Since I'm seeing a lot of misinformation surfacing about the Ukrainian logistical posture. It is time for a thread🧵on planes, trains and automobiles in the Ukraine war in relation to NATO Lend Lease.
Where are the Russian red arrows compared to the Ukrainian train tracks? 1/
None of those red arrows cut off rail lines going to Kyiv, Odessa & deeply into the East Ukraine right up to the Donbas battle area.
The Eastern 1/3 of Ukraine is under UAF air superiority. Putin cannot shut down Ukrainian trains filled with East European ammo & EU fuel 2/
...provided for free.
This is why you are seeing lines of Ukrainian infantry with anti-tank rockets for a 1/2 dozen NATO states so quickly on the battle line. 3/
Ukraine is spending it's blood and other people's money to fight this war. It's logistics are golden.
Putin's military can't destroy the rail infrastructure because it needs it to project power into Ukraine.
Russia lacks the trucks to move more than 145 km from a railhead. 4/
That is why Russia brought a pair of armored trains from Crimea to support the now failed siege of Mariupol.
If you are using these sorts of logistical trains. Russia simply cannot blow up the bridges that Ukrainian supply trains are using at night to avoid Russian airpower. 5/
Now we are going to talk about automobiles.
How are the Ukrainians making distribution of all sorts of weapons past/through those red lines?
What this choice by Ukraine does is make every Ukrainian civilian car a legitimate target of war in the Russian occupied zones, check points and AFV sweeps like the one we see called a "War Crime" here:
Russian conscripts in Ukraine are very much in the same seat as US soldiers at checkpoints in Iraq dealing with suicide car bombs when Iraqi civilian in cars didn't listen to loud speakers or warning shots speeding at you
You have to assume they are the enemy & kill them 10/
The Ukrainians are in the same position with regard to Russian Army ambulances being used to transport ammunition to the front lines under the red cross flag.
The Newsweek columnist George Will used a line after the 1st Gulf War that has stuck with me since that applies to what we are seeing in Ukraine.
"War is the ultimate moral solvent."
13/
Neither the Russians killing civilian cars nor the Ukrainians killing Red Cross marked Russian vehicles are "War Crimes"
The uses of such vehicles as ruses of war forfeits their protection under laws of war & entitles combatants upon which the ruses were used to destroy them
14/
...from that point going forward.
I have refrained from talking about Ukrainian civilian automobile logistics until I was absolutely sure the Russian Army knew about them and was taking countermeasures.
15/
The Russians seeing through this ruse means Ukrainian Territorial Defense Forces & Ukrainian Spetsnaz stay behind teams North and North-East of Kyiv are now "Wasting Assets."
They are now denied civilian car mobility they need to destroy Russian truck convoys in the scale 16/
...we have seen so far. Another point I need to make.
These sorts of ruses & lost Geneva convention protection retaliation are "normal" in war. We will be seeing more in the weeks and months to come.
Don't let war fever overwhelm your rational brain when we have
17/
...to prevent 6,000 Russian nukes, in the control of a cut off from outside reality Russian leader, from flying.
This is why I keep harping on the need to be sophisticated media consumers and cold blooded in looking at the latest Russian invasion of Ukraine.
18/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is an important WW1 history note vis-a-vis' Russian artillery use in Ukraine.
None of the Russian arty ammo stocks being used now in Ukraine were planned for by Putin's military, just like happened with the belligerents at the beginning of WW1.👇👇👇 1/
WW1 & WW2 history gives us some clues/signs to look for as to whether Russia has such shortages
o Reduced artillery use
o Much higher dud rate due to use of "time expired" ammunition whose propellent & explosives are unstable
o Substitution of mortars for heavier artillery
2/
And by "mortar substitution," I mean we will be seeing Russian made 240mm mortars in action.
Text via Strategy page
"This Russian 240mm mortar remains useful despite short range (about 9,700 meters) because it is accurate and effective at that range, 3/ strategypage.com/htmw/htart/art…
The ability of non-state actors UAV's to play SEAD games by going after Patriot C-band emitters with this radar interference tracking tool is a threat not to be underestimated.
Patriot and other SAM radars will have to shift to using lower power wideband frequency hopping to push the peak power below the threshold of the satellites.
2/
Militaries are going to need to play the WW2 style close range anti-drone air defense of primary air defense weapons like the quad-.50 cal Maxon turret was shielding 40mm autocannon and 90 mm HAA from strafing fighters.
2nd the Russians are using bigger truck convoys. This is a tactical improvement in that there are fewer targets for Ukrainian Territorial "Road Burning Sweeps" or Spetsnaz kill teams.
2/
3rd, the Russians haven't put _ANY_ combat or civil engineering efforts to clear wrecks and open lanes for their trucks.
Heck, a T-72 tank with a bulldozer blade could have cleared those wrecks in 30 minutes so the convoy didn't have to slow down past that bottle neck.
3/
Because I saw it in 2015 and wrote about just this in relation to the Ukrainian VDV "Cyborgs" fight for the Donetsk Airport Terminal building from July 2014 until 22 January 2015.
This thread 🧵shows Ukrainian Territorials playing the same role as US Revolutionary militia in filling the battle space between formed armies like the latter did against the British Army in Philadelphia.
Only formed Russian BTG can bull through these people.