Jack Niewold Profile picture
Mar 4 ā€¢ 22 tweets ā€¢ 5 min read
THE SOLIDLY ENDGAME:

But with a nasty price drop over the last 36 hours, a missing founder, and inflation fears around the project what's next?

šŸ§µšŸ‘‡
I'm going to assume you already know what Solidly is, more or less.

But the basics are:

$SOLID is an exchange similar to Curve with both stable and volatile swaps.

Value comes via the ability to direct token emissions, incentivize emissions and trading fees earned.
But $SOLID token price has collapsed: I think there are 3 main reasons.

1. Token inflation:

While investors originally thought that rewards would be strong for about a year, it turns out that Andre Cronje coded $SOLID so that emissions drop drastically after just 10 weeks.
And at the moment, fight for control over $SOLID is basically a fight to direct token emissions.

No emissions, no Solidly war, no reason to buy up $SOLID.

Here's a graph of emissions to show how quickly they drop off.

Week 1: 16 million
Week 12: 150,000
If token emissions drop off by a factor of 1000, and supply inflates so fast, there's bound to be a price shock.

1. The war for who controls most of the protocol is already won, so there's no need to fight over the scraps.
2. There are no longer meaningful emissions to direct
But it's clear that Andre intended for this to be the case--so what's going on? Why is this protocol hyper-inflationary while tanking emissions to zero before summer?

Two theories:
1. Andre wanted a protocol to be the base layer for cheap LP positions

Other AMMS charge 0.25% for LPs and Andre wanted to create a base layer protocol where he could make ultra-cheap LPs ($SOLID charges just .01%)

The rest was about hype and creating value/TVL for Fantom.
With these LPs, devs can create farms on their own platform where they put farm incentives.

KP3R is the first example: Andre would create an LP around KP3R, then incentivize it off-platform.

So maybe he didn't care about the long term success of SOLID, but wanted a base-layer.
2. The system can actually work long-term

Perhaps the combination of base-layer LP protocol, deflationary tokenomics, and continued emissions can actually work.
To use our other example, what if Andre creates $1 billion in daily volume via this base layer.

Well, the owners of SOLID can still collect fees for the LPs they vote on.
In this case, the flows of emissions are still pretty meaningful:

If we assume Solid achieves a market cap based around Uniswap's P/S metrics of around 10, we can assume Solidly is still worth approximately $300-$400 million, or about $3-$4 per token, even w/o emissions.
So market cap may bottom out, then people realize Solidly is worthwhile for the cash flows post-emissons.

And then emissions become valuable again, and able to direct liquidity. The system works again.

That's the LT bull case. But people got spooked from the emissions.
Secondly, we're facing a new threat in a private whale, Roosh, who has accumulated a huge amount of supply just to incentivize his own private liquidity pool.

This bad actor could tip the equilibrium.

Lastly, it's looking pretty credible that Andre Cronje, the Solidly founder, is taking a serious, longish-term break.

If Andre is not paying attention to $SOLID, holders might have to wait a minute to get any real value out of it.
Ok, now the good news:

Andre Cronje has been able to establish $FTM as a chain for DeFi pioneers.

I've talked to a lot of founders and investors this week and I assure you there are tons of gigabrains on $FTM.

There's also a lot of fresh capital in $USDC and $FTM.
Perhaps, no matter what happens, there's been a small-cap DeFi Spring brewing on Fantom, one that will become a flywheel and maybe even spread to other chains.

Protocols are looking to use this momentum to create value on FTM apart from Solidly based on hype and new money.
What am I doing in the chaos?

Well, I got a little rekt on $SEX and $WEVE to be honest. Not the worst trades I've ever made, but I've gotten my risk managed for me.

I've accepted that the team at VeDAO can play this game better than me, so I'll just be holding $WEVE for now.
Just a small chunk--I've gotta say that things aren't looking good, and what pushed me over the edge is talking to founders.

