In the aftermath of the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008 there was great shock among Euro-Atlantic governments.
Our senior officials analysed how we’d been blindsided & what to do next.
Some of that was leaked.
What follows wasn’t.
Today, it’s a punch to the gut.
A 🧵/1.
Thinking of it now, after Putin’s horrendous performance on Monday, I feel only dismay.
The strategic assessment - in paraphrase- was as follows.
“The policy that emerges is not far short of a return to containment. /2.
“The hope we had in the early years of Putin that we could forge a real partnership is now definitely over. /3.
“The main difference between containment in George Kennan’s sense & the current version is that dealing with Russia is no longer the central, existential issue for the US & Europe. /4.
“So we will never get the mobilisation of resources or the unity of purpose behind a single Russia policy in the way containment focussed transatlantic policies on the Soviet Union. /5.
“It is the nature of Western countries’ relations with Russia, & responses to Russian assertiveness, that we couldn’t mobilise a full containment policy even if we wanted to. /6.
“It will be crucial to supplement diplomatic efforts with direct, internationally coordinated action against certain activities & vested interests of the leadership elite”. /7.
There’s a circularity in being at the top of the Euro-Atlantic hierarchy yet declaring the inability of your countries to implement the policy you consider necessary & for which you’re responsible.
Policy did, in fact, significantly improve for some time, to be fair. /8.
But naivety, power lust & venality of often inexperienced, sometimes well-meaning, sometimes corrupt, politicians on the make, too often intervened in the following years.
And here we are in February 2022. /9.
We’ve never come close to implementing the necessary containment policy. We now must.
It may be too late.
We’ve never come close sufficiently to hitting the leadership elite. We now must.
It may be too late.
But “may be” is no longer tolerable. /10.
All that - & quite possibly much more, & much more potentially terrifying - is essential.
Or we surrender to a brutality few countries in Europe have experienced, in over 30 years for some, over 70 for many others.
The crisis facing Europe makes an incapable, unfit PM, reviled by key international allies, an even more unacceptable threat than it already was, to the security, prosperity & well-being of GB & NI.
Code red.
Time for action, @Keir_Starmer & true political leaders.
A🧵/1.
The largest group of Westminster MPs which still supports constitutional, liberal democracy, is led by @Keir_Starmer.
He should now become PM, backed by the majority of MPs across the Commons who also do so.
Including a third of Conservative MPs.
And all opposition MPs. /2.
With the possible exception of the DUP parliamentary group. Up to them to decide whose side they’re on.
The time for party politics is over. For some years.
… warmongering on behalf of US aggressors, & making binary, anti-Russian judgements, faced with complex, multi-faceted conflict situations & identities.
Wait, I forgot: @STWuk doesn’t “endorse the nature or conduct of either the Russian or Ukrainian regimes”. /3.
Especially when the near hysteria of Sergei Lavrov & Maria Zakharova, now exposed in a brutal information war, does it for you.
If you’re unfamiliar with the faked “Polish attack” on Germany’s Gleiwitz Transmitter, staged by the SS as part of Operation Himmler, on 31 August 1939, start here👇
@gebjon Excellent question. There comes a point in the constant escalation when you run out of resources you can more or less safely steal & distractions you can more or less credibly arrange. /1.
@gebjon You need new opportunities. New territory. Also, successful neighbours show you up & destabilise you domestically. So you have a strong incentive to destabilise & damage them. /2.
@gebjon The need for escalation, BTW, is there because with every act of grand larceny, every brutal murder, you create more reasons for more people to take revenge. (Plus there’s the megalomania & untrammelled greed). /3. End
I’ve asked around, so you don’t have to. Or worry about the steaming piles of ordure presented as insight by much of the British press.
Private & uncensored, from EU sources with long experience of the highest levels of government.
A 🧵/1.
Russia is run by small gang of people. And they own it. Literally. They’re not a government in any sense we’d recognise. Not even one like Trump’s horrific farce. And certainly no legitimate one. But they have nuclear weapons & a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. /2.
They don’t function - or think - anything like we’re used to. They have to survive. Physically. As individuals. As a narrow clique. That’s their absolute, overriding need. To survive they need massive wealth & they have to escalate. That’s what’s been happening for 20 years. /3.