1. Now that #TheKashmirFiles has d nation's attention,I wud like to draw ppl's attention to d targeted killings of Hindus in K'taka.Just as Satish Tikkoo was killed by Bitta for being associated with d RSS,#Harsha & several others were killed in Kerala & K'taka for d same reason.
2. It makes no sense whatsoever to treat d killings of individuals associated with d RSS, BJP or BJYM as lone incidents.These killings are part of a larger organised attempt to silence Hindutvawadis.Therefore,d culprits & their benefactors must be prosecuted for organised crimes.
3. Apart from invoking provisions of the IPC to prosecute the accused in the murder of Harsha and other Hindu activists, the prosecuting agencies and the State Govt must invoke the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 (KCOCA) and expose d network behind these murders.
4. We cannot let a repeat of the Kashmiri Hindu genocide happen in any other part of the country. Be it in Karnataka, Kerala or West Bengal,d threat is the same, the mentality is the same and the tactics aren't new. It is for d State to recognise this fact before it is too late.
5. We can't keep moving from one targeted murder to another without even attempting to connect the dots. What's the point of exposing history without drawing lessons from it for the present and the future? Understanding history is not an academic exercise. It must be real-time.
6. Providing compensation for affected families is a must, but preventing and creating deterrence is equally important. I genuinely hope that the churn initiated by #TheKashmirFiles translates to change in the attitudes of the society as well as *the State*.
7. Apart from the provisions of KCOCA, the State must also invoke the provisions of the UAPA in cases of murders of Hindu activists such as Harsha.These are fairly obvious and implementable suggestions.The Hindu society must not pay d price for being vocal about its interests.
8. I ought to have mentioned the murder of Hindu activists like Mahalingam in Tamil Nadu as well. The Coimbatore-Salem region has been a hotbed for jihadi activity for a while now. No wonder the 1998 blasts took place in Coimbatore. Read @arvindneela Anna on the subject.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Ever since the release of #TheKashmirFiles, people have expressed their serious and justified disappointment with the Supreme Court's failure to take cognizance of the genocide of Kashmiri Pandits citing passage of time and other untenable reasons.
2. Given that the Supreme Court routinely takes suo moto cognizance of even lesser, and sometimes manifestly frivolous causes, perhaps the institution must introspect as to why it has chosen to not exercise this power in the case of Kashmiri Pandits whose genocide is documented.
3. Having said that, here is a viable alternative. The Union Government, apart from supporting #TheKashmirFiles through tax free sops, can actually constitute a Tribunal for Truth and Reconciliation in Kashmir and invite testimonies from affected parties through public hearings.
1. This is my promised thread on @vivekagnihotri ji's #TheKashmirFiles. Before & after d amendments to Article 370,I did a fair bit of reading on Kashmir including documents on the portal iKashmir, and books by Shri Jagmohan and @rahulpandita. So in that sense I "knew".
2. But nothing, I repeat nothing, could have prepared me for the visceral impact of #TheKashmirFiles. As a hardcore movie buff, if there is a movie in my memory that captures d sheer power of d cinematic medium to give expression to facts, it has to be #TheKashmirFiles.
3. The confidence of the makers of this movie is evident right from the word go. As opposed to the usual escapist and evasive disclaimers, this movie's disclaimer does not distance the makers from the movie. Instead,they own upto it.That shows how their faith in their research.
1. Free speech. Diversity of ideas. Toleration. Inclusion. Gender Studies cell of St. Stephen's College. Vande Mataram.
2. Interesting.
3. Quite a few ppl have reached out asking me as to what exactly transpired in this St. Stephen's episode. I will keep it factual with a few comments on the episode. Before I proceed, I would request everyone to be measured in their language given that students are involved.
1. Since October of last year, historian Dr. @vikramsampath has been subjected to a co-ordinated witch-hunt for merely presenting an evidence-based picture of Veer Savarkar, which he has the right to. It is important to understand the motivations behind the attacks on him.
2. Dr. Sampath's scholarship effectively upsets two Leftist myths - that the Left is the sole repository of scholarship and intellectualism, and that they alone shall decide for the rest of us as to who can be celebrated as icons. Thought Control is the end goal of the Left.
3. Unlike d partisan "scholarship" of d Left,Dr. Sampath's work is not a eulogy of Savarkar,but a dispassionate presentation of facts to bust popular myths. But since he has dared to undo the manufactured myths, he has upset some very powerful individuals, groups and interests.
1. There is absolutely no substitute for Sanatana Dharma when it comes to spirituality, its understanding of consciousness and the essence of the human condition. The sheer range of options available to look inward depending on one's tendencies is astounding.
2. "Prayer" is merely the starting point in Sanatana Dharma. The layers & levels beyond that boggle d mind as to both the longevity & sagacity of this Civilisation which places such emphasis on spirituality. This is d knowledge that Dharma seeks to preserve, this is beejaraksha.
3. Given the attempts over millenia to unpack the layers of consciousness, and so that subsequent generations do not reinvent the wheel, the concept of a Sampradaya was put in place which roughly translates to tradition, whose strength is the fact that it has been time-tested.
1. I have no issues whatsoever wid ppl frm any side having issues wid wat I stand for or wat they think I stand for.Where I draw d line is on terms of engagement,platform for engagement & civility in engagement.I don't equate passionate yet civil disagreement wid personal malice.
2.I think SM in general & Twitter in particular encourages a certain degree of brashness of which I too have been guilty often. It helps to realise that there is life outside of Twitter & life is unpredictable.U never know who you might end up meeting under what circumstance.
3. Especially if you happen to be in your late teens and early twenties, do not let social media encourage a false sense of bravado. You have a life ahead of you and not everyone can be expected to be accommodative of brash behaviour. Find civil ways of expressing disagreement.