JUST IN: 1st prosecution appeal in a #CapitolRiot #J6 case. Feds appeal to DC Circuit re: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s ruling that split sentences of a modest or lengthy jail term and probation are not allowed in misdemeanor cases. Decision: bit.ly/3uVtPaX
CKK initially sentenced Virginia Spencer to 90 days jail + 3 years probation, but after her attorney protested, agreed that split sentences are illegal in such circumstances and dropped the probation.
Some other judges have given home confinement or shorter terms in a halfway house along with probation and that practice will likely not be addressed in this appeal. Chief Judge Howell has griped about misdemeanor deals making judges choose between jail time and long supervision
One clarification: the fight is about petty offense misdemeanors, like parading in the Capitol, which carry up to 6 months in jail. In more serious misdemeanors that carry up to a year in jail, defendants are entitled to jury trials if they want them & split sentences are allowed
Why is DOJ appealing? Probably to get flexibility for judges in these petty-offense plea deals. But that’s my assumption. As with so much about #J6, official answer: No comment!
Addendum: DOJ official indicates this is a protective filing to preserve the government’s right to appeal should it choose to do so. Any appeal in a federal case requires approval of the Solicitor General and that often takes a while so sometimes government appeals protectively

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Gerstein

Josh Gerstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshgerstein

Feb 14
As jury deliberates in Palin v. NYT, Judge Rakoff is considering NYT’s motion for judgment in its favor. He signaled Friday he wouldn’t buy paper’s argument that the editorial only referred to Palin’s PAC and not to her.
He just signaled he is chilly to argument that the editorial isn’t actionable because it wasn’t literally false. Judge: 'You can also argue that Cinccinnati should have won the superbowl, but perhaps that won’t be an adequate argument.’
Still on the table, Rakoff says, is whether a reasonable juror could find by clear and convincing evidence that NYT/Bennet acted with reckless disgregard of the truth, by not clicking on a hyperlink that led to ABC article which said no link between Palin group & Ariz. shooting.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 11
HAPPENING NOW: Closing statements beginning in Palin v. NY Times libel case in Manhattan federal court. Ken Turkel is closing for Palin. Earlier: politi.co/3oFsb9E
Turkel says Palin accepted ‘insults’ & ‘jokes’ during 2008 presidential race, but by time of NYT editorial in 2017 things had changed. 'The line had to be drawn at some point,’ Turkel said. 'We can disagree but you can’t say false things. That’s where the line gets drawn.'
Turkel claims that by 2017 Palin was powerless or near powerless to rebut the NYT. 'She did not have the same platform in 2017 as she had in 2008 or even in 2011 when the Tucson massacre occurred,’ he says.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 10
HAPPENING NOW: Ex-Gov. Sarah Palin back on the stand in trial of her libel suit against NY Times. Says she was flooded with speaking and campaign assistance requests starting in 2009 and late ‘really slowed down.' Earlier: politi.co/3B7aS6s
Palin just said that NYT ‘lied…again’ in 2017 by tying her rhetoric to violence. Objection from NYT lawyer because jury is only supposed to consider 2017 statements & unclear what Palin is referring to. She says she doesn’t have specifics. Now a rare sidebar--jury can’t hear
Judge Rakoff doesn’t like sidebars b/c they waste the jury’s time but some things can’t be fully argued in front of jurors, like what they should not be hearing. Any prior stories by NYT before 2017 would be well outside the statute of limitations and are not covered by the suit
Read 30 tweets
Jan 5
NEW: Garland parries criticism of Justice Dept. response to Jan. 6 #CapitolRiot. Story w/@kyledcheney politico.com/news/2022/01/0… A few thoughts on speech….
Garland made noises about DOJ prosecuting higher-ups or inspirers, without naming names, but there's been no sign that's actually happening and there are ways we would expect to know. He did say they're following the money. May relate to reported probe of Powell-linked groups
Garland has been EXCEEDINGLY circumspect about public comments on Jan. 6, because just as he arrived at DOJ, judges were slamming prosecutors over interview acting US atty Sherwin gave predicting sedition charges politico.com/news/2021/03/2…
Read 8 tweets
Jan 5
HAPPENING NOW: During hearing on #FARA case against Tom Barrack, his lawyer Dan Petrocelli again implies politics at work in indictment. Says investigation was done in mid-2019, but client wasn’t charged til 2021. Of course, may have been politics in his non-indictment, too
Issues around classified info expected to complicate case, Judge Brian Cogan says he’ll meet privately with defense counsel in May to hear their theories about what secrets could help their case. Later, he’ll meet with prosecutors about what’s actual in government files
‘That’s great,’ Lowell says about judge’s offer to meet with defense ex parte
Read 5 tweets
Dec 13, 2021
PUBLIC SERVICE ADVISORY: For anyone trying to listen to audio feed of DC Circuit arguments in Trump v. Mazars this morning, the court advises it has had a technical glitch and has recessed to address it bit.ly/3m2s7iV
And it has added a scary exclamation point to its YouTube feed. It’s almost like an Emergency Broadcast System test. (Yes, I know that’s the old name.) I’m waiting to be told where to tune for official news or information.
And we’re back.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(