@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre Norway, for example. It’s doing well. You know the difference (apart from huge gas reserves). It’s in the single market. If it had treaty commitments similar to those the UK has in respect of Ireland, it’d additionally need to be in the customs union. Similarly, Switzerland. /1.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre Alternatively, they could trash themselves & help destabilise the continent of which they’re a part.
Or Serbia, as another example. Aren’t they just doing great?
Or Angola. Terrific. /2.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre But, of course, what you (probably) really mean is highly prosperous countries which aren’t in Europe & aren’t (& couldn’t be) members of the EU. Say, Canada, Japan, Australia. /3.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre The thing is, they’ve all gone to great & increasing lengths to integrate themselves into as frictionless an economic zone as they can manage, in their respective neighbourhoods. /4.
What they absolutely haven’t done is dislocate themselves. Because that would be nuts. /5.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre But maybe you mean the USA. We aren’t the USA: a continental scale mega economy & global hegemon (albeit relatively less powerful than it once was). Even they have (rightly) felt the need to engage deeply with their neighbourhood. /6.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre But set that last point aside. The US offers a useful perspective for UK fantasists. California’s economy is somewhat larger than the UK’s. It’s deeply integrated into the US single market & customs union (other than eg a few restrictions on the shipping of oranges!). /7.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre It’s a net contributor to the public finances of the federation. Its per capita income is high (about double the UK’s BTW). The insanity of ripping it out of that single market & customs union is manifest - except to a few Californian secessionists. /8.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre That doesn’t mean it couldn’t ever happen. Just that it would be a disaster if it did. Choosing to impose sanctions on yourselves, even (or perhaps especially) under cover of the purported “will of the people”, is always destabilising & fantastically dangerous. /9.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre The UK is unique in the world in pursuing a policy set to change itself from California into Belarus. /10.
@RatatoskrUK@ParisDaguerre And if you’re thinking we were never quite California & we’ll never be as bad as Belarus, I agree on the first point. On the second, unfortunately, you’d be kidding yourself.
But, on the bright side, whether we go there depends on what we do next. /11. End
Especially when the near hysteria of Sergei Lavrov & Maria Zakharova, now exposed in a brutal information war, does it for you.
If you’re unfamiliar with the faked “Polish attack” on Germany’s Gleiwitz Transmitter, staged by the SS as part of Operation Himmler, on 31 August 1939, start here👇
@gebjon Excellent question. There comes a point in the constant escalation when you run out of resources you can more or less safely steal & distractions you can more or less credibly arrange. /1.
@gebjon You need new opportunities. New territory. Also, successful neighbours show you up & destabilise you domestically. So you have a strong incentive to destabilise & damage them. /2.
@gebjon The need for escalation, BTW, is there because with every act of grand larceny, every brutal murder, you create more reasons for more people to take revenge. (Plus there’s the megalomania & untrammelled greed). /3. End
I’ve asked around, so you don’t have to. Or worry about the steaming piles of ordure presented as insight by much of the British press.
Private & uncensored, from EU sources with long experience of the highest levels of government.
A 🧵/1.
Russia is run by small gang of people. And they own it. Literally. They’re not a government in any sense we’d recognise. Not even one like Trump’s horrific farce. And certainly no legitimate one. But they have nuclear weapons & a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. /2.
They don’t function - or think - anything like we’re used to. They have to survive. Physically. As individuals. As a narrow clique. That’s their absolute, overriding need. To survive they need massive wealth & they have to escalate. That’s what’s been happening for 20 years. /3.
This from @mfa_russia@MID_RF spokesperson Zakharova (via @maxseddon) is glorious in its KGB-ness, its transparent fury & dishonesty, its dangerously malignant vengefulness.
In short, its perfect representation of Her Master’s Voice.
On 9 February @faznet published a letter from Dr Ernst-Jörg von Studnitz, former German ambassador in Moscow, former Chair of the German-Russian Forum, about protecting Ukraine’s security.
I recommend it to all, & have prepared an English translation, reproduced in this 🧵/1.
The Importance of Protecting Ukraine
Widespread concern about a possible Russian invasion of Ukraine raises the question of whether repeated Russian assurances that a military incursion is not intended should in fact be accepted. /2.
Russian military calculations regarding an intervention in Ukraine may well be going in a different direction.
There are historical examples which can be a guide to such military action. /3.