SC: What had happened in the past cannot decide what's to happen now. Tell us what has happened now #BoardExams
Padmanabhan: In Dec 2021 exams were held by CBSE in MCQ method and no date has been stated for results yet. Most states have not declared the results. #boardexam2022
Padmanabhan: time limit for results declaration is important. MBBS admission is not complete
SC: Before process is complete you want judicial order. You have to approach the authorities. Entertaining such petitions only creates confusion !! #BoardExams
Justice Dinesh Maheshwari- such petitions will go on
Justice Khanwilkar: such petitions gives FALSE HOPE TO STUDENTS.
SC: We will not issue any directions
There are rules regulations in place and authorities are working
Padmanabhan: classes have not been held properly and there has been elections
SC: We know, let the authorities decided
What kind of PIL is this ?
SC: Who are you and we to decide the states. We will dismiss the petition with COSTS
SC: This plea is Il advised and premature. Authorities are yet to decide the rules and dates. If the decision is not in cosnonance with rules then it is open to challenge.
Justice Khanwilkar:: Cost laga de?
Justice Dinesh Maheshwari: jaane dijiye
Justice Khanwilkar: such kind of petitions are being filed? How can you keep on filing such petitions?
Justice Maheshwari: Such kind of Petitions only confuse the students
From publishing DEFAMATORY articles relating to @BharatBiotech
Bharat Biotech represented by Senior Advocate Vivek Reddy argued that The Wire had published articles which contained false allegations against Bharat Biotech and COVAXIN with a MALICIOUS intent to undermine the reputation of Bharat Biotech. @BharatBiotech@kvivekreddy#COVAXIN
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea seeking an alternate assessment method for class 10 and 12 board exams students instead of physical exams owing to #COVID19. The plea concerns all state boards, #CBSE & #ICSE. However SC will today hear only the CBSE board @anubha1812@advocate_tanvi
#SupremeCourt to hear Amazon's plea against the January 5 order of the Delhi High Court staying the ongoing arbitration proceedings before an arbitral tribunal over Future Retail's Rs 24,500-crore merger deal with Reliance @amazon@reliancegroup@FutureGroup
Sr Adv Gopal Subramanium: What a joy it is to be in court physically my Lord.
CJI: What is the status of the case?
Subramanium: Appeal is pending before NCLT. Pending that application has been filed to terminate arbitration proceedings. Evidence stage is over before the tribunal.
Track this thread for live account from the hearing
Yesterday, the State government told the Karnataka High Court that the petitioners were claiming that wearing of hijab was an essential religious practice, with a view to bind every Muslim woman to a particular dress code.
A plea has also been filed before Karnataka High Court alleging that the controversy is a creation of 'toolkit' to Islamise India, and has sought NIA probe