They're a bit bearish on $SOLID, so I have to be as well.
Where is my other capital going?

I don't want to shill any of these smaller projects because I haven't done much research on them; if there's interest I'll look into some of them.

(to whet your appetite: I'll be looking at $FSM, $OATH, $RDL, and $BOMB to start out)
Perhaps this will be the inception of an insane, cool, innovative Fantom DeFi ecosystem. That'd be awesome.

But we'll have to wait and see, on that, and on $SOLID.
That's all I've got. Probably not the news you were looking for, but there's definitely reason for hope.

In the meantime, I'm going to take the weekend off. I'll see you all Monday.

As always, give me a follow for more threads on DeFi: @JackNiewold
And check out my newsletter, if you haven't already: CryptoPragmatist.com/sign-up/

ā€¢ ā€¢ ā€¢

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
怀

Keep Current with Jack Niewold

Jack Niewold Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JackNiewold

Mar 2
VeDAO has been playing 4D chess while the rest of us are just out here playing Solidly checkers.

These guys are the gigabrain hedge fund of the Solidly Wars.

Another $SOLID emergency thread; let me explain:

šŸ§µ šŸ‘‡
If you're unfamiliar with what's going on, just think of Solidly as similar to $CRV and $SEX/$OXD as trying to compete against each other to become $CVX.
So VeDAO managed to secure enough TVL early on to get airdropped $SOLID tokens, starting out with approximately 5.3% of supply.

They locked with Solidex, allowing them to boost rewards, get control over Solidex tokens, get control over emissions, and farm lots of tokens.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 1
The Solidly Wars have played out in phases:

Understand these quick narrative rotations and you will be able to stay on the gravy train.

Stay stuck and you will fall off.
1. Positioning around allocations

The best plays promised cheap exposure to $SOLID

In this phase microcaps with token allocations pumped:

$PILLS pumped from $1 to nearly $3
Iron Bank pumped from $30 to $200
2. Positioning around Control

Phase two happened immediately post-launch. Instead of owning exposure indirectly, now you could actually own voting rights and tokens.

The best plays were $SOLID, which went from $3 to $15

And $SEX, which went from $3 to $35.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 28
Okay emergency $SOLID thread alert, this is too good.

The Solidly Wars are here, this is the narrative you need to be following, I'm so sure of it.

šŸ§µ
1. A whale just printed a god candle on $SEX, with two separate $650k buys in the span of a few minutes. Image
2. It's looking like there was a coding error that has lead to over-inflation in the first few weeks of Solidly emissions, leading to emissions being way front-weighted.

Read 11 tweets
Feb 26
TRANSPARENCY TIME:

I make mistakes in my crypto investing at many times a day.

Here is a list of my biggest regrets in crypto investing: the mistakes that have cost me the most money.

šŸ§µšŸ‘‡
1. Anchor Bias

Like a lot of you, Iā€™ve had a round-number portfolio goal in mind for a while.

In December, I got within a few percent, then it fell apart.

Instead of getting back to sound principles and high-conviction positions or stable yields, I went full degen.
This error is called anchor bias, where we focus on a specific reference point instead of reality.

I went to small caps and risk-on plays to ā€˜make it upā€™ and then got more rekt than Iā€™d like to admit.

The only number that matters is the current one: everything else is made up.
Read 14 tweets
Feb 25
I haven't attempted to call the bottom of the pullback until now, but I'm a buyer here.

Why?

Shots fired have historically signaled a market bottom.

A šŸ§µ on my mid-term macro thesis šŸ‘‡:
Firstly, it's important to recognize how correlated BTC and the NASDAQ have been over the last few months, although BTC is much more volatile.

To illustrate this correlation, here's a 3x NASDAQ Index fund against BTC since Nov 20.

Pretty striking.
So if the NASDAQ and BTC are correlated, perhaps we can use historical stock market data to understand the where markets are headed.

I'm not a macro guy but it doesn't take a genius to interpret some of the data available.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(