6/ This merits deeper analysis and research. Until we all begin to address these questions in public, we won't get the funding, public awareness and support needed to work on these questions at meaningful scale.
We'd better start fast.
7/ Like Big Oil since the 1970s and the U.S. since the 1980s, Russia and China now are perfectly aware of what's happening. Diplomacy is a tool of climate statecraft, but so is war. It's time to get serious in climate policy analysis. DM open.
8/ @TOClimates (+ @greenprofgreen) are very on message: understanding the international is key in climate and environmental policy—fields that have been dominated by economist and natural scientists far too long—, while understanding climate is key in IR.
9/ We are starting to lose patience. I'm rather pleased that anonymous went from "Expect us" to "It's too late to expect us" on Putin. For strange reasons, scientists seem to think that simplistic BAU analysis can capture climate change dynamics. Sorry.
), have started to believe their own wishful thinking. Slick bullshit politics like "Build Back Better," "net zero" or "momentum" will do nothing against famine & mass death.
11/ In Berlin, @carla_hinrichs_@AufstandLastGen ask whether the media understand that we face drought, multi-breadbasket failures, and global migration already THIS DECADE (0:30). (They don't.) @MuellerTadzio worries we'll lose climate focus over Ukraine.
@carla_hinrichs_@AufstandLastGen@MuellerTadzio 12/ All of this is heart-breaking. Let me make a simple observation. Current protest forms may not build enough pressure to change climate policy. I expect sooner or later new actors will enter the game, and peaceful sabotage will escalate both cyber and critical infrastructures.
@carla_hinrichs_@AufstandLastGen@MuellerTadzio 13/ As @xr_cambridge hints, historical luck has it that at least in recent history, most people who care about intergenerational and climate justice have been kind progressives who tend to stick themselves to windows and bridges rather than blow them up.
14/ If we have now entered an age of climate wars, how much longer will this historical luck hold?
15/ Beyond rational analysis, we need arts and empathy to rethink what holds us together and to rebuild the legal, socioeconomic and biophysical foundations of our lives. Time to build systems that don't self-combust within decades.
16/ Climate and renewable energy pundits were quick to use Putin's war and Germany's embarrassing role (#NordStream2, #SWIFT) for shallow talking points that show no engagement with real-world events. Insist on deep analysis. By the way, 🤣👇
17/ These questions are not abstract. As @ProfSteveKeen says, capital without energy is a sculpture. Whether physical (in Ukraine/Russia) or online, disrupt logistics or blow up Russian fuel supplies. To save lives, tanks to sculptures. 🥳
18/ On strategy. Keen observers will have smiled, as I didn't even argue *that* Putin's war is climate-driven, aside a rhetorical question (#5). But I think it's too early to tell—also this is twitter shitposting, no report or op-ed. Why it matters though:
). But wherever on the spectrum decisionmakers are, this will be *upstream* of tactics & strategy, influencing how they interpret information.
20/ Why I share this with some urgency, even though these climate-security questions would deserve a team, years or real scholarship. We may face extreme risks in the coming weeks if Putin sees no way out, as @PaulArbair lays out in this meticulous thread.
@PaulArbair 21/ If the Russian government is privy to information on Arctic climate change that we are not, which drive their strategic objectives, or timeline, in ways we don't anticipate with the current Putin focus - we may be miscalculating.
22/ I will gladly eat my words when future historians figure out current perceptions were different. But public information known to anyone in the field paint a more urgent picture than I see reflected in most analysis. I wonder why. Hence, my 2 cents.
23/ Russian attack on RWD Radon near Kyiv: "Works & installations containing dangerous forces, namely dams, dykes & nuclear electrical generating stations, shall not be made the object of attack," —@ICRC IHL rule 42 @TRodenhaeuser
@ICRC@TRodenhaeuser 24/ As things escalate in space & cyberspace: I'm not sure what the status under ihl of hacktivists is. Non-military cyber combatants as unlawful combatants may be largely unprotected. @xxNB65 and #anonymous will know what risk to take; many others won't.
