We'll look at how this transitional crisis in the Kremlin plays into why there are troops on the Ukrainian border, and why such things may keep happening more and more....
5/56
Let's think about what's going on. We've got this guy at top, Putin - we're going to talk about his reign changing & how this is producing the dynamics in Ukraine - but let's spend a moment on the man himself. What worries him? What drives him?
Putin is obsessed with the speed of a nuclear strike. He talks about it . . . on ... and on... and on . . . What does that tell us about him and who is this man?
Putin has a sense of mission. He developed it circa 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea.
To some extent, it seems to him that Putin is Russia. We really are in the territory of tying the destiny of a nation to the will of a single individual.
Putin is not a pathological liar, but he lies all the time.
Unlike Trump, who has dispositional states more than steady beliefs, Putin nows the difference between truth and lies.
But, for him language is political technology.
Putin is over-emotional. He never forgets favours or betrayals and is exercised by them a decades after. He is often indignant, furious, or sentimentally moved.
Putin mistrusts humans - in particular, he always looks for a personal motive, not a social or institutional motive, to explain people's behaviour. He reduces too much human behaviour to power or money.
Putin is very pragmatic and very not pragmatic at once.
His big ideas are rigid, inflexible, sentimental, and conspiratorial. But he is patient, flexible and transactional about means he uses to achieve them.
Putin loves legalistic language and that's not for show.
If you had a tape of him (allegedly) approving the poisoning of Alexei Navalny, you would not hear any criminal language or instructions to kill anybody.
As an 'informational autocracy' the Putin regime doesn't use the information to justify its goals - it doesn't have goals beyond controlling the informational environment. Control over the informational environment is the regime's goal.
What kind of wars does Putin like? Putin likes the kind of war whereby you look at it & you don't know if it's a war or not.
A war that's clearly a war is informationally harder to manage. You can't just declare victory or remove it from the news cycle. #UkraineInvasion
25/56
The regime is not aiming to persuade its citizens its views. The aim of the regime is NOT to convince the population of its ideology, as was the case with the USSR - its aim is to confuse the population, and the benefit of confusion is apathy.
The Soviet regime wanted persuaded, ideologically straightened up, engaged citizens. The Putin regime wants citizens without clear views, citizens who are informationally confused, and consequently apathetic.
Second, the CEO is there illegally (in 2020 Putin organised an illegal constitutional coup). Moreover, the CEO got junior staff in the corporation to find the no 1 candidate for the CEO position, and poison him.
Imagine a ship that is called Putin. And then imagine that the captain of the ship is Putin. And he has the formal powers of the captain, but he no longer is able to exercise many of them.
The people milling around the captain are making many of the decisions the captain would normally make, and the captain acts as a kind of referee int he conflicts arising in these clans around him.
That's because, even though Putin's power is declining and the conflictive clans around him are becoming even more powerful, the symbolic significance of the office of president in Russia remains crucial. #UkraineInvasion
34/56
Putin is the only political institution that is regarded as legitimate by the population. The people who are taking power away from Putin are doing so in a way that maximally preserves the symbolism of a Russia ruled by Putin.
The fourth point about this corporation-mafia-boat structure is not just that Putin is losing power relative to the people around him - it's that the people around Putin are consciously and strategically planning for his departure!
But more likely, it could mean (3) that Putin remains in the role of the presidency with much reduced power or (4) that Putin is shifted into some other role with emaciated powers and responsibilities. To stretch this a bit too far - Putin as the Queen!
But if the Kremlin believes that current principles of security are unacceptable to it, would it abide by new principles of security of they could be negotiated?
No! Because the ideology of the Kremlin is disruption!
Russians support escalation but not war. They are not going to want the economic impact of a full scale war. Moreover, 1/4 Russians either have relatives in the Ukraine or are from the Ukraine!
And what is the regime's thinking about next steps?
They know what what Boris Yeltsin used to call a Zagagulina - a kind of adventure that distracts citizens' attention from their daily worries they are worried about it - won't work.
The second reasons is more important: Putin's sense of mission. He does have a track record of overruling warnings about economic impact form military adventures.
Russia will continue it's policy of interference in Western democracies and it's enterprise of distabilising any county engaged in the sanctions regime against Russia
You need a capacity tell apart the superficial from the profound to healthily enjoy #Pavarotti.
1967🎼 Covent Garden, 90 second listen: 1/8
A superficial thing delivered on the highest level will sometimes offer you more than a profound thing delivered OK ishly. Here is more, with #Karajan, 1967. 2/8
The superficial musical values you hear ⤴️are all Pavarotti's. The life-affirming luminosity of his sound is astonishing.
But the core musical values are all Karajan's - the rhythmical skeleton, the transitions, the long line. You are getting Karajan's marble columns. 3/8