I’ve called/emailed @GlennYoungkin campaign starting on Oct 17, then his office as Gov-elect & Governor to plead w/them on disability rights issues. I’ve not received a single call or email back for my numerous inquiries. I can show receipts for emails I sent as far back as Oct
I guess the listening to parents mantra doesn’t extend to parents of disabled children who want to discuss why much of his ideology will cause harm to disabled kids. The listen to parents mantra of @GlennYoungkin doesn’t apply to me. How many have reached out and gotten no reply?
@GlennYoungkin what does a parent of a high support needs disabled child have to do to get an audience w/you or someone from your admin? I’ve called & emailed and received no response. I’ve been ghosted. Didn’t you win on listening to parents? You’ve yet to listen to this parent
Maybe @GlennYoungkin office will return my calls if I call about my advanced placement non-disabled child rather than my high support needs autistic son, since his admin clearly prioritizes non-disabled children over disabled children.
Let me correct the record. I did get one response to my initial questions to his campaign in Oct about his agenda for disabled children. It was an ad w/a mom of an autistic son and a very vague promise of lots of special ed funding, a canned response,
When I asked that person for an email or call back to be able to ask specific special ed policy questions, he promised I’d hear back. That was 10/17/21. To date, nobody has called/written me back. So I got a response, just still have yet to be listened to by @GlennYoungkin admin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“School choice” proponents wax prolific on listening to parents, but thousands of parents of disabled and Black children who’ve brought bills to Congress that end criminalizing childhood, and ending the school to prison pipeline, and they are fighting AGAINST parents. 1/5
Education profiteers, and their enablers, trying to privatize education, have a vested financial interest in dismantling IDEA, pushing the narrative disabled kids are dangerous and need to be segregated for the safety of non-disabled children. 2/5
They know children w/IEPs cost, on average, 7 times more to educate than non-disabled students in the US. In order to profit off education, they have to eliminate federal laws forcing schools to accept & accommodate disabled students, hence their goal of defanging IDEA & ADA 3/5
@maxeden99 is a typical supporter of “school choice,” which is all about privatizing and profiting off education. These folks attack IDEA and say inclusion of disabled kids in schools is “dangerous,” because they can’t profit as much off schools if forced to comply w/IDEA or ADA
@AEI neocon “think-tank” that pays @maxeden99 mightily to stan for privatized schools has charged him w/criminalizing disabled children. Only by dismantling IDEA and disability inclusion can his benefactors, school profiteers, use schools as a get-rich-quick scheme.
The whole “school choice” movement isn’t about choice for parents of disabled kids. No, @maxeden99 thinks kids like my autistic son need to be segregated & rotting in seclusion cells so his school profiteer pals profit more from privatized schools. Disabled kids cost too much.
To protect White kids from feeling mild discomfort, we can’t teach history of racism, how genocide/enslavement of Black & Brown bodies are foundation of US’ vast wealth & privilege.
Black/Brown pain is disregarded to preserve White normalcy.
To protect children from knowing about LGBTQ people, the right wants only to teach about *normal* families to prop up only hetero-normativity.
They’re fine w/bullying, double rates of depression, 4 times suicide rates of LGBTQ kids to protect normalcy of non-LGBTQ kids. 2/7
To avoid even mild discomfort, they scream, “back to NORMAL!”
*Normal* for disabled folk is getting back to not caring if disabled people suffer or die.
*Normal* for nondisabled ppl is willingness to sacrifice disabled bodies to avoid any discomfort for abled bodies 3/7
The National Council on Severe Autism is a hate group. My son would classify as what they call “severe,” but I think it’s hateful to use that word to describe human beings. @NCSAutismorg is opposed to dangerous restraint and seclusion bans in Keeping All Students Safe Act.
Before they blocked me, I confronted them about this last year, about their mistruths they tell about #KASSA, they claimed they aren’t pro restraint & seclusion. If you’re opposed to banning them, you’re for them. It’s not complicated. Read here: ncsautism.org/blog//how-the-…
Also in this article above, there’s a lot of hate speech about autistic people with higher support needs. They’re also pro-sub-minimum wage for disabled people, pennies per hour, and for exploitive sheltered workshops. It’s all in there.
@ekverstania@notanautismmom@VaHouse@autismspeaks@CASProviders@casp Linked to 3 bil dollar restraint/seclusion industry, which must exist as part of behaviorist infrastructure. They claim it’s all positive now, which begs the question, if it’s all positive, why over 1 mil incidents of restraint/seclusion since 2012 in US?
@ekverstania@notanautismmom@VaHouse@autismspeaks@CASProviders@casp Nonspeakers are not only 1 of groups most subjected to ABA, but also restrained & secluded in highest numbers. A$, NCSA, all these autistic hate groups, support ABA vociferously, and of course restraint and seclusion, as necessary parts of any behaviorist infrastructure
@notanautismmom@VaHouse@autismspeaks@CASProviders@CASP & @AutismSpeaks are cogs in the 22 billion dollar ABA industry wheel. Nonspeakers are some of their best clients. Accommodate nonspeakers & that’ll take a bite outta that 22 bil sweet cash. What’s their objection to nonspeakers being accommodated? Cash flow problems for ABA