One of deepest conversation you may ever listen to, betw @trishankkarthik & S. Wolfram. Touches on computational irreducibility as determining free will, the structure of the universe... Covers w/o knowing: ship of Theseus, mind-body & rigid designators!
2) My problem w/ IQ
1 Can detect deficit =>shows fake corr in + domain [nonlinearity]
2 Specificity: needs to predict application (domain general). Goat faster than Ferrari in Corsican hills; no measure of speed exists w/o specific prediction.
3 Math
Stephen framed 2) with CI.
1 Can detect deficit =>shows fake corr in + domain [nonlinearity]
2 Specificity: needs to predict application (domain general). Goat faster than Ferrari in Corsican hills; no measure of speed exists w/o specific prediction.
3 Math
Stephen framed 2) with CI.
3) My own 3 ½ hours of conversation with Wolfram. We just scratched the surface.
4) Around 57:00 in the @trishankkarthik discussion he explains how computational irreducibility can only be dealt with with via negativa.
This indeed is the deepest conversation I've listened to in recent years.
And, Trishank, Zone 2 it was indeed.
This indeed is the deepest conversation I've listened to in recent years.
And, Trishank, Zone 2 it was indeed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
