Thread by @BillyBostickson

Great response by @daniel_corcos

"I would be surprised you could find many scientists convinced by a circular reasoning which is not their own"

https://twitter.com/sciencecohen/status/1497957724017074178

useful thread by @Drinkwater5Reed

https://twitter.com/Drinkwater5Reed/status/1497822789704634371

Statistical chicanery analysed by @gdemaneuf

https://twitter.com/gdemaneuf/status/1497751757895581696

and a false analogy by @stuartdjneil trying to "pump up the volume" nicely exposed by @gdemaneuf

https://twitter.com/gdemaneuf/status/1497781822813466625

Selection bias perfectly summed up by @cdjstrydom

https://twitter.com/cdjstrydom/status/1497895650226147331

A further devastating critique by @CharlesRixey

https://twitter.com/CharlesRixey/status/1497735434214035463

Please DM @sciencecohen as he asked for it ;)

https://twitter.com/sciencecohen/status/1497957724017074178

more on bias confirmation by @gdemaneuf

https://twitter.com/gdemaneuf/status/1497841149368991744

If I've missed any useful critiques of the two preprints broadcast by @MichaelWorobey recently

https://twitter.com/MichaelWorobey/status/1497607313397481472

Please let me know and I can add them to this growing thread while we all wait for the definitive #DRASTIC early cases paper 🙄

Quote of the Day by @notoriousFIL

https://twitter.com/notoriousFIL/status/1497784363135680516

I haven't got time for any lengthy critique myself, so this will have to do

https://twitter.com/BillyBostickson/status/1498030659671306240

@RogerPielkeJr raises an important question

https://twitter.com/RogerPielkeJr/status/1497990912302931969

Another useful thread from @CharlesRixey

https://twitter.com/CharlesRixey/status/1498077308015591427