing it. +
@ghazalawahab As for “who is teaching them to fight for this” - they can see the unfairness & Islamophobia in the ban, & the natural & just response is to resist it not to bow down before it.
On the one hand, auction Muslim women online & threaten to sexually enslave them. On the other, deny them the right to education. That’s BJP policy. #thread on how the ban on hijab is not only unconstitutional but absurd.
Kerala HC has clearly held that it was unconstitutional for CBSE to prevent girls in hijab from taking exams. The same applies here in Karnataka. indiankanoon.org/doc/185172001/
Let’s take objections to the hijab in colleges, one by one. 1) It’s patriarchal.
Well, the official Lok Sabha site has a photograph of one of the chairpersons, Smt Rama Devi, with her head covered. Likewise MP @HarsimratBadal_; hijab/dupatta - potato-potahto.
To all those spreading communal spins, here is something I’ve learned today through members of the Bhedkut and Sansi communities: Bhedkuts are nominally Hindu but follow many Sikh practices and customs. I was directed to this website #threadbhedkut.blogspot.com/p/bhedkut-pron…
As the person from the Bhedkut community who runs this website explains “Bhedkut call themseleves Hindu but their traditions are same as Sikh Dharam . Marriages and other ceromonies are based on Sikhism” bhedkut.blogspot.com/p/bhedkut-pron…
The accused are “Naharia” and as this blog explains, that is a sub gotra of the Bhedkuts. So I was 100% accurate when I said that the victim’s family had told our activists that they & the accused were both from the Bhedkut community. bhedkut.blogspot.com/p/custom-and-r…
The age of marriage for all adults should be 18. If you’re old enough to choose a government, decide the country’s future you’re old enough to decide your own future; to marry or not. Support women’s autonomy, don’t force women to marry, don’t criminalise consensual relationships
Early pregnancies can be injurious to women’s health - the answer to that issue isn’t to criminalise adults who decide to marry. The answer is to ensure that women have the autonomy to decide if or when to marry, if or when to bear children.
For the BJP, health of young women is a mere pretext to criminalise women’s choice in love & marriage - something they are already doing through “anti conversion ordinances” & violent Sangh outfits that attack inter caste & inter faith couples.
What Ms Ranade calls “freebies” are in fact the opposite of “free = unearned”: they represent a “minimum” fraction of the wealth workers and farmers actually produce by their labour. My response to the anti Left tirade by @sonaliranadekavitakrishnan.substack.com/p/why-would-a-…
If we agree with Ms Ranade the Hindu majority was magnanimous enough to include Muslims & Christians in the idea of India, we imply it’s ok for Hindus to feel that in return for such magnanimity, the least Muslims & Christians can do is to avoid eating beef & converting Hindus.
Is it perhaps this shadow of Hindu supremacist ideology (the notion that India’s character as a nation & the rules for living in India are for the Hindu majority to decide) in secular liberal & left common sense that has helped land us where we are? bit.ly/3yv7D7k
@sonaliranade Here’s a point by point take down to all that’s wrong with your tweets: 1) Since 1920s some Hindus have demanded a Hindu SUPREMACIST nation in which others will be treated like Jews in Nazi Germany. No one has a RIGHT to such a nation.
+
@sonaliranade 2) Yet your question is pointless since Hindu supremacists have freely exercised the political freedom to demand a Hindu supremacist nation without any hurdles (barring the brief RSS ban). They have used parliamentary space to promote that agenda through hate speech with impunity
@sonaliranade 3) Just as whites don’t enjoy a right to a white supremacist nation, Hindus don’t have any entitlement to a Hindu supremacist nation. Likewise no one has a right to a Buddhist supremacist nation (like Myanmar) or an Islamist supremacist nation (Taliban in Afghanistan).