Even if Rudy Giuliani is just using the threat of cooperation with the 1/6 committee to get Trump to pay his legal bills, it's still a minor victory for the committee, bad news for Trump, and probably self defeating for Rudy.
Just to get the committee to say that Rudy is cooperating, he must have had to give them key evidence against Trump already. So now they get to use that evidence, whether Rudy flakes from here or not.
This would help the committee, and damage Trump, for obvious reasons.

It would also ensure Rudy is fairly quickly indicted for contempt, which would only make his legal bills even worse.
So if Rudy is so broke that he can't pay his legal bills to the end of the week, and is willing to get stuck with even bigger legal bills (and even more criminal charges) before much longer, just so he can pay his existing bills now, he must be REALLY be broke and desperate.
Even in this "worst case" scenario, the committee still gets some Rudy evidence against Trump, and Rudy goes to prison.

This would be a minor win for the committee, a loss for Trump, and a bad situation for Rudy.

And that would be the WORST outcome for the committee.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

Feb 17
Trump’s lawyers are complaining in court today that New York is using its civil probe of the Trump Organization to nail down its related criminal case against Trump and put him in prison. New York prosecutors aren’t denying the strategy, they’re just explaining why it’s legal.
Yet with some notable exceptions, the media and pundits are still mostly covering the civil probe as if it exists in a vacuum and Trump is only facing financial penalties. Why? Once the media admits Trump is on a clear path to prison, it can’t milk “Trump 2024” for ratings.
“Trump 2024” was never going to be a narrative in 2024. But the media really wants to spend the next year chasing ratings by pretending Trump 2024 is going to be a thing. Hard to get people to stay tuned in for that narrative though if they figure out Trump will be in prison.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 16
It doesn’t matter what Rudy Giuliani says he’s going to do, or whether he can be “trusted.” If Rudy now understands he’s going to prison, he’ll give up Trump. If Rudy still delusionally thinks he’ll get away with it all, he won’t give up Trump. Simple as that, no other factors.
"But Rudy went on TV and said..."

Irrelevant.

"But Rudy will never [blank] no matter what..."

Not how anything works.
"But Rudy is just playing games!"

Sure, if he still delusionally thinks playing games will magically keep him out of prison.

If Rudy now understands he's going to prison, he knows full well that he has to flip, and that if he plays games it won't work out for him.
Read 15 tweets
Feb 15
Now that Rudy Giuliani is fully cooperating with the 1/6 committee, we’ll hear the usual talk about whether he can be “trusted” to do the right thing. But that’s irrelevant. Giuliani CAN be trusted to do the selfish thing, which is what this comes down to.
palmerreport.com/analysis/what-…
When you look at the recent court ruling in the DOJ’s ongoing criminal case against Giuliani, it’s clear he’s going to prison for taking dirty foreign money, whether or not he goes down for 1/6 and election crimes.

The question is whether Rudy understands he’s going to prison.
If Rudy understands that that he’s already a lock for federal prison, then yes, he can be trusted to do the selfish thing of saving himself by selling Trump out to the 1/6 committee and the DOJ. It’s not about him doing the right or wrong thing. He’ll do the selfish thing.
Read 12 tweets
Feb 15
Donald Trump’s longtime accounting firm says his last decade of financial statements can’t be relied upon, drops Trump Org as a client. This gives banks a perfect excuse to call in Trump’s loans, take his assets before New York state does. It’s all coming crashing down now.
Notable: Mazars sent this letter to Trump a fees days ago, and the New York AG already has it. Suggests Mazars cc’d it to her, which in turn suggests Mazars is already fully cooperating with the NY probe into Trump.
Also notable: the New York AG almost immediately filed this letter with the courts, making it public right away instead of strategically waiting for anything. It ensures Trump’s lenders and creditors know about it.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 13
Seeing a lot of the usual talk about whether Rudy Giuliani will “grow a conscience” by testifying to the 1/6 committee and whether this will make him “good” or “bad” and whether he can be “trusted.” But this is gibberish. It’s about Rudy selfishly saving himself, nothing more.
The ONLY factor here is whether Rudy has concluded he has to sell out Trump world in order to stay out of prison. If yes, then he can be trusted to selfishly give up crucial evidence and truthful testimony. Not because he’s now “good” but because he’s as selfish as ever.
On the other hand, if Rudy still thinks he can skate without having to give up Trump, then he’ll try to bullshit the committee.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
If the 1/6 committee has to give immunity to a few mid-level Trump people in order to take Donald Trump down, then do it. Just coordinate with the DOJ so that it's done right.

The pundits yelling "bad idea!" are just trying to make themselves look smarter than the 1/6 committee.
These are the pundits who always bash the 1/6 committee for not being "aggressive" enough. Then when the committee considers an aggressive move, these same pundits always bash that idea. They automatically bash any move the committee does or doesn't make. It's just their brand.
If the committee gives immunity to Eastman, these pundits will say it should have been given to Clark instead.

If the committee gives immunity to Clark, these pundits will say it should have gone to Eastman instead.

It's an automatic rejection of the committee's every move.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(