A fundamental driver of what’s happening in Russia, & has been for decades now, is the dynamic which overtakes all klepto-oligarchic leaders.
The theft, brutality & distractions have to escalate.
Why? /1.
Because with every act of grand larceny, every brutal murder & massacre, you create more reasons for more people to take revenge.
So you need more (stolen) resources, to protect yourself.
It’s very, very expensive.
Unimaginably so, to any normal person. /2.
You need more brutality to suppress & snuff out potential vengeance.
More performative acts, to draw attention away from (or, from time to time, toward) what you’re doing.
Plus, of course, there’s the off-the-scale megalomania & untrammelled greed. /3.
There comes a point in the escalation when you run out of resources you can more or less safely steal & distractions you can more or less credibly arrange.
You need new opportunities. New territory. /4.
Valuable commodities from which you can personally appropriate massive rents.
A new theatre, in which to stage dramatic performances to dominate attention.
A tank battle.
A bombing campaign.
A heroic infantry victory.
A terrorist bloodbath.
All can work very nicely. /5.
Also, successful neighbours show you up & tend to destabilise you domestically.
So you have a strong incentive to destabilise & damage them.
If necessary by forcible takeover.
Naturally, there can be major costs & risks in trying to do so. /6.
You have to choose your timing & tactics carefully.
There again, if you’re a klepto-oligarchic leader you’re also a paranoid psychopath.
No, there aren’t any exceptions to that. /7.
What would a paranoid psychopath do?
Prepare spreadsheets & strategic plans? Maybe.
Stick to them, adapting according to evolving circumstances, employing rational, mature logic & empathy?
You know the answer to that. /8.
Which is helpful.
If, that is, it’s important to you to see, through a realistic lens, what’s happening to European & global security right now.
In the midst of an acutely dangerous crisis.
Entirely manufactured by Vladimir Putin & his helpers. /9. End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
… warmongering on behalf of US aggressors, & making binary, anti-Russian judgements, faced with complex, multi-faceted conflict situations & identities.
Wait, I forgot: @STWuk doesn’t “endorse the nature or conduct of either the Russian or Ukrainian regimes”. /3.
Especially when the near hysteria of Sergei Lavrov & Maria Zakharova, now exposed in a brutal information war, does it for you.
If you’re unfamiliar with the faked “Polish attack” on Germany’s Gleiwitz Transmitter, staged by the SS as part of Operation Himmler, on 31 August 1939, start here👇
@gebjon Excellent question. There comes a point in the constant escalation when you run out of resources you can more or less safely steal & distractions you can more or less credibly arrange. /1.
@gebjon You need new opportunities. New territory. Also, successful neighbours show you up & destabilise you domestically. So you have a strong incentive to destabilise & damage them. /2.
@gebjon The need for escalation, BTW, is there because with every act of grand larceny, every brutal murder, you create more reasons for more people to take revenge. (Plus there’s the megalomania & untrammelled greed). /3. End
I’ve asked around, so you don’t have to. Or worry about the steaming piles of ordure presented as insight by much of the British press.
Private & uncensored, from EU sources with long experience of the highest levels of government.
A 🧵/1.
Russia is run by small gang of people. And they own it. Literally. They’re not a government in any sense we’d recognise. Not even one like Trump’s horrific farce. And certainly no legitimate one. But they have nuclear weapons & a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. /2.
They don’t function - or think - anything like we’re used to. They have to survive. Physically. As individuals. As a narrow clique. That’s their absolute, overriding need. To survive they need massive wealth & they have to escalate. That’s what’s been happening for 20 years. /3.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre Norway, for example. It’s doing well. You know the difference (apart from huge gas reserves). It’s in the single market. If it had treaty commitments similar to those the UK has in respect of Ireland, it’d additionally need to be in the customs union. Similarly, Switzerland. /1.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre Alternatively, they could trash themselves & help destabilise the continent of which they’re a part.
Or Serbia, as another example. Aren’t they just doing great?
Or Angola. Terrific. /2.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre But, of course, what you (probably) really mean is highly prosperous countries which aren’t in Europe & aren’t (& couldn’t be) members of the EU. Say, Canada, Japan, Australia. /3.
This from @mfa_russia@MID_RF spokesperson Zakharova (via @maxseddon) is glorious in its KGB-ness, its transparent fury & dishonesty, its dangerously malignant vengefulness.
In short, its perfect representation of Her Master’s Voice.