@maxeden99 is a typical supporter of “school choice,” which is all about privatizing and profiting off education. These folks attack IDEA and say inclusion of disabled kids in schools is “dangerous,” because they can’t profit as much off schools if forced to comply w/IDEA or ADA
@AEI neocon “think-tank” that pays @maxeden99 mightily to stan for privatized schools has charged him w/criminalizing disabled children. Only by dismantling IDEA and disability inclusion can his benefactors, school profiteers, use schools as a get-rich-quick scheme.
The whole “school choice” movement isn’t about choice for parents of disabled kids. No, @maxeden99 thinks kids like my autistic son need to be segregated & rotting in seclusion cells so his school profiteer pals profit more from privatized schools. Disabled kids cost too much.
Then he appears as a fake expert on education w/no experience in schools, certainly not ever w/disabled students, in a hearing about school safety and the discrimination faced by kids on margins. But @maxeden99 supports discrimination and abuse of most vulnerable for “safety”
Apparently safety, well-being & civil rights of disabled kids have to take a backseat to the safety of the *normal* kids. Those from whom @maxeden99 school profiteer pals can turn a much higher profit. They know if they have to be IDEA-compliant, their school profiteering dies
@maxeden99 went into a congressional hearing about punishing kids on the margins for their disabilities, poverty, race and said these vulnerable populations need to be discriminated against to keep the able-bodied, White, middle and upper middle class kids safer.
@BobbyScott@DonBeyerVA you had a witness at the KASSA hearing claiming more restraint and seclusion could have prevented the Parkland shooting. I have info and documents that prove precisely the opposite. @maxeden99 lied and I can prove he lied.
@maxeden99 claimed when schools stop criminalizing disabled kids, test scores go down. Of course they do. Not having disabled kids criminalized & incarcerated will make test scores go down. The answer is to better accommodate these kids, not to punish them for being disabled
The answer to lower reading test scores isn’t restraining, secluding, suspending, or expelling 1 in 5 kids who are dyslexic. The answer is better accommodations, and including dyslexic kids by modifying curriculum so they are included and not excluded.
I am dyslexic, I was a “behavior problem” in school. Locking me in seclusion didn’t solve my problem. Teaching me to read solved my issues. Locking disabled kids away to raise test scores solves no problems, only creates more problems. My problem wasn’t behavior, but reading
Yet the endless seclusion I was subjected to as a child caused trauma I’ve carried with me my entire life. I still often have nightmares about being secluded. It caused PTSD. Here is my seclusion story: endseclusion.org/2019/10/28/the…
There are no problems solved behind locked door of a seclusion cell. Seclusion & Restraint of disabled kids causes more problems & lifetime anxiety & trauma. @BobbyScott@DonBeyerVA *I* am an expert on seclusion. I’ve lived it and have never lived it down
@maxeden99 testified we must listen to parents, but when I confronted him on his restraint & seclusion claims, his claim that a ban was a cause of Parkland shooting w/evidence contrary to his claims, he muted me. So listening to parents mantra begs the question, which parents?
He didn’t ask me if I’ve read his book. I did read it. I am disputing his claim. He quoted a teacher at Nicolas Cruz’s school, who claimed restraint and seclusion bans caused his problems, but they weren’t in force when he was in that school
He claimed the paperwork teachers have to fill out to document restraint and seclusion is a de facto ban on these practices, yet my son was restrained and secluded 745 times and we know this because they documented it. Documenting R&S doesn’t end it.
I don’t know if @maxeden99 intentionally lied or was just sloppy about fact-checking, but he has no expertise in special education and his data analytics is faulty because of that blaring lack of expertise. Punishing disabled kids in schools makes schools less, not more safe
@maxeden99 also presented a false dichotomy. Talked about high rates of restraint & seclusion being wrong for disabled, but not Black kids, when majority of Black students being restrained & secluded are disabled being punished for their disabilities.
Black autistic children, on nat’l average, are diagnosed w/autism or ADHD 3 years later than white kids. In that time, they aren’t being accommodated, and are being criminalized for their disabilities. Implicit racial bias sees a disabled Black child as bad, not disabled.
