"The stakes here are incredibly high. Passing #BuildBackBetter would lower energy costs and secure both the US's climate goals and its global competitiveness in some of the most important industries of the 21st century. Failure would cost Americans dearly."
Enacting the clean energy investments in the Build Back Better Act would cut U.S greenhouse gas emissions by a cumulative 5 billion tons (CO2-equivalent) by 2030 and put the US within easy reach of President Biden's commitment to cut emissions to half of peak levels by 2030.
Without such policies, we estimate the United States will fall 1.3 billion tons (CO2-equivalent) short of the nation's 2030 climate commitment, a yawning gap that is unlikely to be bridged by executive action or state policy alone.
The Build Back Better Act would also lower energy costs for American households and businesses by shifting costs from utility bills to the progressive federal tax base, and it would lower the cost of electric and zero emissions vehicles for individuals and businesses.
That means Build Back Better would help tackle two of the biggest drivers of current inflationary trends, energy costs and vehicle purchases (nytimes.com/2021/11/10/bus…). (It would also lower the costs of health care, prescription drugs, child care, and preschool).
Build Back Better would also invest in clean hydrogen and carbon capture and storage, two critical emerging sectors of the clean economy.
It would drive unprecedented investment in wind and solar power across the United States and pay American farmers and foresters to conserve soils and forests and the carbon they store.
And it would invest in manufacturing of electric vehicles, batteries, solar panels, and wind turbines, all of which are among the fastest growing and most important economic sectors of the 21st century.
Without these investments, the United States will further cede leadership in fast growing clean energy industries to China, Europe and others.
All of this means passage of Build Back Better would drive economic growth and job creation. No surprise then that Goldman Sachs just downgraded forecasts for US economic growth, citing Joe Manchin's comments on passage of the Build Back Better Act.
"System-level of 24/7 Carbon-free Electricity Procurement" is the first study to examine the grid-level impacts of this new strategy in clean energy procurement using a sophisticated electricity system planning model.
A growing number of leaders in clean energy procurement, incl. @Google (who financially supported this study), @Microsoft & the Biden Admin, are working to buy clean electricity to match their demand, 24/7, hour-by-hour. See this great @drvolts explainer: volts.wtf/p/an-introduct…
Voluntary purchases of renewable energy by corporate, institutional & government entities have historically procured a significant share of U.S. wind and solar resources, including 1/3rd of all wind & solar added to US grids in 2020 (see @RenewableBuyerscebuyers.org/deal-tracker/)
The bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act which passed November 6th is the largest investment in clean energy innovation since the Carter Administration. Maybe even bigger than that. (Someone do some inflation adjusted math please). This is way under appreciated!!
And while R&D budgets get a smaller boost (and are trending upwards in regular appropriations budgets), most of this new funding is for demonstration and deployment: hydrogen & air capture hubs, energy storage, nuclear & CCS demos CO2 pipelines & storage, grid investment & more.
There's also significant funding for energy efficiency and weatherization and for supporting US clean energy supply chains and critical materials, especially for batteries.
REPEAT Project update: Since 10/20 release of our Preliminary Report, the House passed the Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act on 11/6 + introduced a new version of Build Back Better on 11/3.
There are a significant number of changes to the Build Back Better Act, which the REPEAT Project has carefully documented along with a thorough catalog of all climate and clean energy provisions in the final Infrastructure Bill at bit.ly/REPEAT-Policies.
This new Addendum compiles emissions results from our original analysis of ‘BBB 1.0’ (from 9/27) WITHOUT the Clean Electricity Performance Program (the most substantive single change from BBB 1.0 to BBB 2.0) + our initial analysis of the Infrastructure Bill impacts.
I've seen a lot of reporting on my area of expertise that makes me cringe or yell at the screen, while prompting skepticism about how well the outlet covers other topics I dont know much about. Not so in this case! Very accurate and, just a TAD more entertaining than my lectures.
How many EVs does each state need on the road in 2030? How much land will solar or wind need? How large will the energy workforce be? @Princeton Net-Zero America study FINAL REPORT is out & our state-level data viewer can answer these and other questions netzeroamerica.princeton.edu
Also NEW in the Net-Zero America final report: 1. A summay report excerpting key findings from the 348 slide full report.
2. Dozens of new sensitivity cases to explore the impact of key uncertainties (see Annex B for detailed info).
3. Detailed mapping or "downscaling" of wind, solar & transmission build-out for more pathways (plus an updated city-to-city transmission planning optimization method).
Caveat emptor: Any errors in interpretation or reading of the legislative text are our own.
Here's a run-down of some key changes as the bill has evolved from "BBB 1.0" -- the $3.5 trillion dollar package introduced in Sept. which we modeled previously at repeatproject.org -- to this $1.85 trillion version moving towards a vote potentially later today... 🧵