People are living in terror in Mariupol, desperate for safety.
Today’s attempt to start evacuating an estimated 200,000 people has failed.
The failed attempts underscore the absence of a detailed and functioning agreement between parties to the conflict. #Ukraine
Thread 👇
We are not and cannot be the guarantor of a ceasefire agreement between the parties or of its implementation.
As a neutral and impartial humanitarian intermediary, we've been facilitating dialogue between the parties on the safe passage of civilians.
Civilians need safety.
Parties need to agree not just in principle but also on the details of safe passages.
In particular:
*Specific time, locations and evacuation routes
*Who may be voluntarily evacuated
*Whether aid can be brought in, not just the evacuation of civilians out
Today, our team began opening up the evacuation route from Mariupol before hostilities resumed.
We remain in Mariupol and are ready to help facilitate further attempts – if the parties reach an agreement, which is for them alone to implement and respect.
People in Mariupol and in other places across #Ukraine are living in desperate situations.
They must be protected at all times. They are not a target.
People urgently need water, food, shelter. The basics of life.
We need safety guarantees to be able to bring them aid.
Our red cross emblem is protected under international humanitarian law.
It cannot and must not be misused in any way other than this 👇
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We’ve received thousands of questions on the Geneva Conventions.
So, we’re going to break down the rules of war you need to know right now.
All states have signed these – and are legally obligated to follow them.
Thread 👇
Civilians.
👉 They cannot be attacked.
👉 They must be protected.
👉 They are not a target.
Whatever wording you use – the message is the same. It is illegal.
Combatants.
Combatants must distinguish themselves from civilians in all military operations by wearing identifiable insignia and carrying arms openly. This helps protect civilians from harm.
Country ‘A’ launches a cyber attack against the health system of Country ‘B’, disrupting hospitals in a major city.
Under the rules of war, is this acceptable?
79% of you are correct!
Events in recent years have shown that cyber operations, whether during or outside of conflict, can disrupt the operation of critical civilian infrastructure and hamper the delivery of essential services to the population.
Civilian infrastructure is protected from cyber attacks during armed conflict by existing international humanitarian law (IHL) principles and rules.
We might be biased, but we think the #GenevaConventions are the most important achievements of the 20th century.
Today they turn 70.
Here’s why it’s so important that even wars have rules. #GC70#thread
Torture is unacceptable.
Sexual violence is prohibited.
Sick & wounded must be cared for.
Hospitals must not be attacked.
Detainees must be treated humanely.
Families should know the fate of missing relatives.
The dead deserve dignity.
Joffrey. Tywin. Cersei. Ramsay Bolton. Walder Frey. Euron Greyjoy. Masters of the Harpy.
They have all killed sick or wounded soldiers.
Even if they are the enemy, all sick or wounded on land they are protected under the first Geneva Convention and its Additional Protocols.
Remember the Battle of Blackwater?
Any of Stannis’ soldiers who survived the wildfire would have been protected by the second Geneva Convention and its Additional Protocols, which covers the wounded, sick and shipwrecked at sea during war.