So our schools are punishing Black disabled children at disproportionate rates for their own failure to detect disability rather than to assume it’s just bad behavior, or bad manners as @BurgessOwens stated.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“School choice” proponents wax prolific on listening to parents, but thousands of parents of disabled and Black children who’ve brought bills to Congress that end criminalizing childhood, and ending the school to prison pipeline, and they are fighting AGAINST parents. 1/5
Education profiteers, and their enablers, trying to privatize education, have a vested financial interest in dismantling IDEA, pushing the narrative disabled kids are dangerous and need to be segregated for the safety of non-disabled children. 2/5
They know children w/IEPs cost, on average, 7 times more to educate than non-disabled students in the US. In order to profit off education, they have to eliminate federal laws forcing schools to accept & accommodate disabled students, hence their goal of defanging IDEA & ADA 3/5
I’ve called/emailed @GlennYoungkin campaign starting on Oct 17, then his office as Gov-elect & Governor to plead w/them on disability rights issues. I’ve not received a single call or email back for my numerous inquiries. I can show receipts for emails I sent as far back as Oct
I guess the listening to parents mantra doesn’t extend to parents of disabled children who want to discuss why much of his ideology will cause harm to disabled kids. The listen to parents mantra of @GlennYoungkin doesn’t apply to me. How many have reached out and gotten no reply?
@GlennYoungkin what does a parent of a high support needs disabled child have to do to get an audience w/you or someone from your admin? I’ve called & emailed and received no response. I’ve been ghosted. Didn’t you win on listening to parents? You’ve yet to listen to this parent
To protect White kids from feeling mild discomfort, we can’t teach history of racism, how genocide/enslavement of Black & Brown bodies are foundation of US’ vast wealth & privilege.
Black/Brown pain is disregarded to preserve White normalcy.
To protect children from knowing about LGBTQ people, the right wants only to teach about *normal* families to prop up only hetero-normativity.
They’re fine w/bullying, double rates of depression, 4 times suicide rates of LGBTQ kids to protect normalcy of non-LGBTQ kids. 2/7
To avoid even mild discomfort, they scream, “back to NORMAL!”
*Normal* for disabled folk is getting back to not caring if disabled people suffer or die.
*Normal* for nondisabled ppl is willingness to sacrifice disabled bodies to avoid any discomfort for abled bodies 3/7
The National Council on Severe Autism is a hate group. My son would classify as what they call “severe,” but I think it’s hateful to use that word to describe human beings. @NCSAutismorg is opposed to dangerous restraint and seclusion bans in Keeping All Students Safe Act.
Before they blocked me, I confronted them about this last year, about their mistruths they tell about #KASSA, they claimed they aren’t pro restraint & seclusion. If you’re opposed to banning them, you’re for them. It’s not complicated. Read here: ncsautism.org/blog//how-the-…
Also in this article above, there’s a lot of hate speech about autistic people with higher support needs. They’re also pro-sub-minimum wage for disabled people, pennies per hour, and for exploitive sheltered workshops. It’s all in there.
@ekverstania@notanautismmom@VaHouse@autismspeaks@CASProviders@casp Linked to 3 bil dollar restraint/seclusion industry, which must exist as part of behaviorist infrastructure. They claim it’s all positive now, which begs the question, if it’s all positive, why over 1 mil incidents of restraint/seclusion since 2012 in US?
@ekverstania@notanautismmom@VaHouse@autismspeaks@CASProviders@casp Nonspeakers are not only 1 of groups most subjected to ABA, but also restrained & secluded in highest numbers. A$, NCSA, all these autistic hate groups, support ABA vociferously, and of course restraint and seclusion, as necessary parts of any behaviorist infrastructure
@notanautismmom@VaHouse@autismspeaks@CASProviders@CASP & @AutismSpeaks are cogs in the 22 billion dollar ABA industry wheel. Nonspeakers are some of their best clients. Accommodate nonspeakers & that’ll take a bite outta that 22 bil sweet cash. What’s their objection to nonspeakers being accommodated? Cash flow problems for ABA