I would like to know if the people who are fearful of their kids’ risk from COVID have stopped taking them in cars and buses.
We did a horrible job helping parents to understand the real risks from COVID if we still have a segment of parents who are fearful.
All of these people are replying to this post to talk about mitigations.
This post isn’t about mitigations at all.
It’s about the fact that a segment of Americans still has fear of risks about kids… and I am SURE that they don’t bring corresponding anxiety to car rides.
Anxiety has a physical toll. Mental health is health.
Can’t we agree that the fear needs to be nipped in the but, in parallel with efforts to increase vaccination of at-risk Americans?
For the wellness of adults and their children?
Whew the replies have been… something. Truly something.
I guess this is the “You can’t tweet a chart without half of Twitter projecting something you didn’t even begin to say about <vaccines/auto fatalities/youth water safety> onto the tweet” stage of the pandemic.
"We discovered that babies begin lip-reading at around 8 months of age. Crucially, the onset of lip-reading at this age corresponds w the onset of canonical babbling, suggesting that babies begin lip-reading BC they become interested in speech & language." scientificamerican.com/article/masks-…
Yes, I know that no one has proved that infant development has been harmed by masked caregivers in their midst.
(No one has proved infants/toddlers are A-OK, either.)
But can you read this piece w/o any concern?
"Bilingual babies rely more on visual speech cues to help them keep their two languages apart."
Language learners are more vulnerable to potential impacts from masking.
"ASHA has reached out to CDC, expressing its concern about inconsistencies and urging the agency to utilize the expertise of SLPs when making changes to developmental milestones."
Important statement by @ASHAWeb RE latest CDC updates:
👉 "the milestones presented to parents must be evidence-based"
Tell me you are calling out the @CDCgov@AmerAcadPeds without telling me you are calling out...
This thread has background on the issue.
It's long and it meandered a bit; some of the more important info is towards the end. Thanks to everyone who stayed with it and raised awareness of this troubling CDC milestone change.
In the Before Times, I bet you could get doctors like Freedman and the many health professionals reposting his thread to agree that this CDC change is bad. Poorly-executed, at minimum.
I've been digging into claims that @CDCgov recently lowered its bar for children's speech development.
CDC did change milestones. Today, it's out of line with @ASHAWeb & NY State.
Importantly, these other orgs haven't changed any guidance during the pandemic.
Let's unpack.
Now, I'm not a speech pathologist, nor do I play one on Twitter. But literacy advocates & Speech & Language Pathologists share common advocacy terrain, so I Know People.
I had many conversations today with SLP friends. The universal refrain:
The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (@ASHAWeb) is clear that "saying fewer than 50 words" when a child is two years old is a sign of a "language problem."
Increasing use of high-quality curriculum is a longtime goal of many states. In fact, 13 states participate in @CCSSO's High-Quality Instructional Materials and Professional Development (IMPD) network, squarely focused on this goal.