JesseJenkins Profile picture
Feb 28 13 tweets 7 min read
NEW TODAY: REPEATProject.org report offers most comprehensive analysis yet of impacts of congressional budget & infrastructure bills, detailing impacts on CO2, investment, household energy costs, energy related jobs, public health, and more: repeatproject.org/docs/REPEAT_Su… ImageImageImageImage
We model in detail impacts of the #BuildBackBetter Act (BBBA) now stalled in the Senate.
We also model the Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act (IIJA), now law, which we find would leave annual greenhouse gas emissions 1.3 billion tons short of the nation’s 2030 climate goals. Image
Indeed, we conclude that the bipartisan infrastructure law (IIJA) delivers just 9% of the emissions reductions (relative to a Frozen Policies benchmark) needed to reach 2030 US climate goals, leaving a yawning gap unlikely to be bridged by executive action and state policy alone. Image
As President Biden prepares to deliver his SOTU, our analysis makes it clear that Congress has only started laying the foundations w/IIJA, while passing something like the clean energy package in BBBA is critical to truly build the cleaner and more secure energy economy we need.
BBBA would also lower 2030 US energy expenditures by 6.6%, an annual savings of $67 billion dollars for households, businesses and industry, shifting costs from energy bills to the progressive federal tax base, lowering U.S. energy costs and helping counteract inflation. Image
BBBA would deliver about $300 per year in lower energy costs for the average U.S. household relative to costs under IIJA alone, cutting costs for households across all regions of the country. Image
Passing BBBA would also increase cumulative capital investment in energy supply infrastructure by >$1.5 trillion from 2023-2030, relative to passage of the IIJA alone. That includes 10x increase in annual investment in CCUS, 3x in hydrogen & 2x in wind & solar (+$200b/yr) in 2030 Image
All that investment means ~2 million more net jobs in energy supply sectors in 2030. That includes >1 million manufacturing jobs, mostly in wind turbine & solar PV components & assembly, supported by new manufacturing tax credits & bonus incentives to "Buy American" in the bill. Image
Note that the above analysis does NOT include even more manufacturing jobs in steel and aluminum sectors to supply inputs for solar PV, wind turbine and grid related infrastructure investments, also incentivized by BBBA's bonus tax credits for domestic content.
A big shift to cleaner energy under BBBA also avoids 24,000 additional deaths from exposure to fine particulate pollution from energy activities through 2030 vs IIJA (estimated at $213B in avoided damages). That means a cleaner, healthier America for ourselves and our children. Image
Finally, with Putin's assault on Ukraine, energy has become a central front in the conflict w/Russia. Surging US investment in EVs & heat pumps could cut oil use in transport by ~1/3rd & gas use in buildings by ~1/5th by 2030, freeing up U.S. oil & gas for export to our EU allies ImageImageImage
We'll have more on what the REPEAT Project study implies for the rapidly shifting geopolitics of energy later this week. For now, you can find all of this + MUCH more at our repeatproject.org incl. a detailed data portal to access all quantitative outcomes under each policy
Thanks to @Hewlett_Found for financial support of REPEAT Project & to the rest of the team, including @ErinNMayfield, @evolved_energy, @NehaSPatankar @gschivley + everyone else! This was a huge effort! And we're not done yet. We'll keep focused on evolving federal bills & regs... Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JesseJenkins

JesseJenkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JesseJenkins

Feb 28
As examples of what you can do with the interactive data portal released today repeatproject.org...

1. Here's a comparison of how many jobs are created under Build Back Better Act vs the Infrastructure Bill (IIJA) repeatproject.org/policies?compa… Image
You can freely toggle which policy or benchmark scenarios to compare. You can automatically see differences in absolute units or percentage terms. And you can filter on a variety of category and subcategory types to access (and share with 'sticky' URL) the data you want.
You can also download all data as .csv and toggle between comparison mode and time series mode for each policy. For example, here's GHG emissions for BBBA vs IIJA (repeatproject.org/policies?compa…) and a Net-Zero Pathway benchmark, and in time series mode (repeatproject.org/policies?compa…). ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Feb 27
Germany is weighing whether to extend the life-span of its remaining nuclear power plants as a way to secure the country's energy supply in the face of uncertainty over Russian gas supplies, the country's economy minister said today. Fast moving situation.
reuters.com/world/europe/g…
A short thread with some numbers on this, assembled with some help from friends on Twitter and off, which is one of several levers that the West can and should use to free Europe of Russian gas dependence and it's geopolitical consequences...
The remaining 3 German nuclear plants – Emsland, Isar & Nelkarwestheim – have combined capacity of 4055 GW or 32 TWh/yr @ 90% capacity factor. Assuming displaces modern combined cycle gas plant, at 7.43 cf/kwh, Germany can avoid .237 Tcf of gas consumption /yr by delaying closure
Read 7 tweets
Feb 26
@east_winds Yeah it seems to be the consensus amongst geopolitics of energy folks that oil is the bigger "prize" for Russia, and I consider that valid. Still, here's why I think natural gas matters so much...
@east_winds 1. Most of Russia's oil goes to China & Asia. Most of Russia goes to Europe. Tankers are easy to reroute. Oil pipelines are fixed. So cutting gas exports to Europe could leave Russia with oversupply, and cratering gas prices.
@east_winds 2. For same reason, Europe is far more dependent on Russian gas than oil, since it's harder to find alternative supply. This gives Putin way more geopolitical leverage than from oil. Freeing EU from that leverage is key to enable more robust Western sanctions incl on Russian oil.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 26
EU gas experts: how long into the spring before EU can afford to cut off all Russian imports of gas? I imagine in winter on short notice that is problematic, but as weather warms, can EU go entirely without Russian imports?

@JasonBordoff @AmyJaffeenergy @DxGordon
As Europe enters Spring, and with surge of US LNG and bunkering for next winter, plus a conservation push similar to Japan after Fukushima, could Europe prepare for next winter without Russia?
Should America launch a natural gas conservation effort in solidarity, to free up exports? A "Lend-Lease Act moment" for the 21st century?
Read 5 tweets
Jan 28
New @NatureEnergyJnl paper w/@HarrisonGFell @mmildenberger & @gilbeaq critically reviews @BenjaminSovaco1 et al's claims there's scant empirical evidence nuclear power is associated w/lower CO2. Turns out: there's plenty evidence if you know how to look. rdcu.be/cFUSJ
The Sovacool et al. paper, which made the rounds in October 2020, used cross-sectional regression analysis to test associations between nuclear & renewable deployment across different countries and national carbon dioxide pollution levels. See nature.com/articles/s4156…
Sovacool et al. claimed to "find that larger-scale national nuclear attachments do not tend to associate with significantly lower [CO2] while renewables do." AKA, there's no clear empirical link betwen ⬆️ nuclear & ⬇️ CO2 calling into question nuclear's role in climate mitigation
Read 24 tweets
Dec 20, 2021
"The stakes here are incredibly high. Passing #BuildBackBetter would lower energy costs and secure both the US's climate goals and its global competitiveness in some of the most important industries of the 21st century. Failure would cost Americans dearly."

My statement ⤵️
Enacting the clean energy investments in the Build Back Better Act would cut U.S greenhouse gas emissions by a cumulative 5 billion tons (CO2-equivalent) by 2030 and put the US within easy reach of President Biden's commitment to cut emissions to half of peak levels by 2030.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(