@ICRC@TRodenhaeuser@xxNB65 25/ Risk of 'wormhole escalation' (@rebeccahersman) between nuclear powers will increase as climate change enters calculations. This isn't Mr. Robot; hacktivists must act responsibly.
1. The structural parallels of SARS-CoV-2 and HIV-1 were known already 20 years ago, from SARS-CoV-1. Yet COVID-19 policy and even most scientists ignore these parallels, failing to learn key lessons. Fundamentally, genetic recombination drives both pandemics—two typical articles
2. Don't worry about the specific article—there are hundreds more, and more relevant ones. The lesson here is we face syndemics, overlapping epidemics that cluster with inequity, not just distinct pandemics. All reinforce each other link.springer.com/article/10.118… frontiersin.org/journals/micro…
3. Background. There are literally thousands such articles; no one integrates them. That's why as political scientist, for years already, I've been arguing that only institutionalization can help with such complexity. We need a @UNAIDS for SARS-CoV, sorry
1. Growing bamboo is our best chance to avert climate breakdown: the plants build soil, help biodiversity, avoid GHG emissions, provide food & construction material, sequester carbon 30 times (!) faster than mixed temperate forest. Yet stunningly, no one coordinates this work yet
2. After 40 years of climate science - first AGGG, now IPCC -, everyone feels they know climate. Yet experts only really know their own field. Generalists and practitioners can implement solutions but need experts to develop them. Bamboo as climate solution is entirely unexplored
3. Last time atmospheric carbon content was as high as today, 16 million years ago, Earth was >3°C warmer than today, the Arctic was ice free, and Iceland had a subtropical climate. People think they know what climate change means, but most really don't. mdpi.com/2673-4834/5/2/…
We’ve shared this for years, it was known or suspected even before the pandemic from SARS-CoV-1. Friends of we’re going to learn at this rate, ignoring prepandemic science, populations worldwide will get into serious trouble
I'd like to delete my account, but then a sizable fraction of the early Covid twitter scicomm documentation - to show what was known when - would be gone. As far as I know, no one else with even a moderately sized account (>10k followers) shares the same readily available science
“Bamboo is our best chance to slow climate breakdown. It can replace drivers of GHG emissions and biodiversity loss (food, construction, concrete, plastic), build soil & allow regrowing rainforest." - Let's test it. Grow bamboo as blueprint for a future ecological civilization 🧵
2. Giant bamboo dwarfs trees. As grass, it grows 30 times (!) faster and can be harvested every year. Timber takes decades; too slow. Stunningly, no one in the west described the unique climate mitigation potential of bamboo yet. - Note the rhizome system:
3. Climate relevant will be the use in millions of ha of plantations, just like other economically important crops. After two months on this, some significant progress: air pot kindly donated 1 m of their professional U system, so I can test it for bamboo.
SARS-CoV-2 reminder: The more immune compromised the population, the less symptoms, the ‘milder’ it appears, the more severe it really is (=Long Covid, long term damage). That’s what even most scientists seem not to get
Thanks for vivid discussion everyone. It really is a fundamentally important point. Since I deleted most references for lack of structure (and frankly, just being fed up repeating the same points for 3 to 4 years), I'll look for new references that must have been published by now
1. "Bamboo is our best chance to slow climate breakdown: it sustains societies, can protect soil and store carbon for 100 years in food, construction, bio-concrete and plastic." - Let’s test this. As our very German neighbors renew their English Gardens, we start growing bamboo👇
2. Three months ago I started on bamboo: no one else in Europe seemed to have systematically analyzed or even considered its global climate mitigation potential when used as agricultural crop rather than natural forests, which do little climate mitigation.
3. A bamboo focus isn't for the coming years. We are at least a decade early. However, since getting started will take decades, now is a good time. In 10 years, atmospheric CO2 will exceed 450 ppm. That's enough to fundamentally transform the Earth system.