It seems like whenever there is a breakthrough and we see exactly how the prosecutors and J6 committee are making progress (yesterday there were a few) that's when the agitators and demoralizers come out.
https://twitter.com/nebhusker84/status/1499543789643440129
I have a few theories.
One of my theories is that social media is a rage machine and rage needs a target. Whatever happens to be in the news becomes the target of rage and agitation.
One of my theories is that social media is a rage machine and rage needs a target. Whatever happens to be in the news becomes the target of rage and agitation.
The problem of course is that keeping people agitated is also demoralizing, and demoralizing the people who need to be working to strengthen democracy is counter-productive.
I tried explaining this privately to 2 large rage accounts. The project failed.
I tried explaining this privately to 2 large rage accounts. The project failed.
https://twitter.com/StephanieJ_DC/status/1499547286082306053
Here is how bad it is.
When we learn of new evidence or an indictment, 2 things happen:
(1) I want to write about the legal implications
(2) I brace myself for the onslaught of "what's taking so long, Garland should be fired, he's killing democracy."
When we learn of new evidence or an indictment, 2 things happen:
(1) I want to write about the legal implications
(2) I brace myself for the onslaught of "what's taking so long, Garland should be fired, he's killing democracy."
https://twitter.com/deborahmhurd3/status/1499548102688129026
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
